Comparing Synoptic Gospels And The Gospel Of John

Should one fully read the opening four Gospels of the New Testament, he or she can find many similar patterns of literature and themes affording much attention to detail and study. This is what someone such as Merriam Webster would define as the ?Synoptic Gospels?. So, what are and how can we explain the differences and similarities among synoptic authors Matthew, Mark, Luke, and the gospel, John? Which Book was written first? To what extent did the Evangelists depend on oral tradition, written sources, or each other? The phenomenon and mystery of these similar but unique Synoptic Gospels has for centuries challenged some of the best minds of academia and the church, stirring up much scholarly

Throughout the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, it is apparent that there are similarities as well as differences when it comes to portraying the life and times of Jesus the Christ, the general descriptions of who Jesus was, and the sayings and deeds of Jesus during his short stay on this earth. Scripture scholars highlight that each Gospel writer viewed Jesus from a different perspective.

All stories explained in the gospels have similar results and main ideas, like Mark, Matthew and Luke as to the Gospel of John is a little more different. The stories of Mark, Matthew and Luke are known as synoptic because

The gospel of Luke and John are gospels about Jesus and John the Baptist. They have several differences and similarities. The Gospel of Luke describes the conception and birth of John the Baptist and Jesus while the gospel of Luke describes their life after birth. Summaries, variances, and connections of these two gospels are discussed below.

The Synoptic Gospels are composed of the gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke. These three gospels covered many of the same stories; yet, they disagree with each other on various details within certain stories. Also, numerous events that are in Mark, is not in Matthew or Luke and vice versa. Many historians have concluded that Mark was the first of the three gospels written and that Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source to their own gospels. The Synoptic Gospels were first written in Greek, which would suggest to some ambiguity within Mark, Matthew, and Luke due to certain perceptions and translations within the Greek language. One ambiguity that is shown within the Synoptic Gospels dealt with Jesus’s view on marriage and divorce. Using

The two Gospels that I 've decided to compare are Luke and John. Luke is considered a Synoptic Gospel and presents the human side of Jesus. Luke takes us through the longer version of his birth and his childhood and focuses on the humanity of Jesus. There was a debate in this story whether or not Jesus was human and raised many question to potential followers. Many said that Jesus was just a spirit but by reading Luke, there was great detail of his humanity. Luke directed this book directly to Gentiles and focused more on the teachings and miracles that Jesus created rather than the law. Stated in the text, Luke’s Gospel also depicts more clearly the way in which the proclamation of the kingdom of God and the accompanying mighty works of Jesus brought the benefits of salvation to marginalized people. Luke also highlights the concern of Jesus for the materially poor, and the duty of his followers to be free from love of possession and to give generously to those in need. John was considered a different story in the Bible and in the Gospel. It was the last story of the Gospels and does not repeat any of the other stories from Matthew, Mark, or Luke. John had the opportunity to see the gospel and its affect it had and based that off the

The first three gospels are sometimes called the 'synoptic' (same view) gospels. This is because they each cover teaching and miracles by Jesus that are also covered in another account. John, writing later, recounts Jesus' other words and miracles that have a particular spiritual meaning.

The new testament contains four (4) accounts of the story of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection as presented by Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, The 3 accounts are similar, while Johns bible presents Jesus in a unique way. These differences exist because Matthew and Luke got their information from Mark and John got his information from another source, maybe John did not have access to the other gospels or he chose not to use them. No one really knows the source of John’s gospel and we don’t know for sure who wrote the gospels. Scholars refer to the authors as Matthew, Mark, Luke & John, this may not even be their real names. The Gospel were not first hand accounts except for Mark. John did not seem to have known the existence of the other

When comparing the synoptic gospels and their parables and stories, you can see similarities and differences between them. In the story of Jesus calming the storm Matthew, Mark, and Luke all have their own take on the story. In each of these books, it’s clear they each have a few things in common, as well as key differences. The similarities in the versions of the stories are obvious. In each book, it is seen that Jesus and His disciples were on a boat.

The Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) tell us the story of Jesus' life here on earth. These Gospels are basically eyewitness statements that were written by Jesus' disciples. Due to this fact, there are variations in the stories. The Gospels are very similar, but also very different. There are places in the Gospels where the stories are parallel with very few minor differences like when Jesus tells Levi to follow him as found in Matthew 9:9-13, Mark 2:13-17, and Luke 5:27-32.

The difference between the Gospel of John and the Synoptic Gospels are that John approach is more focused on the embodiment of Jesus and how His journey was more of heavenly wisdom and divine nature. (Harris. 2014) John worldview approach gives a different structure of the Gospel which makes it very different from Matthew, Mark, and Luke and expresses the Jesus is the light even while walking the Earth.(Harris.2014) However, along with the structure, the various events that are given in the Synoptic Gospels such as the birth of Jesus, the break down of the Lord's Supper, and also the transfiguration of Christ to name a few are not mentioned or given a different chronology of when certain events transpire. Meanwhile, John gives events such

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the first books of the New Testament within the Bible, The Gospels as they are so called. The words of the Gospels tell of the teachings of Jesus and his disciples and they bring the word of God to others through the land. Now, the books of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called synoptic gospels as they are all very similar as to the way the stories are structured, worded, and similarity in context. As for the book of John, this book differs a bit with its structure being different than the 3 before and also its perception, or depiction, of Christ.

The Synoptic Gospels paint a picture of the life, ministry and death of the Savior Jesus Christ. Each book has several of the same accounts recorded, they differ in small ways but the summary is the same. Then we come across details, important vivid details, in one book such as Matthew that aren’t found in Luke. Matthew and Luke both spend a significant amount of time with Jesus and their accounts of this are invaluable. It’s important to our faith and the History of Jesus to compare these books and use them together to see the entire picture of the Jesus Christ.

The Gospel of John differs in many key areas to the Synoptics,and I will address some differing lines of thought.

Additionally, John indicates most of Jesus works in Galilee and Jerusalem while synoptic gospels place it in Galilee and Judea. Jesus’ teachings in the four gospels were mainly in parables and there is account of Jesus speaking with any figure. In contrast gospel of John accounts that Jesus used philosophical speeches in his teachings and interacted with figures like Nicodemus. Another event that distance gospel of