preview

Comparing Euripides Medea And Shakespeare's The Tempest

Decent Essays
Open Document

Euripides’ Medea and Shakespeare’s The Tempest both explore the role of gender through leading female characters who intentionally or unintentionally break the societal expectations of women, acting masculinely whilst upholding feminine characteristics. The similar historical context of both plays is important when considering the anticipated behaviour of women in each time period. The femininity of Shakespeare’s Miranda, which stems from her purity and attractiveness, is treated as a desired commodity which results in conflict between male characters while Medea’s femininity arises from her role as a wife and mother. In each play, the female character acts masculinely under the guise of femininity, protected by their attractiveness and how …show more content…

The societies presented in Medea and The Tempest orchestrate women to fulfil domestic, submissive roles, regardless of the difference in setting. Euripides’ Medea is set in a patriarchal society, where women have minimal rights and are expected to follow their husbands. Medea, a foreign woman who “knows from bitter loss what it means to have once had a homeland” (Euripides, n.d. :2) has not been raised in Greek society but is nonetheless expected to follow rules of behaviour. 5th Century Ancient Greek men were dominant yet fearful of powerful women (Vasillopulos, 2014: 42). Vasillopulos (2014: 43) quotes Robert Meagher, who suggests ‘the bearing of legitimate children’ and wifehood were the main functions of women in Ancient Greek society. Medea fulfils both these functions, as she is a faithful wife to Jason and a mother of two children. Similarly, Miranda has been raised on an island by her father, Prospero, following their exile from Milan, therefore, to some extent, she is excluded from societal expectations. As The Tempest was written

Get Access