preview

Comparing George Orwells '1984 And Fritz Lang's' Metropolis

Decent Essays
Open Document

In George Orwell’s ‘1984’ and Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’, context shapes both the representations and interpretations of the significant ideas of social inequality, and rebellion and revolution. Both narratives depict dystopian societies and deal with economic and social issues relevant to their contexts. When these ideas are compared, the audiences understanding of 1984’s and Metropolis’ values and contexts is enhanced. Orwell shows how the abuse of authority affects social inequality to make the reader reflect on their own position in the class system. This is represented through the political system “INGSOC” where “Big Brother is the guise in which the Party chooses to exhibit itself to the world.” Orwell’s depiction of Big Brother as a …show more content…

By literally building Metropolis on inequality, Lang exposes his audience to the class system where, the poor live “deep below the earth’s surface [in] the workers’ city” and the rich live in the “Club of the Sons.” Lang immediately establishes the negative class differences that capitalism causes through his use of low key lighting in the worker’s city, which, when combined with the grey costuming of the workers, maximises the effect of dullness. Lang then extends this effect by suggesting the workers are machine like, through dissolving from images of machines to the workers, and then showing the workers moving in a slow, and synchronised fashion. Lang then contrasts these dreary images with high key lighting, and joyful music to emphasise the jubilant nature of the “Club of the Sons.” Lang’s presentation of class systems reflects his context of how wealthy industrialists held a lot of power, whilst the middle and working class suffered from hyperinflation and the economic impact of Versailles. Lang’s contrast thoroughly shows the unfavourable class inequalities that capitalism causes, and ‘Metropolis’, much like ‘1984’, serves as a warning against that …show more content…

“Thought crime does not entail death; though crime is death.” Orwell’s use of high modal language in describing thoughtcrime, demonstrates that “it was reasonably certain that [committing thoughtcrime] would be punished by death.” distinctly reflecting how Hitler used the Gestapo to maintain order and control, by eliminating political opponents. Orwell’s use of the motif “Two plus two equals four” is essential for representing Winston’s rebellion, underscoring Orwell’s ideas of rebellion. The axiom is challenged by O’Brien, claiming “[The Party] control[s] matter because [they] control the mind. Reality is inside the skull.” Orwell’s use of the false dogma “two plus two equals five” reflects how totalitarians get their citizens to become incapable of having a self because they become unable to hold an objective reality. The Party in this sense in suppressing Winston’s rebellion because once Winston concedes that “whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth” his reality becomes based on “INGSOC.” Thus, through Orwell exploring how totalitarians maintain their power, he exposes the consequences of rebellion and revolution, ultimately resulting in Winston becoming a victim of “doublethink” meaning “he [wins] the victory over himself [and loves] Big

Get Access