Stephen King once said, “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They are both fruit, but taste completely different.” The superiority of a film adaptation compared to its original novel is a highly contested topic. Although it is stereotypical to say that a book is always better than its movie; that is not always the case. The 1992 MGM film adaptation directed by Gary Sinise of the 1937 novel Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, is among the few adaptations that can compete against the book. Both the novel and the adaptation tell the lives of Lennie and George’s lives on a ranch during the Great Depression, and their efforts in trying to achieve the American dream of owning their own farm. The adaptation has certain key elements that …show more content…
For example, in the beginning of the film, a scene is added where a girl in a red dress runs across a field, screaming for help, followed by a scene with George and Lennie hiding from ranch workers (Sinise). Beginning the film with this scene, in a way, is a reference for the results later in the film. Whereas the novel’s representation of this is only through dialogue between George and Slim, the film presents the audience with an actual scene, acting as both a reference and a way to get the attention of the audience. By including additional scenes like this, the adaptation makes itself more intriguing, which enhances the audience’s experience. Another example of how the film enhances the experience is with on Lennie’s first day at the ranch. When George and Lennie are at the field working, Lennie is tasked with loading the wagons with bags of wheat. Lennie’s strength enables him to carry the bags faster and more efficiently, making the men in the wagon unable to keep up with him. It takes two ranch workers struggling to lift a wheat bag, where Lennie can easily carry one (Sinise). Seeing the two men struggling, and their facial expressions, lightens the mood, as some find it humorous. With this additional scene, Lennie’s strength is once again further implied, but it also adds a bit of humor into the story, in contrast to its otherwise dark mood. The film better enhances a viewer’s experience by including additional scenes, which conveys the story better, due to the audience having a deeper sense of
Americans often try to seek happiness through their success. In Steinbeck’s book Of Mice and Men, and Fitzgerald’s book The Great Gatsby both stories express the characters admiration of achieving the American dream. Both stories explain with example how setting, relationships, and Cause and effect all play a role in the destiny of each character’s American dream.
Barack Obama and George Miller from Of Mice and Men exemplify the aspect of Hope and plans for the future within the american dream.
The book and the movie Of Mice and Men were similar in many ways. While watching the movie, I would remember many things said that came right out of the book. For example, Lennie went straight to the water and drank right out of it. Another thing that was the same was when Lennie and George were sitting by the fire, George told Lennie that they were going to have beans for supper. Lennie kept saying that he liked his beans with ketchup, but they didn’t have any. I also remember when Carlson was begging Curley to let him shoot his dog. Finally Curley gave in, but he wasn’t very happy about it. The last similarity I’m going to talk about is the time Lennie broke Curley’s hand. I think that this was a very important part in the story because
The movie Of Mice and Men and the novel Of Mice and Men are very different from each other. Starting off with the incident in weed. In the book, the incident doesn’t happen. It just tells us that Lennie and George are already away from weeds. In the movie, it shows the girl in a ripped red dress running and getting help because Lennie “raped” her and it shows dogs and men on horses chasing Lennie and George.
I believe that George should have killed Lennie rather than, the ranch hands. I think this because that Ranch hands would have hurt Lennie but they were still going to kill him. George killed Lennie quick and painlessly, if it were the ranch hands Lennie would have suffered, with George he did not even know he was going to die. Know George could have just let Lennie run and hope that no one finds him, but George even said himself “ Lennie you can’t do anything without me”, or something like that. If George would have let Lennie run it is very likely that he would either, die from starvation, or get in trouble and just keep getting in trouble, or he kills another person again on accident and gets killed from that. Either way Lennie is screwed
In 1920 women got the right to vote. In 1948 President Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act. Jeannette Rankin was the first woman to be elected to congress. Women’s rights have come a long way, nowadays women are CEO’sCeo’s of companies and doing great things. Although it wasn’t always like this, in Of Mice and Men, and in Sojourner Truth’s Ain’t I a Woman speech women weren’t treated right. Men thought that women weren’t as strong as them, and couldn’t do a man’s job.
