Comparing Democracy And Authoritarian Governments

Governments were created as a way to oversee groups of people and to serve as a source of protection from threatening forces. However, all governments are not the same as there are various categories of administration. These include democracy, theocracy, communism, republic, dictatorship, monarchy, and fascism. The two types of government that will be discussed in this research paper are a republic and a communist style of governing. As these are two very opposite branches of ruling, the similarities between them will be few and far between. The differences will range from education, religion, and economics with extreme variations in each category.

In an autocracy, one person has all the power. The person can gain their power by being related to the previous ruler, and then it would be also known as a monarchy. Andorra is an example of a current monarchy. Sometimes force is used to attain and hold authority, this is known as a dictatorship. North Korea is a dictatorship, with Kim Jong Un being the dictator. Theocracies can also be autocracies when there is a single religious leader who controls the government, such as Iran. ("Governments: How Do They Run?"). This government system is very fast at making decisions and this can be helpful

Comparing the U.S. governments ability to meet the needs of its citizens compared to that of a dictatorship is far superior. A dictatorship is designed to benefit one or few individuals that have achieved power using capital or force. Their only concern is for themselves and what will increase their power. The U.S. form of government is restricted to the power of the constitution.

There are many types of modern and historic governments. The form of government a nation has is influenced by their past government and the specific circumstances in the country. There are many variations of essentially similar forms of government. All forms of government can be simplified into a classification as either limited or unlimited.

Those who are in power are not accountable to constituencies and public policy does not derive from social consent. Within sociology and political science, particularly within comparative politics, authoritarianism has been understood as a modern type of political regime. Therefore, the concept focuses on the way of accessing, exercising, and organizing power, on the nature of the belief system, and the role of citizens in the political

With the human civilization is progressing, there are several kinds of political system appeared in the world. It seems that an important reason that results in some countries are democratic or some countries not. Therefore, this essay will discuss 2 countries America and Cuba, which are liberal democracy country and non-democracy (authoritarian regime) country respectively. What are liberal democracies and authoritarian regime? What class of politics system runs in those two countries? How does politics system runs in those two countries and changes them. Following will help to further show what above is. This essay will also compare the some aspects of them, which are economics, party of country, human right.

Other forms of government is Anarchy (everyone or no one) , Monarchy and Dictatorship ( ruled by one, king or queen). Two forms of government is Dictatorship and Democracy. We have direct democracy where individuals vote directly. Dictatorship is the ruling of one. Although there are different sorts of dictatorship, we have communism which is the government structure that only meets the basic needs of its population. The Monarchy dictatorship is the subcategory, where the people in power have the power by birth right and are inherited. These two types of government are totally opposite of each other and they both have their advantages and

The major differences between democratic, authoritarian, and anarchic political systems are who holds the power, who has freedom/how much, and how much involvement the government has in the workings of its country. For authoritarian states, the power is held mainly by a single person or an elite group of people, few people have freedom, with what freedom they have being limited, and the government, or rather the leader/leaders, is involved in almost every aspect of the country from controlling the economy to making decisions for the lifestyles of its citizens like deciding how many kids they may have or what hair styles are approved. Everything is at the whim of those in charge and can change at any second. Anarchic is the exact opposite of this. In an anarchic government, everyone has power all the power they can take for themselves, nothing is unpermitted as there are no laws and since a government doesn’t exist, it can’t have any involvement in anything. Finally there is the democratic system which is a happy medium between these two extremes. In a democracy, everyone has some power through the right to vote directly or for elected officials who will run the country (who are limited by a constitution of some kind), everyone has freedom within the country’s generally reasonable laws, and government involvement is limited to making laws and regulations within reason to protect its citizens, economy, etc. For example, you would not see a democratic nation forbidding speaking

A dictatorship is a singly ruled government. One person is in charge of everything and makes the rules. Everyone has to go by what the dictator says. Nobody has a say in what goes on regarding anything. The dictator can make up whatever laws he or she wants and they do not have to be run by anyone. In a Democracy the president still has to run things by the congress and there are steps that need to be done in order for something to be approved. In a dictatorship what the ruler says goes and that is the end of it. The United States is not really similar to a dictatorship at all. The only things that are kind of similar are laws, because in either case the community still has to follow the laws or else there will be consequences. Another thing

I am going to discuss a constitutional democracy form of government and a dictator form of government. We in America live under a constitutional democracy. First, a democracy, as most know is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). A constitutional democracy affords protections of the people from those elected to lead the government ensuring their rights are not violated (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). These protections come from the foundation of the created society and backed up by law (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). Unlike a dictatorship, our democracy may be overseen by those elected to power, however, the people ultimately retain that power (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). In a way, there is a form of dictatorship in our

Dictatorship is a type of government in which the people have to follow strict guidelines for their behavior that the government sets forth. For example, Hitler set forth strict policies and guidelines for Germany. In countries, like Cuba under dictatorship rule it can create an increase in crime within communities due to food shortages by limits set by the government. In a system of democracy, in places like the United States, the filibustering between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party can create an unbalance of power shifting the power group’s focus. Republicans are more conservative in their ideals and are more resistant to policy changes. While, Democrats are more liberal and want promote new ideas for the policy agenda. So, the parties play a major role in creating societal issues because it provides division between groups of people due to contrasting ideals. Republic governments elect people like democracies to govern their government and also deal with the issue of corruption and whether officials are really campaigning for their citizens. An Aristocratic government structured with elected officials of a

Authoritarianism is a form of government in which the leader or leaders have exclusive power concerning matters of the state. Although these

In these systems, the regimes possess some of these characteristics but have found ways to manipulate the system to consolidate their power. “Rather than openly violating democratic rules (for example, by banning or repressing the opposition and the media), incumbents are more likely to use bribery, co-optation, and more subtle forms of persecution, such as the use of tax authorities, compliant judiciaries, and other state agencies to ‘legally’ harass, persecute, or extort cooperative behavior from critics” . While it is apparent that these regimes are not fully democratic, it would be unfair to label them as fully authoritarian either. Unlike traditional totalitarian governments, the persistence of true democratic institutions in competitive authoritarian regimes allows the opposition to contest, weaken and occasionally even defeat autocratic incumbents. While these situations are generally uncommon, these situations are possible in competitive authoritarianism due to four independent means, the electoral arena, the legislature, the judiciary and the media. These four branches are virtually independent of the executive control however, unlike in democracies, the competitive authoritarian regimes use its power to undermine their independence. “In regards to the electoral arena, large-scale abuses of state power, biased media coverage, harassment of opposition candidates and activists are widespread, legislatures tend to be relatively weak, the

The second type of government is a republic. A republic is any government that does not have a monarch. Republics are also divided into three classes. A republic can be classified as a dictatorship, an oligarchy, or a democracy.

Under an authoritarian regime, specifically a dictatorship, the ruler has the political and executive power to persecute an individual or group for political reasons, which demonstrates a form of political oppression.