preview

Comparing Dorian Gray And Frankenstein

Decent Essays
Open Document

In the novels, The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, similar characteristics are seen in the actions of the main characters, Dorian Gray and Victor Frankenstein. The most present characteristic in both is a lack of compassion, and both watch that flaw grow outside themselves in an external representation of that monstrosity. Wilde and Shelley portray their main character’s monstrous actions and intent using either the physical or the supernatural world which shows that a monster can appear in any context. By comparing their main characters uncompassionate actions and intent with the plainly monstrous results of those actions and intentions, the authors give the message that a monster is both made with and …show more content…

A man’s surrounding society is clear for the most part on its accepted values and morals, and they don’t necessarily match up with that society’s system of justice. For instance, in today’s society, it is considered monstrous by a majority of the millennial generation for any person to judge another based on their looks, abilities, ranking, or dollar value: despite such judgement being a common occurrence within those same millennials. A man making judgements on a surface level tells people he is shallow, and when a man’s thoughts lie in a shallow pool, he can be considered potentially monstrous. However, a man can not be put in jail for calling someone a derogatory term, or for criticising genetic features in others. These offenses are not punishable by law due to their minority in respect to monstrous actions such as theft, assault, or murder. Yet still in these major offenses, intent holds its importance more than ever. “Intent is [such] a critical element in many crimes,” that the United States justice system split it into categories of “specific” and “general intent” (Stover 2-5). In order to best judge if a man guilty of murder deserves years in jail, months in jail, or no jail at all, the American justice system separates the crime into degrees: degrees of murder. These degrees are based on the intent behind the killing. If a man has a heart attack at the wheel of his car, causing him to crash into another car, killing four other people, should he go to jail for murder? According to the justice system, he would not go to jail, nor would he be charged with anything but medical bills. This lack of punishment is in direct correlation to a lack of harmful intent. The man who had a heart attack had absolutely no intention of killing people or of even having a heart attack, so his conscience and his record should potentially remain

Get Access