Comparing Quantitative Research Studies PP Essay

2498 Words10 Pages
Comparing Quantitative Research Studies Paula Knight, RN NUR 4165 Introduction  The purpose of this paper is to critique, contrast, and compare two research studies. “Assessment of Anxiety in Intensive Care Patients by Using the Faces Anxiety Scale” written by McKinley, Stein-Parbury, Chehelnabi, & Lovas will be referred to as study one (2004). “Prevalence of Limited Health Literacy and Compensatory Strategies Used by Hospitalized Patients” written by Morris, Grant, Repp, MacLean, & Littenburg will be referred to as study two (2011). Selection of Research Interest Area Choice of Articles  Study one was selected on the basis of its objective › To assess the validity of the Faces Anxiety Scale › To accurately assess presence and…show more content…
 Study two › Literature review followed the introduction › Introduced results from eleven studies that informed readers of current trends in health literacy rates. › Not critically analyzed, merely reported without critique › Brings the reliability and validity of this study into question (“Quantitative Research Critique,” n.d.). Research Problem Statements/Hypotheses  Study one › Variables and how they were studied previously was clearly explained › Dependent variable (state anxiety) was the presumed cause › Independent variable (Faces Anxiety Scale) was the presumed effect (Trochin, 2006). › Though unclear, I believe the hypothesis to be that the Faces Anxiety Scale is a better, more accurate predictor of the presence and severity of anxiety than previous methods. This will lead to more appropriate interventions being implemented and thereby reducing anxiety and promoting favorable outcomes.  Study Two › Dependent variable - level of health literacy › Independent variables - poor health outcomes and high hospitalization rates › Though not explicit, the hypothesis appears to me to be that the prevalence of limited health literacy in hospitalized patients is high and many patients rely on others to aid in their understanding of health information (Morris, Grant, Repp, MacLean, & Littenburg, 2011). › Low health literacy levels have a direct impact on poor health outcomes such as higher rates of hospitalization and
Open Document