Comparing Machiavelli And Nietzsche's Power

forms of power are certainly more effective than others. The key to realizing power most

Power is the ultimate goal of many throughout their life. If power is taken advantage of it

Machiavelli’s interpretation of human nature was greatly shaped by his belief in God. In his writings, Machiavelli conceives that humans were given free will by God, and the choices made with such freedom established the innate flaws in humans. Based on that, he attributes the successes and failure of princes to their intrinsic weaknesses, and directs his writing towards those faults. His works are rooted in how personal attributes tend to affect the decisions one makes and focuses on the singular commanding force of power. Fixating on how the prince needs to draw people’s support, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of doing what is best for the greater good. He proposed that working toward a selfish goal, instead of striving towards a better state, should warrant punishment. Machiavelli is a practical person and always thought of pragmatic ways to approach situations, applying to his notions regarding politics and

Power is not only necessary in our life, it's desired as well. Power has a positive effect on people because it gives us order in our daily life.

Hitler shows how Machiavelli’s advice is relevant in today’s leaders. One reason is that he ruled with fear. In chapter 7 it states, “ Because of fear or hatred that makes men attack each other. (chapter 7)” This shows that fear makes a ruler want to attack other men for land or states. It also shows that Hitler rules with fear because he started attacking people which led into World War II. Also, on chapter 17 it states, “ … is it better to be loved rather than feared,or vice versa?...it is much safer to be feared than loved.(chapter 17)” This shows that Hitler ruled with fear instead of being loved because he knew that he must be feared to be a good ruler, It also shows that Hitler knew

In the excerpt “On the Doctrine of the Feeling of Power”, it reads, “An easy prey is something contemptible for proud natures; they take delight only at the sight of unbroken persons who could become their enemies”. I do not agree with Nietzsche's ideas on power, for his philosophy seems to be “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”. My ideas on power are more so like El Patron’s ideas from The House of the Scorpion. In the book, The House of the Scorpion, El Patron’s ideas on power are as follows, “Get rid of your enemies when you can.” These two quotes are distinctly different. Personally, I agree more with El Patron’s take on power, for due to personal experiences, my thoughts are that ones who seek power do not take delight

Machiavelli’s discussion on The Prince reveals the qualities of a prince and goes into depth on how it is better to be feared than to be loved. Machiavelli discussed how fear conserves leadership better. Men are afraid of punishment when it comes to fear and in the concept of love, man’s interests break because of the ties of obligation. When these two statements are being compared to the Holocaust, Machiavelli would side with Hitler. He states how a leader should make

Nietzsche’s writing about power dynamics and the creation of the “strong” and “weak,” the “good” and the “bad,” is very closely intertwined with the workings of fascist ideology, and how it understands itself to be “strong.” In a Nietzschean sense, however, fascism ultimately fails to be truly “strong” because it creates itself as a reformed moralistic approach to power, rather than freeing itself from moralism. More specifically, the construction of the Jews as “weak” by those who subscribe to fascist ideology, and the portrayal of themselves as “strong,”is almost wholly antithetical Nietzsche’s actual position concerning power dynamics. Instead, as Nietzsche lays out in The Genealogy of Morals, real power is

Power can be used as a weapon in today's world for good or bad. Power is a very strong thing people can obtain. It can be used to manipulate and make everything easier with one's life. Power also comes with other things such as confidence people with power are not afraid to take risk and challenges head on. A sign of power in world events are like when Hitler had total domination over germany and the jews. Hitler started to get people to believe him because of the economic depression that had hit the country, and also the trust they had in their weak government since the defeat of WW1. Hitler was a powerful and fascinating who attracted a big following of Germans desperate for change. Having too much power can have an effect on people also,

On the one hand, Nietzsche was an individual who would see the value of extremities in life arguing to not follow leaders while never forcing his followers, while on the other hand, Machiavelli had his teaching passed through the realm of leadership to be followed. I believe Machiavelli would take a keen interest in Nietzsche’s teachings from the fact he talks about standing up to implemented values, and where those values came from, one of which are the teachings of Catholicism. Naturally, it is culturally accepted that churches are a symbol of love and

I conceive power as something magnificent. However, along with the great joys of obtaining power, there comes a great chance for evil. It’s as if there is a menacing wolf lurking behind the powerful person, just waiting to corrupt them. To obtain power one most either do something important, or be someone important. Many times power is acquired by just being born into a certain family.

The darker Machiavelli's views are echoed in Fredrich Nietzsche's philosophy. In his "Morals as Fossilized Violence", Nietzsche charged that humans at

Machiavelli in the beginning of this chapter about how it is better to be cruel to unify its kingdom than to be merciful and king and bring it to ashes, but there still needs to be shown at least a bit of humanity for the others to respect. It is better to be feared than to be loved for the one whom may feel love towards one person may turn against them later on love can get you ruined while fear may keep you in power.although they must be feared but not hated,one must have the correct virtues to remain in power for his subjects to obey him, Machiavelli concludes that love or fear should be established under his control but by all means avoid to be hated.

When reading Nietzsche, The Will to Power, he talks about both a “Metaphysical” and “Organic”. The metaphysical that everything from a rock to a person is “the will to power” same as animism, everything has power. I tend to like his theories on organic. Organic is the will to power is specifically related to all life, and only living life. He states on 37 (Spring-Fall 1887) that, “The repudiated world versus an artificially built "true, valuable” one (Nietzsche)”. Stating man has power, man has purpose, and man has ideas. Ideas like what makes a king powerful, is it his ideas or his army? He talks about, “Detached and idealistic, values, instead of dominating and guiding action, turn against action and condemn it.” Which Foucault talks about

Lastly, Machiavelli is another philosopher that writes in depth about how a ruler should conduct himself, as well as the qualities that make up a ruler. Looking at the teachings of the other philosophers I have previously mentioned, Machiavelli looks at the political authority quite opposite than the two. When it comes to the nature of the ruler or political authority, Machiavelli believes that, “it is much safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking...but when despised he is considered changeable, frivolous, effeminate, cowardly, and irresolute” (Prince 287). These are strong words from Machiavelli that do speak some truth. In his mind, a good ruler would rather be feared than to be loved. By doing so, the people would respect and obey their rulers much easier.