In the novels, The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, similar characteristics are seen in the actions of the main characters, Dorian Gray and Victor Frankenstein. The most present characteristic in both is a lack of compassion, and both watch that flaw grow outside themselves in an external representation of that monstrosity. Wilde and Shelley portray their main character’s monstrous actions and intent using either the physical or the supernatural world which shows that a monster can appear in any context. By comparing their main characters uncompassionate actions and intent with the plainly monstrous results of those actions and intentions, the authors give the message that a monster is both made with and …show more content…
A man’s surrounding society is clear for the most part on its accepted values and morals, and they don’t necessarily match up with that society’s system of justice. For instance, in today’s society, it is considered monstrous by a majority of the millennial generation for any person to judge another based on their looks, abilities, ranking, or dollar value: despite such judgement being a common occurrence within those same millennials. A man making judgements on a surface level tells people he is shallow, and when a man’s thoughts lie in a shallow pool, he can be considered potentially monstrous. However, a man can not be put in jail for calling someone a derogatory term, or for criticising genetic features in others. These offenses are not punishable by law due to their minority in respect to monstrous actions such as theft, assault, or murder. Yet still in these major offenses, intent holds its importance more than ever. “Intent is [such] a critical element in many crimes,” that the United States justice system split it into categories of “specific” and “general intent” (Stover 2-5). In order to best judge if a man guilty of murder deserves years in jail, months in jail, or no jail at all, the American justice system separates the crime into degrees: degrees of murder. These degrees are based on the intent behind the killing. If a man has a heart attack at the wheel of his car, causing him to crash into another car, killing four other people, should he go to jail for murder? According to the justice system, he would not go to jail, nor would he be charged with anything but medical bills. This lack of punishment is in direct correlation to a lack of harmful intent. The man who had a heart attack had absolutely no intention of killing people or of even having a heart attack, so his conscience and his record should potentially remain
I can compare Frankenstein to the movie I saw by Tim Burton, Frankenweenie. They are similar but instead of a human body, it was a dog and the mad scientist was a young boy named Victor Frankenstein. The young Victor Frankenstein brings his dog back to life after being hit by a car for a science fair project while the real Victor Frankenstein wanted to create a real life human. Just like the real Frankenstein monster, the dog brings trouble. In the book, the mad scientist, denies the monster but in Frankenweenie, the young boy convinces his family and friends to like his creation. Some of his classmates had known the young Victor Frankenstein creation and was intrigued to do the same experiment like his but it went out of the standards of
Like most horror stories, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has a wretched monster who terrorizes and kills his victims with ease. However, the story is not as simple as it seems. One increasingly popular view of the true nature of the creature is one of understanding. This sympathetic view is often strengthened by looking at the upbringing of the creature in the harsh world in which he matures much as a child would. With no friends or even a true father, the creature can be said to be a product of society and its negative views and constant rejections of him. Although this popular view serves to lessen the severity of his crimes in most people’s eyes, the fact remains that the creature is in fact a cold-hearted wretch whose vindictive nature
Embarking on the quest for forbidden knowledge and usurping the role by acting as gods, are ethically questioned actions that have been explored in literature. Examining "Frankenstein" written by Mary Shelley and "Edward Scissorhands" directed by Tim Burton, individuals view an expounded exploration of human nature. Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" looks into the consequences of Victor Frankenstein's reckless pursuit of creating life, which can be explored through Gothic elements of monstrous creations and the Romantic exploration of individual ambition. Similarly, Tim Burton's "Edward Scissorhands" paints a vivid picture of societal rejection and the power of mother nature, blending Gothic elements with Romantic themes to exhibit the complexities of human nature. Forbidden knowledge
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, the unnamed creature brings terror to civilians and commits horrific acts against his creator, Victor Frankenstein. However, his redeemable acts of kindness makes his character morally ambiguous. He struggles between doing well and causing trouble because of isolation, the excerpts of society, and his pursuit for love.
