Comparing Nicolo Machiavelli 's The Prince

1014 Words5 Pages
While the human race is incredibly diverse and expansive, many writers and philosophers work to find common characteristics that they can attribute to what is typically referred to as human nature. Nicolo Machiavelli provides his beliefs on human nature in his text, The Prince. While this work mostly surrounds the proper way to lead a princedom, there are many parts of the text that show how human nature affects the way a prince should rule his people. The examples of princes having to work around humanity provided over the course of Machiavelli’s work ultimately reflect what he considers to be flaws within human beings everywhere. An extensive examination of the devices and techniques used within Nicolo Machiavelli’s The Prince shows how he believes human beings are self-interested beings that can only be ruled through deception and force. The continuation of life and avoidance of death are two of the most essential goals for any and all living species. Machiavelli is correct in pointing out that, despite their complexity, human beings are still subject to these laws. Even a figure as authoritative as the prince still has to consider his mortality and find ways to preserve his life. Machiavelli examines the ways a prince can defend himself when he says, “men are either to be treated kindly, or utterly crushed, since they can revenge lighter injuries, but not graver,” (Machiavelli 4). The diction used in this passage illustrates a sharp contrast in the ways a prince can

    More about Comparing Nicolo Machiavelli 's The Prince

      Get Access