Compare and Contrast of the Three Faces of Power

Modern day power originates from the mind in that we give certain figures power based upon man-made forms of value or worth like money. The definition of power has fluctuated throughout time, and while the past may have emphasized the more violent aspects, today, we have shifted towards a more control based interpretation. Both Michael Foucault and John Berger delve into the idea of power and its functionality. Based on their texts, in our current socio-cultural setting, power is best exploited when the concept behind the power is deindividualized for many purposes, internalized by the people, and integrated throughout society to the point that its origins is mystified.

the last few decades. In the political spectrum power can be seen as authority held by a variety of

‘Political power often involves a struggle for control.’ To what extent does your study of people and politics support this statement?

To extend on the idea of power, Luke points out three ways of perceiving power, which are other representations of the attributes of power that A sets power over B when A impacts B in a style that is different from B’s. The concept of Steven Luke’s decision-making power, particularizes with the politics of the

When comparing politics and power, it seems like we are talking about the same thing. The similarity between politics and power is that both can be noticed when people see it. Regarding Power, however, is the ability someone has to obtain the results they want by exercising their influence over other people. In the case of Jim McGee, he prided himself on his ability to motivate and his ability to resolve complex problems. Nevertheless, Jim’s power style is considered to be an expert power because of the knowledge he has about quality control. When it comes to politics, is all about getting the best result, which sometimes required face obstacles and differences of opinion internally. George Phalen, on the other hand, has a coercive power which

An example of the political power to

According to Brady, Schoeneman and Sawyer (2014), it is useful to consider how power is utilised in any given situation. Community work would be critical of: ‘power over’ vs ‘power with’ (Taylor, 2003). According to Taylor (2003), ‘power over’ occurs when an individual, group or institution assumes the right to make decisions for others or assume they know ‘what is best’ for groups and communities without consultation or collaboration (p.12). An example of this is white Australia assuming that removing Aboriginal children from their families is in the ‘best interests of the child’ (Barta, 2008). Whereas ‘power with’ involves: mutual respect, collaborative partnerships, social justice at all levels, and a commitment to self-determination

To ensure the orderliness and functioning of a society, there is often a power system or government structure in place. Now, there are many different systems of power, each based upon a different ideology or set of values. There can be corrupt governmental power systems that control almost every aspect of a society, totalitarianism for example, and there can also be purely democratic societies where the fate of the country rests in the majority of its members, and there can be anything in between. Michel Foucault, author of “Panopticism,” talks about what he calls “power relations” (187). A power relation is the connection between who or what has the power and how that power is projected. Foucault analyzed the design of Jeremy Bentham’s “panopticon”

The need to define where power lies is a key point in the argument for

Luke’s book Power: a Radical view is one of the most influential books wrote and is well known as a classic. The debates in his book have taught many lessons to both students and scholars around the world. The main argument of Lukes’ book is his description of three dimensional power and how this power forms people’s preferences and interests. Power influences what people do, say and think. Three dimensional power is all about manipulation. People who have power in situations can convince others that they are right. They have got the power to influence behaviour and manipulate people’s interests. The easiest example is a Marxist example as it gets the message of its idea out even if people do not agree with the Marxist perspective. The understanding of the people in the working class is that their own interests

The text “Contemporary Society” by James Arvanitakis denotes conceptions of power as ‘capacity’. This refers to the power that individuals, groups or institutions may possess. Hence, the perception of power as ‘stuff’. This shows that power as ‘capacity’ is something measurable and regarded as a quantitative capacity . For instance, power as ‘stuff’ can be perceived through wealth, and in terms of authoritative positions. An example of this is the automatic assumption that if an individual has more money than another, that individual is more powerful and influential in contemporary society. This ideology is also evident in the

It is a common knowledge that politics is concerned with power: the power to make decisions, to control

Power is present in every relationship and within each individual. Power is defined as a group’s ability to make another group its subject or to make some desired action either by consensus or force. Within any organization or government, some elite groups make decisions that directly or indirectly affect the lives of the larger mass. Studies have shown that such decisions in most cases are made to service the elite’s value and economic interests; property ownership or production. Such directions within the society cause resentment and inequality when the larger mass is not included in the decision making. The inequality makes the elite class to enforce their wishes and will on the less fortunate (Jessop 174). This essay seeks to give a

In order to accurately understand the concept of political power, and develop it from its source, we must first understand the nature of man. Naturally all men are in a state of perfect liberty. This signifies that they can dispose of their persons and possessions and can order their actions in the way they see as fit, within the limits of nature’s law, without depending on or asking permission from any other man.

There are many theories pertaining to the nature of power in society. In modern society, it is important to identify where and when power is exercised, who benefits and who suffers from it being exerted upon them. In this tradition, it is useful to examine the managerialist perspective.