In Shelley’s Frankenstein, the monster is portrayed as a grotesque abomination. However, as Hopkins states in Contending Forces, the cultural and geographical situations, or lack thereof, in which one matures in play a crucial role in the proper development of one’s mind and brain. The monster is simply a product of circumstance. The lack of social interactions alongside geographical isolation propelled the daemon to be alienated from society, ultimately resulting in a lack of morals and an underdeveloped psyche. By being a culmination of his surroundings and experiences it is revealed that the true monstrous entities are the factors that leave the daemon predisposed to fail in a modern society. Arguably, Victor created a being, while the circumstances that said being was placed in “created” a monster. Shelley purposefully terrorizes the monster with such intensity to provoke and justify the overarching theme in this novel which states that people should not be judged on their physical appearance.
Victor Frankenstein is in many ways more monstrous than the monster he created. Victor and his creation demonstrate a thesis-antithesis correspondence wherein they reflect opposite character traits. Victor has no sense of empathy or compassion, whereas the monster, although hideous and rejected by society as an outcast, has
Stories of monsters have captivated readers attention since the very beginning even though the definition of what a monster is perceived to be is complex and vague. The word monster and its meaning in today’s culture is very opinionated. Most people think of monsters in an evil sense because of what todays pop-culture has depicted a monster out to be. Shelley’s and Wilde’s intentions for monsters were not to be taken out of context from how they originated. Shelly and Wilde saw monsters in the people and in the world surrounding them. Upon viewing this they recognized the true fear of determining one's identity. Once they viewed this event through the eyes of the people, they deemed necessary that they should provide a lesson by writing Frankenstein and The Picture of Dorian Gray. The lesson of the two books are that if the creator can not handle the responsibilities of the creation process, then the creation will fail. If the creation fails, then ultimately the creator fails and the true colors of mankind are shown.
The novel Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley in 1818. This gothic romance novel tells the story of a philosopher who discovered how to create life, without the full knowledge that his actions could cause grave consequences. Universal Studios made the film version of this novel in 1931. Unfortunately, the film version of Frankenstein has more differences than similarities to the novel. In the novel, Victor’s mental obsession seems to be more severe than in the film. The character of Victor Frankenstein was portrayed in both the novel and the film as a veriphobe, or one who is afraid of the truth, in this case, the truth of his actions. He
Though Victor Frankenstein and his creation both have qualities that are clearly monstrous, Victor’s selfishness, his abandonment of his responsibilities, and his inability to recognize his own faults and the monstrous qualities within himself qualities within himself make him the true monster while his creation is rather the opposite.
The topic of appearance and judgment is greatly exemplified in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as it becomes apparent that
Mary W. Shelley’s brilliant gothic story, Frankenstein, is one that emits the prevalent theme of light versus dark, in which possesses obvious characteristics of a novel written during the romantic era. The novel tells the account of the overambitious Victor Frankenstein, who created a monster in hopes that he’d be known for crafting something human from the body parts of corpses with physical and mental advantages in society, basically playing the part of God on Earth, but through the auspices of science. Instead of creating a “normal” human, his creation ended up being a disfigured creature who he then neglects. Upon his abandonment, the monster seeks revenge on Victor after being cast away by society due to harsh physiognomy in which
Is a healthy mind the result of a healthy body? Careful analysis of available literature certainly agrees that it can be, however it is often unclear why.
The Fall of the House of Usher is a short story written by Edgar Allen Poe in the year 1839. This short story is complexly written, with challenging themes such as romanticism, identity, and fear. Poe utilizes many elements of the Gothic Tradition such as setting and supernatural elements to create a more enigmatic story, and uses language to his benefit, employing adjective filled descriptions of literal elements that also serve as analogies for other parts of this tale.
The thing that makes Nelly meet the criteria as an proficient narrator is her quality as a close friend. Nelly always listened to everybody, and I have a feeling that she wanted to know. Like when Catherine asked her to keep a secret ; Nelly asked if it was worth keeping . She could've walked away and said no, but she sat there and talked about it. If Nelly wasn't the confidant to them all, we wouldn't have known what Heathcliff did on the night that Catherine was buried, what he did to Catherine's grave ,how Catherine really felt about Heathcliff, how Isabella was being treated or that Heathcliff's been preoccupied by Catherine's spirit for eighteen years. Only Nelly knows all of these important things in the story and