Comparing Canada's Expectations Of Nora And Torvalds

Jocelyn Letourneau’s is a history professor that wrote the essay “Reconstructing the Canadian Identity”. The author argues that if one compares the Harper government's idea of conservatism against Trudeau’s idea of multiculturalism, the reader can infer that multiculturalism is failing and Canada should go back to its monarch roots. By bringing back symbols of monarchy, a new Canadian perspective would form. Letourneau’s essay is structured in a very well and composed matter. His arguments and connections are structured in proper format where his whole essay can be linked and understood easily by the average individual. Although Letourneau’s essay is structured in a proper format, it is without its faults. The essay contains many fallacies that give his arguments a weak perspective on the topic. Also throughout his essay, the author appears to be taking a side within his argument. His bias viewpoint makes himself, and his work uncredible to the reader.

I think that the vigilant Laura Secord best represents Canadian identity for the letter v because without her efforts, Canada could have been attacked and conquered by the Americans . In addition, I strongly believe that the vigilant Laura Secord relates to Canadian Identity because she proves that being a Canadian citizen means to have a vigilant eye towards fellow Canadians to keep our beautiful nation safe.

Charlie Angus was elected as a Member of Parliament in 2004, a role which took him to the Forgotten Children of Attawapiskat. It was his experiences prompted him to write his book, Children of the Broken Treaty: Canada’s Lost Promise and one Girl’s Dream, which tells the story of Indigenous persons of Canada’s struggles, including treaty rights, residential schools, as well as the fight for education and safe housing. The book provides a challenge to many common assumptions, and it also explores many themes which are used to explain the events which have shaped Canadian culture and policies. Angus begins his book by touching on some of the original treaties signed between the first Canadian government and the members of the bands that are indigenous to the land. One of these was Treaty 9, which promised education for Indigenous children. The book then developed into the foundation of residential schools, and the horrors that are endured there. In addition to the horrendous amounts of verbal, physical and sexual abuse which took place in these schools, the students who attended these institutions faced the mass genocide of their culture, as the unspoken purpose of these schools was “to kill the Indian in the child” (Angus, 2015, p. 14). The beginning of the book, while very dark, provides an honest introduction to some of the themes that can be spotted throughout the book, and history itself. The three themes that primarily stood out to me as a reader were: cultural

In our society couples, for the most part, know each other and get married because they are in love. On the other hand, people in different countries have arranged marriages by the law or by their families, without even hardly knowing the person. For example, back in the distant past kings and queens were forced to get married in order to be in the reign. Another example is in countries like India some children have to get married by a certain age. This is not always just required by the law, it is sometimes just required by their families. In Fahrenheit 451, the couple’s relationship with each other is distant. They don’t remember how they met and they’re not in love with one another. ‘Clarisse says, “Funny, how funny, not to remember where or when you met your husband’” (Bradbury 40). They’re just there for the company. Our two societies’ sometimes fall in love for the wrong reasons, and don’t seem to be in love with one another. “’What a shame. ‘’ Clarisse says, “’you’re not in love with anyone”’ (Bradbury 18). Although the two different world’s relationships are falling apart, they also have upsides to these relationships. They both care for the other partner out of the goodness of their heart and they want the other person to be

The proliferation of Canadian women’s movements, notably their redefining role in society, has had a profound propitious impact on Canada’s identity in the twentieth century. The contribution of Canadian women in the cultural life (sports, the arts and dance), the political impact from the leadership role of a female perspective (Nellie McClung) and women’s economic empowerment all contribute to the shape of Canadian history. Our current Canadian national identity has been shaped and developed by events from our past by our determination, doing the "impossible", staying dedicated and true. Also by doing what others thought we couldn 't, proving people wrong and being dedicated to our plans and outlines (Vimy Ridge). By gaining more independence, freedom, equality, rights and responsibilities . By being compassionate, sticking to your words and seeking for new rights (Pierre Trudeau). Even though there are so many past events that have shaped and developed our Canadian national identity, negative things have also done the same but in a negative way. We Canadians are proud of our accomplishments and achievements. We have shaped and developed a great Canadian national identity from the past which we are still making. We have made mistakes and we are still trying to mend those today. Overall our Canadian national identity has been shaped and developed by events in our past by achieving our recognition and milestones, the cultural life (sports,

The attitude Torvald has towards his wife, Nora, throughout the play almost makes it seem as though he is constantly judging her for her actions without telling her how he truly feels. As any married couple should know, “lack of communication is a prime cause for divorce” (Perry). He does not express his concerns in a mature manner but instead he talks to her like she does not know any better for the little things she has done. For instance, when she mentions that she is not allowed to have the macaroons because of Torvald, this shows that he has a way of controlling her. It continues by him calling her names such as song bird, squirrel, spendthrift, or skylark. He also has no trust for her. He shows this by mentioning her actions in regards to spending money. “You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me, and, as soon as you have got it, it seems to melt in your hands” (Ibsen “A Doll’s House” 930). With this lack of trust, they simply could not thrive and last nearly as long as they may have once thought. Marriage does not bind people if they cannot find the truth in one

