preview

Comparing Matrix And Plato's The Allegory Of The Cave

Decent Essays
Open Document

The thought that humans cannot prove the validity of their own reality has intrigued the minds of philosophers for hundreds of years. Many have tried to understand and explain how we can truly know what is real. The Matrix, Descartes’s Meditations of the Things of Which We May Doubt, and Plato’s The Allegory of the Cave, are all works that address this issue. They have many similarities that tie them together, and yet they all approach the issue of reality from a different angle. When reading and comparing these works, one may ask the question, “Can we prove that what we are experiencing is really true?” Though this is a very deep question and many have spent a lifetime trying to answer and understand it, this paper will attempt to address it in a very limited way. In short, no one can prove that he or she is not living in some kind of matrix, but unless someone brings forth evidence that the experiences humans have on this earth are not …show more content…

Plato’s (or Socrates’) story was not meant to be a plausible reality but only an allegory (hence the name). So, while the story itself isn’t nearly as realistic as the other two, the message is still very relevant; the idea behind it is the same. The false reality is not a world like ours, but one of a cave wall and shadows. Living a false existence is the main theme throughout each of these works, and each one explains it from a different angle and perspective. But the similarities do not end there. As Socrates continues the story, like with the first two works, he makes the point that the men in the cave, even after being exposed to the truth, still believed in the false reality at first. The only difference here is that Socrates speaks of rational belief about believing in realities rather than a desire to live where one is comfortable even if it means living a

Get Access