Lennie is the complete opposite character than George. George is a very small character while Lennie is very large. Lennie is big but he is not very smart, he has the mind of a small child. Lennie is mentally disabled so he has to rely on George for most of everything. George is like a parent to Lennie.
The rabbit was telling the truth he should of just listen to him. but George was trying to put him to rest because he was struggling in life.If he would not killed him they would killed him and Lennie. The rabbit was telling him the true. But if Lennie was still alive the cops would been looking for them because they are not supposed to be there. Lennie trust George because in the past they been together that the only friend that Lennie had. George has always told Lennie if he was in trouble to hide be hind a bush.Also in chapter 1 there was a snake trying to kill a rabbit but now on chapter 6 the rabbit was trying to kill the snake because he wanted to get revenge. When George tells Lenni “Gonna do it soon ...Ever’body gonna be nice to you.
Although the film does offer extraordinary imagery and characterization, some still argue that the book is a better representation of the story through its use of mood. Supporters state that Steinbeck’s masterful establishing of mood through his artful diction shows the novel to be superior to the film. They point to the many clever wording and phrasing choices throughout the story, that vividly build the lonely and oppressive atmosphere. These uses of diction, though subtle, manages to powerfully tug at the reader’s heartstrings, immersing them within the story’s somber mood. An example of such great technique can be found in his simple description of Candy while he is in Crooks’ room,“Candy leaned against the wall beside the broken collar
Although it would seem George betrayed Lennie’s trust, George was justified in his decision to shoot Lennie because of Lennie’s actions and safety.
When Lennie talks about how George has never hurt him, he was proven wrong later in the story.They were both having a conversation of how they wanna live on the "fatta the lan".When George heard the voices getting closer he got the gun and shot Lennie in the back of the head.He shot him in that spot so he wouldn't have to suffer.I think George did the right thing by killing Lennie.He had killed Curley's wife and he had killed a puppy.And George only did it because he didn't want him to suffer or get punished.They would have put him to jail or even taken him to an insane asylum.George did it for his own good.Lennie was pretty upset though but he knew he did the right thing.When Lennie and the imaginary rabbit were having the argument,the rabbit
In life you make many sacrifices, for loved ones, friends and the community… Sometimes there are sacrifices that might hurt a lot, but they are made to protect others. George’s choice to shoot Lennie after he had unintentionally killed Curley's wife, had its own personal reason.
Modern-day people pride themselves for living in a society where “all men are created equal”, but this concept does not come without burdensome string attached. Thomas Scarseth explores an intriguing notion from John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men that equality is only attainable because everyone is bound together by the shared experiences of tragedy despite all the other characteristics that divide them. But tragic unity, which is the varied degrees of tragedy that exist in everybody’s life, is caused by these characteristics that separate people. Therefore, equality is indirectly rendered possible because of the contrasting traits of humankind as shown through the various characters in Steinbeck’s acclaimed novel.
The common emotion the two dogs caused the narrator is embarrassment because in the first paragraph the narrator quotes that “Scotch terrier named Jeannie was giving birth to six puppies in the clothes closet of a fourth floor apartment in New York had the expected seventh at the corner of Eleventh Street and Fifth Avenue during a walk she insisted the narrator take her.” This made the narrator embarrassed because she had the puppies on a walk in public. Then the French poodle was an embarrassing moment for the narrator when it was raining and the poodle had a red rubber bib tucked around her throat and he had to hold “a small green umbrella, really a parasol” and to top that, he walked into a garage with a man who saw the narrator carrying
Distinctions between the novel and the film altered the ways that scenes and characters were portrayed. This also changes the theme and the plot of the story which was showed clearly in the novel and made the story flow well together. Eminent characters and scenes were taken out of the film were transmuted in many ways. Despite the differences in the novel and film version, the themes of being prejudiced and exhibiting inequality were expressed greatly throughout the story. While many people know that there have to be cuts while turning a novel into a film, these three elements were imperative to the story and would have improved the film if they were