Comparing Socrates and Aristotle

2586 Words10 Pages
Socrates and Aristotle Socrates and Forms In his literature Socrates has a meaning behind forms. They are also called Platonic Forms, and these are abstracts that are the entities that have been existing self-sufficiently of the sensible world. Actually, they are the ordinary objects that are thought to be imperfect and changeable; nonetheless they faintly copy the perfect and unchallengeable Forms. Therefore, all of the information that have been acquire about the sensible objects (like recognizing what the high and low temperatures were on the day before) is temporary, unimportant, and untrustworthy, while genuine familiarity of the Forms themselves (like knowing that 93 - 67 = 26) perfectly definite persistently. With that said, Plato's theory of Forms or what some might even call the theory of Ideas proclaims that non-material immaterial (but considerable) ideas or forms, and not the material world of that is known to change over time. This change by Plato is considered to be known to us through feeling, this sensation is through of realism. It is clear that Plato is expressing these types of feelings through his characters. For instances, Plato clearly does this with Socrates. He does this so that readers will get a better understanding of the character; therefore even apart from the precise contentious position of the theory, Plato's own opinions are believed to be in doubt. Plato spoke of Methods in expressing a likely answer to how he felt. Explain Socrates's
Open Document