preview

Comparing Aquinas, And Paley's Natural Theology

Decent Essays

A watch embodies all appearances of intelligent design. It has purpose, a certain disposition or instruction. It is a complex object; all parts are needed for it to fulfil its purpose and we could not substitute any of these parts. It is made of a specific set of materials; we do not find smelted gold or blown glass naturally occurring in nature. The watch also has a regular motion. All these properties and dispositions a watch personifies show it is a creation and not just a naturally occurring object. The same is said about the human eye through analogy. This is the reason William Paley chose to use the watch as well as the human eye to highlight his argument for design in his work Natural Theology, (1802). The teleological argument he puts forth is one we can know empirically through observation. It is not the purpose of the argument to fully convince us that the argument is correct in every way. The purpose is to offer the audience a logical and suggestible conclusion. However the argument …show more content…

He argues that what we see within nature always acts towards an end. He goes on to explain things in nature “achieve their end, not fortuitously but designedly” Although the end things achieve may not be seen as purpose it can be a cause for acting in a certain way.
This is where the idea of creating objects to fulfill purposes becomes blurred. A reasonable comparison would be to fill up a glass with water and then have the water amazed at the fact the glass has been made to fit it perfectly, when in fact it could be no other way. This is an example of a weak anthropic argument. If such a thing as the universe was different in any of way we would not be around to know about it. We are left to inhabit the only known universe able to exist. Maybe it is the human race which has adapted for the universe, not the other way around, as the human eye has been finely tuned for

Get Access