Taking reference from Geert Hofstede, a comparative culture profile is made comparing Nissan (Japan) to other similar businesses in Canada. Individualism vs collectivism: This dimension deals with how personal goals are taken into consideration versus how goals of a group are taken into consideration. People in individualist societies take great inspiration from personal success while people collectivist societies work best with people who they know.
Comparing Japan to Canada, Japan scored a 46 meaning that they present theirself as a more collective society.This means that they put the opinion of a group in front of the an individual’s opinions.With a score of 80, Canada has set itself as an individualist society. Similar to its American
…show more content…
Masculinity
When a country scores a high number in this category, this means that it categorized as a masculine society as opposed to countries scoring low numbers. This means that it is driven by competition,and desire for success. On the opposite, when a country has a low score, this means that the it is driven by caring for others is important as well as having a good quality of life.
With both of these countries scoring high numbers ( Japan 95, and Canada 52) , this means that they are both masculine societies driven by high competition, women are lesser found in management and they have a larger gender wage gap.(Hofstede (2001), Culture’s Consequences). One factor that separates Japan from Canada is that in a workplace, Japanese are highly motivated together as a group rather than working as individuals.
Uncertainty avoidance
This dimension deals explains how society prepares and deals against the unknown. In a country with a high uncertainty avoidance, people do not like change, thus rules are placed to avoid such situations. Countries with low uncertainty avoidance, people accept change, and more likely to take
…show more content…
On the other hand, in Canada is more accepting when these situation occur; and thus work on adapting and moving on.This makes decision making
Canadian workplaces today seem to be a fairly diverse place, with a blend of many religions, ethnicities, and genders present. However, although people preach affirmative action and melting pots in current times, many inequality and power issues still abound. One strikingly noticeable example is gender discrimination. Women in the workforce face many challenges like smaller wages, harassment, male privilege in hiring or promotions, and lack of support when pregnant or raising children. One half of the planet is women, and it can be assumed the same for Canada, but they still face judgment at work because they lack the authority to dispute against big corporations or even their male supervisor. It cannot be argued that
Japanese people have had a very vivid history in Canada. Before 1868, it was illegal for Japanese citizens to leave the country, but with a change in government in the 1870s, they were encouraged to travel overseas to earn money and learn skills that they could bring home, as Japan in the early 20th century did not hold a lot of opportunity, especially in rural areas. In
The Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions seek to explain the culture of a country along five dimensions power distance, individuality, masculinity/femininity, uncertainty avoidance and long term orientation. Power distance reflects the degree to which a culture is accepting of differences in power. The higher the score, the more the country accepts inequalities among the people in the culture. The United Kingdom scores 35 and Japan 54. This means that the UK is in particular a low power distance culture, in that the people in the culture generally do not tolerate inequality in the society. For a society that has historically been class-based, this is an interesting finding, but Britain has also been home to many Enlightenment thinkers and their ideals about equality. Japan is a mildly hierarchical society with its score, and Japanese people are generally conscious of their hierarchical position. Japan tends to be fairly hierarchical in a business
The decision to leave one’s home country is never an easy one. The courage to pursue one’s dreams no matter what the costs requires strength and persistence. For many, Canada represents a beacon of hope or a light at the end of a tunnel. It is a land of peace, tranquility, beauty and diversity. Canada has become a safe haven for survivors of war, persecution and injustice but it is also a place where people are accepted for their differences and are free to live without fear of oppression. Before Confederation, our country was being colonized by the British and the French. In these early days, Canada was viewed as an opportunity to build a new life. Throughout history, Canada’s immigration policies have evolved contributing to Canada’s image as a multicultural nation. Many immigrate to Canada seeking employment or refuge, while others are sponsored by family members. However, everyone dreams of building a better life for themselves and for future generations.
The purpose of this report is to look into the culture analysis of Japan, dealing with the country’s culture and business culture. Japan is a country whereby one can have many travel adventures at. I for one am greatly attracted by the scenery japan offers. Japan has always been such a joy to visit and the culture they offered is defiantly one of my favorite, period. For example, the Japanese language is one of the sixth most spoken in the world.
Japan has a history of formality and of family, The United States has a history of expansion and individualism. These two cultures are both similar and different as expected, but which one is better? Taking a look at what makes them different would decide that. We will look at different aspects of life that differ such as food, housing, societal culture, and the economies of these two cultures. One look at the typical diets of these two shows an obvious difference, Japan is all about the freshness of their food, while The United States are care more about convenience, this comes down to the type of food eaten by both cultures.
As one may know, cultural aspects differ between a myriad of countries. In particular, Japan is a traditional yet historical society that is worlds apart from the familiar United States. Specifically, Geert Hofstede and Edward T. Hall conducted a study based on cultural influences in relation to the workplace as well as characteristics of a high context society. However, it is vital to recognize Japan’s business norms and customs, culture, and etiquette before one’s journey begins.
Japans earliest written record were found in Chinese source. Japan and China are very similar in many ways. Many of the Chinese culture had been adapted in to the Japanese cultures
The cultural value model that is being used in this outline is Hofstede’s Model. Although Japan and America have quite a few economic and technologic similarities, they contrast in many ways. The biggest difference between these two countries is Individualism vs. Collectivism. Hofstede himself finds that both of these cultures differ significantly on most these diminesions (Shah).
One main difference between individualistic and collectivistic cultures is that people with an individualistic culture, more often than not, put a great emphasis on their own personal independence, decision making, and success as an individual, where collectivistic cultures are more concerned with succeeding as a group or as an entity. Additionally, people from individualistic cultures are more likely to put emphasis on standing out as an individual at work or regarding something they are good at, for example in a professional setting or in the office. If they did well, they are happy if they are personally recognized
Japan with a score of 46, this means that this is a country that appreciates the collectivist culture. It depicts several aspects of collectivist characteristics such as understanding groups more than the individualistic values.
Japan scored 54 points on a scale of 0-100 in the power distance category, meaning that they have a more hierarchical structure (unlike most of the other Asian countries), which the Japanese consider as accurate. To prevent unilateral decision-making and the exercise of power in a company, the decision-making processes usually has to go through all hierarchical levels and requires final approval of the top management layer.
Now, this score is based on four factors: economic participation and opportunity (which is essentially Japanese women in the workplace), educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment. Japan does really well in educational attainment and health and survival. The scores that hurt Japan the most are the ones related to women in the work place. It's well-known that Japanese women don't have the same job opportunities as men in Japan. The number one reason I hear about this is because Japanese women
The fourth dimension of Hofstede’s paradigm understands how society deals with the unknown. If a country has a low uncertainty avoidance they believe that whatever will happen will happen. Low avoidance indicates that they do not have much control or want to have much control on the future. In comparison a high uncertainty avoidance indicates that a country is structured in a way to try as best as possible to be in control of the future. For instance, a high avoidance society has made advanced plans to take into account resources needed in a natural disaster.
Individualism: The individualism dimension of a culture is where individuals are expected to take care of only themselves and their immediate families. The opposite is collectivism, where an individual is loyal to a particular in-group.