Comparing British Welfare Systems with 2 Other Countries Essay

The United States is often referred to as a ‘reluctant welfare state.’ There are various reasons for this description. One of the primary reasons for this is the differences and diversity of the political parties which are the motivating forces that control government. The Liberal Party, for instance supports government safety nets and social service programs for those in need. “Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all.” ("Studentnews," 2006) They believe it is the responsibility of government to ensure that the needs of all citizens are met, and to intervene to solve problems. The responsibility of government is to alleviate social ills, to protect civil liberties and sustain individual

This essay will examine how the development of the Welfare State and the NHS changed the lives of the people of Britain since its introduction in 1948. To enable me to do so, I will analyse and evaluate the key relevant aspects that happened during that period.

This assignment will be describing the structures of health and social care within the British Welfare state. This includes looking at the roles of different sectors, agencies, professions and the distinction between health and social care. It will then analyse the relationships between both health and social care and its wider historical, ideological and social context. Lastly, it will compare structures and contexts of health and social care within two nations of the United Kingdom.

According to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, a disabled person “has a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. ” Around 11 million people in the UK are living with a limiting long term illness, impairment or disability with less than half employed. With developing technology,

The welfare system has been controversial throughout U.S. history. It is constantly under attack and is often the chosen topic of political debates. In 2015, 35.4% of Americans were on welfare (Boyd). Welfare is a government ran program, where the government gives benefits to people who cannot afford to take care of themselves or their family (“Brief”). The benefits that the government gives to the people are money and the necessities they need to live a normal life (“Welfare” 825). The welfare system is an interesting topic and has many layers. Although it is necessary, at the same time it is frustrating for many politicians and U.S. citizens. Numerous people abuse the welfare system everyday. People have found many ways to take

This essay will examine how the development of the Welfare State and the NHS changed the lives of the people of Britain since its introduction in 1948. To enable me to do so, I will analyse and evaluate the key relevant aspects that happened during that period.

Disability leave is time off from work for a reason related to someone’s disability. It is a type of ‘reasonable adjustment’ which disabled workers are entitled under the Equality Act 2010.

Disability pension financially support Ruby’s basis needs even though she is not in the workforce (Malcus, Carlqvist, Sturesson, & Eberhardt, 2005). This enable her to participate in volunteering work without payment. However, the assets test on disability pension can be a physical barrier to participation as Ruby will be receiving inheritance from her parents. Thus, she may not eligible for a full disability pension and have to save up her money. She said she will leave the centre before 3:30pm to make sure she can travel for free with her Pensioner SmartRider

In conclusion the Welfare State was created on the principle that the state accepted a responsibility to protect and promote the welfare of all citizens. It must be noted that the system was designed to provide a national minimum, not reduce inequalities. I have looked in detail at all aspects to combat the “five giants “and the popular support when the Beveridge report was introduced. I have also looked at flaws in the system, however the cornerstone of the Beveridgian welfare system, was left almost untouched until the 1980’s.

United States Government Welfare began in the 1930’s during the Great Depression. Franklin D. Roosevelt thought of this system as an aid for low-income families whose men were off to war, or injured while at war. The welfare system proved to be beneficial early on by giving families temporary aid, just enough to help them accommodate their family’s needs. Fast forward almost 90 years, and it has become apparent that this one once helpful system, has become flawed. Welfare itself and the ideologies it stands on, contains decent fundamentals; furthermore, this system of aid needs only to be reformed to better meet the needs of today’s society.

Throughout this week’s reading, authors Colin Hay and Daniel Wincott evaluate European welfare capitalism, specifically the different types of welfare capitalisms and the roles each of them play in shaping those under their influence. The authors begin by briefly going over the history of welfare capitalism in Europe, specifically stating that welfare states have transformed most western European states “in the century or so after 1880” (pp.33). After this short overview, Hay and Wincott go on to state the importance of Epsing-Andersen’s The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (1990) in shaping the approach to which we now analyze welfare states. “It, and the literature is has spawned, differentiates between a least three (often more) different

Many scholars and writers have started to analyze the welfare regimes in their writing after the Second World War and later on they focus on the different types of welfare regimes. Among them, one was theorist Esping-Anderson (1990), whose typologies haven been described in his important book “The three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

The term “welfare state” is developed in the 1930s and has been regarded as the opposite meaning of warfare at that time. The concept is interpreted in various ways in different countries due to cultural and socio-economic differences and different historical development (Esping-Andersen, 2013). A welfare state, generally speaking, refers to a state where the society takes responsibility for providing comprehensive welfare like social and economic security to its population (Spiker, 2014). Despites different interpretations of welfare state over time and across countries, the essential values that a welfare state seeks to pursue are expected to remain consistent. This paper aims at identifying values that a welfare state seeks to maximize through literature review. Furthermore, the paper will also review the historical development of welfare system in Hong Kong and find possible similarities between Hong Kong and a welfare state.

The liberal welfare state provides modest social insurance plans, and universal transfers to low income, working-class dependents. “It is a model in which implicitly or explicitly, the progress of social reform has been severely

Along the same lines, a welfare state refers to the notion of a form of administration in which the functions of providing social and economic welfare to the populace fall upon the shoulders of the state. This theory is grounded in the concept of the parity of opportunity, an evenhanded allocation of