preview

Comparing Maus I And Maus II

Better Essays

Maus I and Maus II: Intricate Frames of Identity and Experience
Maus is self-referential a number of times throughout each volume, with a variety of purposes. The narrative moves through several interpretive frameworks—Vladek’s perspective, and Artie’s perspective, both of his father and of his father’s story and how he’s choosing to tell it. Throughout these various levels of interpretation, questions are posed in innumerable ways. Vladek’s behavior when he talks about (or even uses) his experiences, Artie’s perspective of his father, and the symbolic representation of the animals, are all expressions of identity that come through as the result of the individual’s frame of interpretation. The text and its subjects are self-aware in a variety …show more content…

In the first volume, Artie ruminates on the subject of Jewish stereotypes and the ways in which his father fits into them. In one panel, he says, “In some ways he’s just like the racist caricature of the miserly old Jew” (Maus I, Spiegelman 131). It’s important to Artie to portray his father accurately, but he’s understandably concerned about playing into stereotypes. Just like the animal and nationality stereotypes, the stereotypes that Vladek fits into work in two ways. Vladek is the ‘miserly old Jew’ but the text shows over and over again that this same pragmatic tendency helped him survive a lot of times in the war, and so in some ways validates the practice. It’s important to note though, that the tendency to save negatively affected Mala and Artie; they both carried a lot of resentment towards Vladek in the ways that he denied them a lot of basic necessities, and in a lot of ways prioritized material items and money over members of his family. So while the text shows an explanation of sorts for Vladek’s behavior, it doesn’t necessarily make excuses for the problems he caused with his actions later on. The engagement between cultural perceptions and lived experience continues the subversive action that is the basic underlying function of the texts. (Maus II,

Get Access