In order to have a successful marriage, Nora and Torvald should have tried to compromise. In today’s world, without compromise there is no marriage. It is almost impossible to find another human being that likes exactly what you like all the time. For example, if my boyfriend and I go to the movies, we alternate who will pick the movie so that we both can see movies we like. If people only did what they liked, how are new things learned? Some say opposites attract but an unknown author once said “opposites attract, but

Nora is treated like a child by Torvald, but she is accustomed to it and believes he loves her dearly. However, an important component of a successful and true marriage is trust, which is lacking in the Helmers’ marriage. Nora keeps a secret from Torvald while he is reluctant to trust her with money, let alone his reputation (Ibsen 2, 3, 13). When Torvald discovers that Nora has kept a secret from him, he is furious and takes away her right to raise the children without a second thought (Ibsen 83). However, while Torvald was throwing a fit, Nora comprehends that he has never loved her and that she was forcing herself to believe she loved him (Ibsen 87). Like Nora, Edna knew that she and her husband, Leonce, never loved each other; she thought he was her ticket out of her old life while he thought of her as his possession (Chopin 8, 29). Both Edna and Nora were raised to be obedient wives, but Edna, after her awakening, felt like marriage was “one of the most lamentable spectacles on earth” and did not try to save her marriage (Chopin 100). Love was sometimes not a factor that determined marriage; money and image was usually more preferred.

He never wanted her unhappy or upset with him. But no matter what he did, he was always at fault for something; Norma never seemed to be completely happy. All Torvald did was fire Krogstad, and his marriage went into jeopardy. Nora decided to leave. She’s not even taking their children with her. She tells Torvald that she’s “sure” she’ll think of him and the children often. Nora gave Torvald the keys to their home and told him it’s

Nora and Torvald have been married for a long time and they do their best to make sure they are happy. Nora loves Torvald very much and would do anything to

Later in Act I, her friend Mrs. Linde visits Nora. Even in their conversation Mrs. Linde comments on Nora's childish behavior. "Well my heavens - a little needlework and such - Nora, you're just a child." (Ibsen 1511). Nora quickly defends herself, in some sense to regain her standing within her own ranks. "I've also got something to be proud and happy for. I'm the one who saved Torvald's life." (Ibsen 1511). By doing this Nora is secretly undermining society and providing for her husband. In contrast to society beliefs at the time, shouldn't a wife provide for her husband in his sickness? Thus creating an interesting paradox passed upon wedding vows. Apparently not or Nora would have confided in Torvald sooner. "Mrs. Linde: And you've never confided..." (Ibsen 1512).

For the Canadian (Western European) case study, the concept of love or at least its modern interpretation began during the 11th century CE, with the troubadours of Provence, France. Before that, there was no true concept of romantic love only arranged marriages or marriages that would cement alliances. Now people marry strictly for romantic reasons were two people get together and eventually fall in love with each other. Most people want a commitment from someone to stay together. When it comes to the concept of marriage Western marriages are monogamous, that stipulates a union between two people. However, though, the concept of divorce is becoming more prevalent as time progresses and the idea of remarrying

Mrs. Linde married her late husband, because he was “well off” at the time, and she needed to take care of her mother and two brothers. She tells Nora “I don’t think I was justified in refusing his offer” (of marriage) (Rosefeldt). It is unclear why her late husband offered a proposal to her, but her actions can be thought of as beneficial to herself, as well as pleasing to him. He wanted a wife, and she needed money. Society plays a role in her character as well. It was expected of the male gender to “take care of” the woman, only this included the needs of her family as well. “Christine then offered to help Nora escape her troubles with Krogstad by marrying him (Benedict). Because she did have eyes for him earlier in her life, her intentions seem selfless, but again not for true reasons.

Another main difference between Torvald and Nora is how much their self-image matters to them individually. Nora's self-image is the complete opposite of Torvalds. From Nora's perspective she doesn't have much of an image to produce, but she does have the image of herself that Torvald can see along with her close friends. She really cares about what her husband thinks about her so she does whatever she can to make sure that his opinion doesn’t change, she gets worried by how she will look in his eyes after he finds out about the crime she has committed, this is why she tries to stop Torvald from sending Krogstad his notice, "Call it back, Torvald! There's still time. Oh, Torvald, call it back!..."(1304) Nora acts like this because once Torvald finds out what she has done, she knows that he is going to look at her a different way than what he does now. Nora doesn’t want this so she tries preventing Torvald from doing his job. On the other hand, Torvald cares a lot about the way others look at him, he thinks that once people find out what his wife has done that it will destroy his reputation and people will tend to look down upon him. When he finds out about what his wife has done

Torvald’s wife Nora is the center of several of the traits that classify him as a morally ambiguous character. Nora is more like a possession to Torvald than a soul mate or wife. She is like a doll to him, something that he can control and shape into what he wants. Nora is treated like a child and as if she can not function a second without him to be there to tell her what to do. Her dependency on him is extremely important to him because that is