preview

Comparing Gustave Courbet's A Burial At Ornans

Good Essays
Open Document

In the area of modernism exist two visionaries responsible for redefining the way in which art is perceived. Ahead of their time, Gustave Courbet and Edouard Manet revolutionized the art world both technically and stylistically, with their risqué content and bizarre technique. Throughout their careers, each artist broke societal norms and pushed through artistic boundaries in order to showcase reality through their paintings and thus, give rise to modernism.

Courbet and Manet can both be described as eccentric and rebellious, each wanting to distance himself from his father’s desire for a lawyer as a son (Berman 2008) (Tucker 15) to instead create art his own way, whether it was in what he chose to paint or the way in which he painted it. …show more content…

His direction varied, however, because unlike other artists of his time, he chose to include every aspect of life within his work, whether it was good or bad, beautiful or ugly. This realistic and naturalistic approach to art is evident in several of his works, including the very famous “A Burial at Ornans,” in which the artist illustrates a funeral in his hometown. This piece created a stir among art critics because they did not believe common people, nor morbid scenes, had a place in serious artwork (2008). At the time, artistry focussed on cheery scenes of haute Parisian events, people, or landscapes, which aided in discriminating between social classes. Courbet aimed therefore to diminish the gap between the wealthy and the common through his art; this notion is especially proven in “The Painter’s Studio”, in which the artist places himself between two differing social classes. Though Courbet was born into an affluent family, his wealth did not determine his stance on social justice issues like equality; this painting is therefore meant to showcase both sides with the artist as the balancing factor, communicating the message that his art is all inclusive. The artist wanted …show more content…

Though both artists received harsh judgement for not following guidelines with their techniques, they each continued to create art as they pleased and eventually were rewarded with prestige in the art world. Courbet, for instance, chose to paint using a palette knife and his thumb (2008). These out-of-the-ordinary tools received much criticism since most artists at the time used tools that would create a smooth, barely-there paint finish in their pieces. Contrarily, Courbet believed that “brushwork and paint texture should be emphasized, not concealed" (2008). His techniques are now commonly used among artists (2008), showing exactly how innovative and influential the painter was in his time and still to date. Just like Courbet, Manet also rejected artistic normality in favour of new ideas and techniques now widely used by other artists. An example of this lies in his choice of canvas size. For Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe. Manet chose a canvas size of 208 x 264 cm (Tucker 11), almost double the size of canvases ideal for his content type. Large canvases were reserved for scenes or people of historical, political or religious stature; most artists honoured this guideline until Manet came along. This was done purposefully, as Manet wanted to accord importance to his work and showcase his talents in a way that would surely generate buzz. Getting noticed was of the upmost importance to

Get Access