Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity

1790 WordsJun 23, 20188 Pages
Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity Validity is an important aspect of the research design. For instance, in research the uses statistics as the primary form of measurement. Validity applies to the truth of a standard. A measure is valid, in general, when it (Renata, 2011, 1) includes what it devised to measure. Renata (2011) explained, "Internal and external validity are the two primary types of validity" (para. 1). However, both display diverse aspects of a study’s design and results. In order to distinguish internal and external validity, it is essential to understand what the term validity itself means with respect to research design. Validity applies to the truth or likely truth of a…show more content…
For instance, if researchers ask questions, present tasks, or observe behaviors such as a way of assessing an underlying construct. The researchers should obtain some kind of evidence that their approach does. In fact, measure the construct in question. There are three types of validity primary related to the results of an assessment: internal, external, construct validity. If an evaluation has internal validity, the variables manifest a causal relationship. Completion validity signifies there is some relationship between different variables involved, whether positive or negative. External validity includes causal relationships drawn from the study that generalized to other situations. These are the difference between internal, external, and construct validity. Compare External, Internal, and Construct Validity No matter what research methodology a person chooses, he, or she must think about the validity of your approach. We have already described the importance of validity in measurement instruments. Here, we are talking about the validity the accuracy, meaningfulness, and credibility of the research project at a whole. Your research effort will be worth your time and effort only to the extent that it allows him, or her to draw meaningful and defensible conclusions from your data. Extensive time in the field. – The researcher may spend several months, perhaps even a year or more,

More about Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity

Open Document