Comparing Ancient Roman And Roman Tombs

Han Dynasty and Roman Empire have many cultural aspects including religious, geographical, and political similarities that can be compared, though many differences are also widespread during this era. Though Roman and Han political structures, both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through many amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfall. Their religions differed greatly, with Rome, emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. One might ask, Which civilization yielded the best

When comparing Han China and Classical Rome, many political, geographical, and religious similarities can be found, though many differences are also prevalent. Though Roman and Han political structures both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through copious amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfalls. Their religions differed immensely, with Rome emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay.

Once the river valley civilizations had all formed their governments, it was very clear that there was social inequality in all of these areas. There was a hierarchy in all the civilizations, and people were ranked in social order based on their status and authority. The governments were also run in a patriarchal manner, in which the authority and power was passed down from the king to his eldest son. This occurred throughout all the civilizations, however, the Huanghe government changed that, and made it so you could earn your job by taking an iq test and not based on your social

Society cannot exist without a unified social doctrine, as is true with both the Han and Roman empires. While there may be vast differences between them, at their roots is the same thing, a structure built on family. In this family

One of the primary aspects of social structure in China was class. In the Classical Era, the Han and Qin dynasties ran China as a bureaucracy based on a person’s importance to society. One of the main reasons status did not pertain to the amount of wealth a person had is that during this time, China was an agrarian based society, which meant that farmers did

3. Evidence – (China) These people were elite members of society. To become involved in politics or to be any leader, a person had to take a test of intelligence, based off Confucian teachings and beliefs. (India) In society, Brahmins (priests) were held in the highest regard. Whatever caste a person was born into, that is where the person stayed, and that’s what determined the person’s importance.

The first source; “Chinese title” ("The Contrast of Enfeoffment System between Eastern Zhou and Early Han") is an insightful thesis written by Xuzhi Shang in 2015. Her analysis reviews all different outcomes created by the governments in two separate dynasties. Shang is an associate professor of Tianjin Polytechnic University, teaching law and political courses. She received her doctor degree in political science and has published many theses on major historical journals, including the aforementioned. Her substantial education proves her credibility on the preceding topic, and that she is a reliable author. Besides her education, Xushi is also highly acclaimed on her achievement in law study, thus, this may have shifted the focus of her research. The purpose of this source is to compare and differentiate the utilization of this unique system in three distinctive methods for both dynasties: background, consequences, and influence. The value of the source originates from the arguments the author made between the Etiquette system and the Enfeoffment

The artwork I chose to talk about is on page 232. Figure 8.16, Funerary Relief of a Circus Official, Ostia, 110-130. The medium of the artwork is made from Marble relief. The Tombs in the old days of roman families built outside of the city walls, along roadways entering the city. The vision of the monuments is to preserve individual’s fame, family honor, and status in the society. The extended family of the deceased also held feasts and putting out food and drink for the dead for enjoying. The large figure in the picture is the official himself, holding hands with his wife at the left side. The handshake symbolizes in the Roman art the indication of marriage. The palm branch symbolizes the victory. There are many accents in the artwork

Before Qin became emperor, the government system was not fair. He improved it by ranking officials according to their achievements and abilities. Instead of having status because of family, soldiers would be promoted

Qin Shi Huangdi, the first Qin emperor, was an ambitious emperor who implemented a central bureaucratic system that oversaw the evolution and unification of China at the cost of public sentiment. The Qin Dynasty is considered to be among the most influential dynasties as it laid the foundation for the massive cultural and economic development of China that took place during the Han Dynasty, but it also failed to achieve many of its pro-commoner ideological goals. In fact, socioeconomic disparity was not alleviated and despite the notion of enriching the lives of the common people, it was under Qin rule in which public resentment of the authoritarian government peaked as there were countless peasant revolts against the iron-handed bureaucratic rule of the Qin. Because a paranoid emperor alone wielded political clout and influence, the tumultuous few years of Qin reign was rife with paranoia and suspicion among the masses. Although the Qin Dynasty is seldom thought to possess the same glaring discrepancy between ideology and state that the Communist regime in post-World War II China had, the failure of the flawless egalitarian state models in socioeconomic and political aspects during the Qin Dynasty mirrored the developments in early Communist China.

Athens had a Meritocracy. A meritocracy is a society governed by the people selected according to merit. Basically governed officials were chosen by the people for the people. Men of Athens had a voice and were able to participate in these elections. No one man was ever allowed to have all of the power (“Document 4”). In contrast to, Han China was the complete opposite when it came to governing. The emperor and his officials were in control. The educated bureaucrats and aristocrats had some say in who was going to rule whereas lower classes had no say.

In conclusion, I have described the afterlife and the death rituals in Ancient China by describing some of their practices as well as what they believed in. I characterized the afterlife and the beliefs of Ancient China by explaining and describing the different concepts and perceptions that tie in with my topic. I also described that in Ancient China they do use the use of terror management theory by knowing that they are going to die because they know that they are promised an afterlife (C. Davis, personal communication, October, 2016). As ethical responsibly goes, it is the chore to follow and continue the correct path, which ties in with the people of Ancient China being promised an afterlife as well (C. Davis, personal communication, September,

One of the things that makes a nation strong is population size, however common practices of Athenian made it impossible for them to grow as strong as they could be. “For ten days after birth the father could inspect the baby, and if he found it deformed or weakened in any way, he could order it to be exposed in some public place to die.” (Doc N). With this being common practice in Athens, their nation was unable to grow as strong as it could be. The Han Dynasty did not kill their newborns, their next generation, and it contributed to them being the more successful nation. The other important factor in society if the women. This half of the population was treated as second class citizens for centuries, including by the Hans and Athenians. However, there were more oppertunities for women in China than Greece. “Athenian women had few rights under law- like slaves and resident aliens, they were in affect, legal minors.” (Doc Q). When half of the population is treated like slaves, and is not repected by the people around them, it brings down the morale of society, making life more difficult, and the nation less fruitile. In the Han Dynasty, upper class women could be educated, and Ben Zhao is an example of a highly literate woman whose work was read all over China, and was greatly admired. (Doc R).

Jacob Stauffer Steven Hill World Civ I 5/29/18 Roman and Han economy The way the economy works and that we live under today differs greatly compared to what Rome and China lived under. We’ve found ourselves using a similar structure of economy when it comes to agriculture, the use of roads, political systems, military, government etc. Early Rome and China both shared these similarities for survival and progression towards a stronger and revitalized economy. However, both empires shared a great number or similarities and differences when it came to social and political matters.

In ancient India and China a social system was developed to separate the society into levels. This social system is called a caste system. Which caste level you belong to was determined by your occupation and family origin. If you were born the son of a king your life was grand. But, if you were born to a farmer you are a farmer for life. Your birth determines where you fall in the caste system, and you live according to the rules. Both ancient India and China had the caste system. Ancient India and China had similarities and differences in the caste system.