preview

Comparing Kierkegaard's The Myth Of Sisyphus

Decent Essays

In contrast to Kierkegaard’s work, Albert Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus did not use any metaphysical connections to answer existential questions. In contrast to the leap of faith, Camus believed we must embrace the absurd by living in it. According to Camus, there is no existential meaning to life and therefore we must create our own meaning. We must extract meaning from arts and explore the infinite possibilities of our creative minds. “It was previously a question of finding out whether or not life had to have a meaning to be lived. It now becomes clear, on the contrary, that it will be lived all the better if it has no meaning” 53 In embracing the absurd, we receive a unique opportunity of seizing and embracing awareness.

It caught my attention me when Camus mentioned becoming a slave of our liberty. He prefaced how even though we believe we are living a life of liberty and choices; …show more content…

I struggled to understand Kierkegaard because I— myself don’t believe in God so understanding the leap and the concept of suspension in front of God was really hard to get past. Despite not connecting to Kierkegaard’s perspective, it makes sense. It makes sense that if we are finite beings we must reach for faith because that is the only infinite form that can bridge our souls. However, reading Campus was refreshing. Camus was a dose of positivity that made me think of shifting my attitude and mindset towards life. Reflecting back, I do feel like my understanding of existentialism has broaden not only my academic knowledge, but has shaken and shifted my beliefs as a person. Despite not agreeing with some with some existential writers, it was not about agreeing or disagreeing with these views as it was about understanding the different perspectives on life from an existential

Get Access