Compare and Contrast Two Theories of Leadership. Do These Theories Offer Practical Guidance for Managers?

Leadership and management are alike and different in many ways. There are many different debated by scholars regarding the differences of leadership and management (Marquis & Huston, 2009). Part of the confusion stems from the word “leadership”. Marquis and Huston state that, “the word leadership was not known in the English language until the first half of the 19th century” (Marquis & Huston, 2009, p. 32). Theorists and leadership researchers disagree on what the word leadership is (Marquis & Huston, 2009). Therefore, it is wise to state what roles are integral in leadership (Marquis & Huston, 2009). Marquis lists leadership roles as decision maker, communicator, evaluator, facilitator, risk taker, mentor, energizer, coach, counselor, teacher, critical thinker, buffer, advocate, visionary, forecaster, influencer, creative problem solver, change agent, diplomat and role model (Marquis & Huston, 2009). “Leaders are in the front, moving forward, taking risks, and challenging the status quo” (Marquis & Huston, 2009, p. 33). According to Marquis & Huston (2009), the functions of management include planning, organizing, staffing, directing and controlling” (GCU, 2009). Grand Canyons lecture notes go on to state that, “within each of these functions,

There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.

In the article, Kotter discusses that management and leadership are different concepts. However, these concepts are complementary and needed in order for a particular organization to be successful. For instance, management tends to bring about order and consistency to a particular organization. Meanwhile, leadership enables a particular organization to be able to handle change in this volatile and unpredictable business environment.

ven John Wooden definition of success is refreshing and unique: Wooden states that success is a peace of mind which is a direct result of self- satisfaction knowing you made the effort to become the best of which you are capable. This paper will seek to describe Wooden’s Pyramid of Success and how it fits the business environment in my work place. Also, this paper will identify similarities and differences within the Pyramid of Success by comparing it to leadership styles of the X Theory and the Y Theory. Throughout the Pyramid of Success John Wooden identifies different rationales for each aspect, we will provide our understanding of all his aspects. Lastly, we will attempt to create a new pyramid of success and develop a step by step strategy that allows members to use it and adapt to it.

Leadership is just one of the many assets a successful manager must possess. Care must be taken in distinguishing between the two concepts. The main aim of a manager is to maximize the output of the organization through administrative implementation.

In this report I will discuss the four leadership theories that include leader-member exchange theory, path-goal theory, transactional-transformational theory and the full- range leadership theory.

Different theories of leadership classify leadership in different ways. Based on the use of authority, leadership is classified into three types as autocratic, democratic and laissez faire leadership styles (Adeyemi, 2013). Having gone through my free flow journey has helped me explore my entire life as a process of learning and evolution of my own leadership. This mandatory part of my journal has given me the opportunity to reflect on my personal values as they are the primary influencer to my leadership development. Since our behaviours determines our values, this mandatory journaling is a powerful tool to identify which of the four waves of values (1st and 2nd Wave Values, 3rd and 4th Wave Values) influences my leadership practices.

There are many theories concerning leadership, and how these theories classify various individuals and their particular style of leadership. Leaders throughout the ages have led in different ways, shown unique attributes, and accomplished their tasks or missions in a way that many have found to be one of a kind (Northouse, 2016). Leadership theories such as transactional and transformational leadership have been used to classify many of our leaders of the past (Leadership Theories - In Chronological Order. (n.d.). Other leadership theories exist and offer the same explanation of the types of leaders who shape and have shaped our world. Here we will explore four of them which are; The Great Man Theory, LMX, or Leader Member Exchange Theory, as well as Trait and Contingency Theory.

Throughout history there have been many different philosophies and theories on effective leadership and management. Over time, these theories and ideas have been proven either successfully or unsuccessfully. The key component that stands out is the actual person who is in the leadership or management position. This individual needs to produce many characteristics to ensure smooth and effective management. The character of this one entity is what sets the tone for success or failure in the leadership/management position.

In this report I will discuss the four leadership theories that include leader-member exchange theory, path-goal theory, transactional-transformational theory and the

A leaders traits display certain personality traits, these traits are developed from the theories of leadership, and it is used to determine what personality an individual have. There are many approaches to leadership theories, starting with attributes and traits, also physical and personality’s traits characteristics, competencies and values. A Leader Traits mainly focuses on behavior effectiveness, Traits theory concentrates the personality of a person, it help to understand the differences and what independent traits the person possess. It establishes what traits the person has; such as if, the person is clever, generous. It is a belief that leaders display certain key personality traits, and it is determined that no particular trait is consistently identified with good leadership. Leader’s traits are very important and necessary to provide a description of an individual’s personality, because it offers insight into a person psyche.

-The theory does not consider or take into consideration the ways values affect the group dynamics.

According to Hanly (2016) many theories of management and styles of leadership exist. In the end, none of them are right and none of them are wrong. Different people respond better to different styles of leadership, however Hanly (2016) explains that to be a truly skilled leader a manager needs to be aware of the needs of their staff and adapt their leadership style to nurture the most productivity in employees. Riley (2016) describes three leadership styles and these are autocratic, paternalistic and democratic. However, Hanly (2016) expresses psychologist Kurt Lewin 1930’3 frame-work and it provided the styles autocratic and democratic but includes laissez-faire as the third leadership style.

I have been asked to discuss how management theories is used to help managers achieve good organisational leadership and teach them what attributes they should possess to obtain this. Furthermore, will be discussing what may be considered bad or good practice of organisational leadership. This will be done by analysing different management theories defined as “A collection of ideas which set forth general rules on how to manage a business or organization.” (BusinessDictionary.com, n.d.)Management theories speaks about how managers can relate to their companies through their personalities and with the knowledge of the organisations goals and what it wishes to achieve , the execution of effective means accomplish these goals and

Trait-based theory in some ways similar to the great man theory. The trait theory presumes that people acquire certain qualities or traits make them better suited to leadership trait theories usually recognize certain personality or behavioral characteristics that ae shared by leaders. Conflicts in the relationship among leadership traits and leadership success ultimately led scholars to shift patterns in search of new information for successful leadership (Scientific & Academic