Essay on Comparing Arnold Schwarzenegger and Adolf Hitler

There were differences between Hitler and Napoleon, however I feel there were more similarities. They were both immigrants in the country they ended up ruling, both conquered most of Europe, both had radical views about fighting, and both were very quick in their fighting. However, the most significant similarities between the two leaders is how they were accepted as monarchs in a previously democratic society, and what they did for the countries after becoming monarchs.

Fascism was a totalitarian political movement that developed after 1919 as a reaction against the political and social changes brought about by World War 1 and the spread of socialism and communism. It flourished between 1919 and 1945 in several countries, mainly Germany, Spain, Italy, and Japan. Fascism is a form of totalitarian dictatorship that had ideals such as extreme nationalism, economic self sufficiency and military strength. The dictators abolished all opposition against them and basically took complete control of the lives of everyone in their country.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler are often referred to as two of the most influential people of the first half of the twentieth century. FDR and Hitler were certainly the two most influential and powerful people in their time of economic depression and world war. These were two very different men, but they had their similarities. Both of these men brought their country’s out of an economic depression. The two were very impressive speakers. Hitler certainly had his “critics”, but so too did Franklin Roosevelt.

It is extremely evident that Jews were the main target for dire judgmental opinions, but there was one man who had a passion for Germany; he believed he was the ‘saviour’ of Germany, this man served in the first world war, and it was then, near the end of the war, recovering from a war wound, when Germany was weak and crumbling, he made a vow to himself, that he would be the one, to make Germany strong, he was: Adolf Hitler.

To fully answer this question one must look at the underlying philosophies behind Hitler’s leadership. What did he stand for and did his ideologies have any redeeming characteristics? Indisputably he had an ability to lead and motivate. He was revered with almost God – like fanaticisms by his people. This essay will set out to establish the basis of his leadership and within that framework, the nature of the man and his vision for the world.

He quickly moved up in the party’s heicharch. Eichmann accomplished this because he made Jewish matters become his matters. He quickly started studying Hebrew and took trips to Palestine. (Brager, 1) Furthermore, this would aid him in the future, as his power grows stronger in the Nazi Party.

This depression occurred when the Wall Street Crash sent America's industries and businesses into a crisis; due to America's large trade industries, this depression spread to a lot of other countries. This made the unemployment rate in Germany sky high but for the Nazi's this benefitted them because they earned more votes which were the push Hitler needed to get into power. This depression helped Hitler prey on people's fear of communism so he promised the people of Germany that he would get rid of unemployment. This promise strengthened their support to vote for the Nazi's and was a major factor for Hitler to gain domination. The Reichstag fire was also a big help to get Hitler in power because the communists were blamed for the fire that occurred which then helped the Nazi's win the 1933 election. Overall, the Treaty of Versailles only made Hitler rise to make Germany better and

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are 2 notoriously known people in world history. Both Stalin and Hitler are known for the great number of deaths they have caused. Although both men have totally different reasons on why they killed so many people their ways of leadership are somewhat alike.

Two of the most significant leaders in modern history were Martin Luther King Jr and Adolf Hitler. Although both figures left their mark on their respective nations’ political, social and economic landscape, one is revered while the other remembered with disdain and horror. This essay will compare and contrast key characteristics that were and are central to King and Hitler’s rise to prominence and memory. Some observations will be based on the speeches in the 1963 March on Washington for the former and 1953 propaganda film ‘Triumph of the Will’ for the latter’s references.

The Great Depression played a big role in helping the Nazi Party capture power. Many nations were suffering from the Great Depression in 1930, including Germany who had to pay for the war reparations. During this period of economic and politic crisis, the country had been easily influenced by the politics parties. They wanted someone who is capable and had what it takes to be their leader to lead them through the huge crisis that they were facing. Most Germans who are in desperate state as they wanted Germany to be like once, able to be proud of and not in such a state where they had to struggle to fulfill the almost impossible terms of the Treaty of Versailles. They considered that period as a disgraceful decade in their history. Due to

In Germany the economy was especially vulnerable since it was built out of foreign capital, mostly loans from America and was very dependent on foreign trade. When those loans suddenly came due and when the world market for German exports dried up, the well-oiled German industrial machine quickly ground to a halt. As production levels fell, German workers were laid off. Along with this, banks failed throughout Germany. Savings accounts, the result of years of hard work, were instantly wiped out. Inflation soon followed making it hard for families to purchase expensive necessities with devalued money. Overnight, the middle class standard of living so many German families enjoyed was ruined by events outside of Germany, beyond their control. The Great Depression began and they were cast into poverty and deep misery and began looking for a solution, any solution. By mid-1930, amid the economic pressures of the Great Depression, the German democratic government was beginning to unravel. The crisis of the Great Depression

<br>The stock market crash of 1929 effected practically every nation in the world. Germany was already suffering a post-war depression and was greatly effected. Hitler used the suffering of the masses to gain political support. He gained a strong following from the

“You represent a great ideal”, says Adolf Hitler to the 52,000 workmen standing below his podium, in Leni Riefenstahl’s 1934 film Triumph of the Will. The men are their to see their leader, to see Hitler speak about Germany in a new era and further more the bringing Germany together as one. The propaganda played out in this film, displays the scenes were biased towards The Nationalist Socialist Party, providing possible mis-leading information and further speeches incased as heroic yet being quite juxtaposed. The film surrounds the leader of the Nazi’s in a positive way and further the population of Germany accepting and respecting him (Hitler) as their leader and Almighty.

The Great Depression, one the worst times for Germany, and countries across the world. Germany was the worst hit country because America had to recall it's big loans it had given Germany as they could no longer afford it, this meant Germany could not afford to reparations to the allies.

Hitler blamed the Weimar republic for starting the great Depression; however this is false, with the true cause of the Depression being the collapse of the Wall Street stock market in America, on 29th October 1929, also known as black Tuesday. Despite being so far away the economic downfall of the USA dramatically impacted the Germany as the entire German economy, businesses and even banks were built upon foreign capital and were therefore reliant on American loans, due to Stresemann’s Dawes plan of 1924 in which America loaned Germany $800 million in order to help