preview

Comparing Seager's The Mission And Historical Missions

Decent Essays

James Seager's article The Mission and Historical Missions: Film and the Writing of History and Jesuit Ruiz de Montoya's The Spiritual Conquest journal entries allows us as historians to gain insight of the actuality of event that occurred in Guarani’s community with the Spanish and Portuguese occupiers; which the the movie The Mission loosely portrays. Seager’s work makes consistent point on how the movie misrepresent the Guarani people, by taking action to point-out actual historical events versus that fictitious events in the movie. Montoya’s entries demonstrates some historically accurate, but it is not a credible source itself; as it is shrouded in the Jesuits own bias. The purpose of this journal entry is to elaborate on how these two …show more content…

A clear point against the movies portrayal of spirituality is made early on in his article, “Film Jesuits imagine that Guaranis who joined missions immediately accepted Christianity, a historically inaccurate supposition. Most Guaranis rejected Christianity for decades, often generations.” (Seager, 400). The quote suggest that the movie places the Jesuits in a Eurocentric manner, that the ideals of Europeans would be so easily accepted and the logical discussion to these people. The movie assumed that these people either had no religious views or Christianity was just so impressive and persuasive to them they immediately converted. Not only does the rejection of the religion, as historically mention by Seager, occurred it also implies and later expands that the Guaranis had their own religion. They were more able to think for themselves in history; rather than, the native drones that are presented in the movie. The Guaranis had their own culture and the movie misrepresent this fact, creating this idea of Eurocentrism. The “spiritual conquest” was present but it was not as strong as the movie protrays it in the Guarani society. Whether the movie purposely chooses to misrepresent the native peoples as plain and uncluttered is unclear, however it is found easily in Montoya's …show more content…

After, the Jesuits “enlightening” the Guaranis that the dead corpse that the people worshiped are false beliefs, the following is said, “This was carried out in my presence, so that not a single bone could be carried off and the lie thereby perpetuated.” (Montaya, 89). Monataya account off the whole event seems suspicious. Yes, he does acknowledge that this people did in fact have a sense of their own spirituality, more than the movie demonstrates, but the radicalization to Christianity and the destruction of their own culture seems a little too fast for the Guarani - liked mention with Seager’s article earlier talking about a often strong Guarani resistance to Christianity. It seems all rather convenient for the priests, they heroically fought the devil prior to this and then they burn a few more corpse and suddenly the all the people of the village are on the side of Christ. I believe this and other accounts by Montaya are to play on this idea of Eurocentrism that was previously elaborated on. Montaya accounts hold historically credibility but it is important to keep in mind the bias he may hold when he is accounting his order’s conquest. The idea of a “spiritual conquest” is strong in his account in his account, but is an

Get Access