Comparing Lawson And Vandivier

However, the Charger did not fare so well in side-impact crash tests, earning the second worst score from IIHS. Safety features for the Charger include antilock disc brakes as well as standard side curtain airbags.

The bill then went to the senate where there was much debate and procrastination. Many senators opposed to the bill tried to use the “filibuster” technique, which basically is an extended talk for the purpose of killing a bill or getting drastic modifications. In fact, it was the longest debate in Senate history lasting 534 hours in total. The final vote in the Senate was 76 to 18 to pass their version of the bill since they made minor amendments to it (Bureau of National Affairs 18-21). A quote from Senator John Lesinski, democrat, showed why some were opposed to the bill, “There are still many private rights in America that under our Constitution are beyond the power of government to regulate and one of these is the right to pick and chose one’s associates, one’s friends and one’s customers in a private business” (Calls Bill Unconstitutional 33). The final vote in the House over the amendments the senate made was 289 to 126. This set the way for the bill to be signed by the President to become a law.

(Document E). In the minds of many Americans, the senate did indeed

“All the brakes were tested with a 180mm rotor and a 50Nm force on the lever (1N is the amount of force required to accelerate 1kg at 1m/s2), with the stock pads. To fully bed in the rotors and pads, the brakes were given 60 one-second pulls at 15km/h, followed by 30 two-second pulls at 20km/h. After a 30-second cooling-down period, the testing began.

This also influenced his decision very much. The president had to decide which decision was the

Once the accusations based on almost nonexistent evidence became too much for the American people to further bear, the senatorial colleagues began to investigate the rogue Senator and his findings. The investigation was a televised broadcast of thirty six days’ worth or hearings of the Senator. As the American public viewed the hearings, the exposure of the Senator began to cause doubts by the public viewers of the program. Coming to a head on June 9, 1954, it took only six months for Senate to vote to censure McCarthy. The final vote was 67-22 against the

There were other measures that formed this bill, but it was the muckraking that pushed for the timing of the bill. One measure was public interests. During this time period many people began to question the quality of their food and how it was being processed. Also locals would write about such instances, such as when Adams wrote about the quality of the machines that came in contact with the meat. This outraged many citizens causing many groups to bombard Congress with their concerns.

the task force and months of speculation, a 1000 page document was presented to Congress

Another example of one of these issues that emerged from this affair was one of propaganda. While the Administration and Congress can appeal directly to the people for support of their positions, appropriated funds may not be used to generate propaganda or covert propaganda activities. Congress found that the Office for Public Diplomacy for Latin America and the Caribbean were issuing white propaganda activities that violated the ban on covert propaganda overseas (Reclaiming the Congressional Hearing, 2015). In respect to what was happening in Iran, Congress made it clear that a joint decision with the House and the Senate would have rejected the proposal to sell arms to Iran, but since it was not reported to Congress, their inability to react was clear to the public. The end of the congressional hearing emphasized that this affair was founded on dishonesty and secrecy, morals that do not align with the Constitution and fellow Americans (Journal, 2011). And while some involved cited fear of leaks as a justification for their practices. The final report Congress made on the matter ended with a rather unenlightening thought which was that “all of the fact may never be known”, placing more confusion and distrust in the American public. So, why was this hearing important, if it was at

The drum break had a main problem and that is that the heat within is not efficiently disbursed. Since the drum prevents wind from drawing it away. The heat produced inside the drum does not easily escape. The disk brake however was open to the wind, allowing the heat to be easily carried away, increasing the efficiency of the break.

topic. What the public wanted was the truth and accountability of actions that had taken

The Final Notice of Rulemaking was published in 1976 and identified 30 disputed areas of fact. These were the focus of six public hearings that were held from April through August of 1976. There were 315 witnesses, many of which provided anecdotal evidence. There was very little empirical data such as surveys and valid economic studies.

The other ethical decision for IWC to consider was the working conditions of the factory. This was a rumor that was pass through the grapevine.

source of information in the report, you give the name(s) of the author(s) and the date of

a skid. But it is firm, continuous brake pressure that is required to activate anti-locks, which