Comparing Modern Leadership And Leadership

This assignment provides an opportunity for me to analyze relevant leadership concerns for an increasingly global future and commit to an emerging leadership theory that is appropriate to guide enactment of my leadership agenda.

Leadership is, and always has been, a vital aspect of social and economic constructs. It is essential to the survival of societies, industries, organizations, and virtually any group of individuals that come together for a common purpose. However, leadership is difficult to define in a single, definitive sense. As such, theories of leadership, what constitutes a great leader, and how leaders are made have evolved constantly throughout history, and still continue to change today in hopes of improving upon our understanding of leadership, its importance, and how it can be most effective in modern organizational cultures.

In this paper, we will review four leadership models: charismatic, servant, situational, and transformational. A separate discussion describing

To ensure leadership effective, several leadership theories are put forward and are adopted by different organizations. Some widely accepted theories include Trait Approach, Style Approach, Situational Approach, New Leadership Approach and Post-charismatic & Post-transformational (Western, 2013). Beyond doubt, they have their pros and cons, and they could play their role to guarantee the effectiveness of leadership as long as they are applied in an appropriate condition.

Approaches to leadership have evolved over time, and in the complex and global world of the 21st century, the need for effective leaders is more prominent in today’s society than ever before. The new styles of leadership involve the shift from the trait approach model to leadership that focused more on the characteristics or qualities of a strong leader and the relational approach model that highlighted the relational process between leaders and followers to servant leadership that emphasizes on serving the subordinates one leads (Northouse, 2015).

The intent of this qualitative research is to determine if the theory of transformational leadership came become a robust and established format from which to foster the authentic needs of followers throughout organizational systems and its culture, by using a team based approach utilizing the followers input and creativity to optimize their work ethic, qualitative and quantitative product productivity.

The contents and assignment in this course has helped me understand the various theories of leadership and how different leadership styles can have a negative or positive effect on followers and organizations. The leadership theories helped me understand the concept of leadership better because it educates me on the different leadership options that are available. Leadership and followership is not based on specific characteristics. Leaders must draw from things and approaches to find the right style. A follower’s attitude determines the way a leader leads. According to Johnson (2011) “Being a good follower means ensuring your boss is supported, but only if he is making optimum decisions”.

There are a multitude of different leaderships theories and some of the current leadership theories model older version in history. To go over them all could sound a little redundant as many have similar concepts. I would like to discuss three contemporary leadership theories that have been most influential in my experience and what I would like to strive to become better at. The three theories are Servant, Authentic and Situational leadership. Not just one of these theories works best

I will focus on the equality; everybody has to have his chance to provide himself.

Through time the concept and interpretation of leadership has gone through many changes as will be seen in this paper. These changes have been ever-improving on the last one but also changing in the requirements of the leader and of the situation of the day. The problem today is that companies are finding it difficult to look for a single source of advice when it comes to the guidance and education for their middle managers in order to try and pinpoint the potential top leader amongst them. This is the nature of leadership however, but through research and a collection of aspects one can start to narrow that search so as to find the qualities that are needed in leadership in our modern society. They may be varied and numerous but they are nonetheless collectible into one all-encompassing leadership model.

This literature review is based on 21st Century Leadership. This review will provide a comparative discussion of the various leadership developments, theories and models, identifying similarities and differences based on a set of criteria selected. This paper begins with an introduction to viewing the ‘map’ of leadership, its theory and frameworks through the different contextual lenses of academic, practitioner and learner. It affirms the complementary importance of theory and practice and the ability of everyone to be a learner in terms of leadership development. The paper then provides a short review of generic leadership literature, highlighting the more significant trends, similarities and differences in 21st century leadership vs

Moreover, leadership is a skill that transfers over time with study, practice and research. Over the years, a great deal of and research has been dedicated to the study of various styles of leadership. Even with extensive data on the subject, many still disagree on what styles or combination of styles to use or link together in order to be effective when leading an organization. Another study( Dierendonck, Stam, Boersma, De Windt, & Alkema 2014) specifically focusing on comparing servant leadership and transformational leadership is another way to explore and link the differential mechanisms to followers expected outcomes while applying pathway leadership and transformational leadership styles to be effective leaders. The application of these styles are essential if the leader’s desire is to ensure that their followers achieve measurable goals. So, the first measure used to evaluate leader’s behavior was included in many response items that analyzed the relationship between transformational leadership and leader outcomes. Bass (1988) notated a bias between the ratings of subordinates and leaders behavior. Nevertheless, all the methods and approaches yielded valid results as noted by each study, but there was only a small amount of evidence that supported the theory that followers of transformational leaders are more committed to their organizations and followers are content with their

Foundational theories are the backbone of today’s application of leadership in all aspects of business in a global society. Understanding the characteristics that define successful leadership is not feasible due to application of leadership principles in diverse circumstances. This does not defray the premise that effective leadership cannot be learned. In fact, learning and understanding the many approaches to leadership allows an individual to internalize and effectively develop a leader’s mentality (Derecskei, 2016). In this section the four core theories on leadership and the tools used under each will be discussed.

Leadership is being able to get people on the same page and work towards a common goal. Our text talked about a few theories such as the “great man” and trait theory, behavioral approaches, and situational and contingency approaches. In this paper I will apply one of the leadership theories from the course text to an organization and explain how the theory works with an example, describe how power and the influence of leaders effect followers in the organization, assess the role and efficiency of transformational and transactional leadership in the organization, assess the traits and characteristics of an effective team leader within the organization, explain how the leadership supports vision, mission, and strategy in the organization,

Research on management and leadership in organizations over the past century shows there are still no clear definitions or answers about what counts as effective and successful leadership; the field remains varied and argued. Actual studies of leadership began in the early twentieth century. The research and studies on leadership have resulted in defining what characters, traits and attitudes are considered to be significant for leaders to possess. The early studies of leadership theories focused on the person and their behaviors, currently known as leadership trait theories and behavioral theories. It is important for organizational leaders and managers to understand what characteristics, traits and actions of an individual mark a great leader when forming a strong diverse workforce.