Comparing The Bandar-Log And The Jungle Book

The Jungle by Upton Sinclair was written to expose the brutality faced by the workers in the meatpacking industry. Sinclair wanted to show people what was really going on in the factory because few people were informed about these companies work conditions. He wanted to show the public that meat was “ diseased, rotten, and contaminated” (Willie).” This revelation shocked the, public which later led to the creation of the federal laws on food and safety. Sinclair strongly shows the failure of capitalism in the meatpacking industry which he viewed as inhumane, destructive, unjust, brutal, and violent (Willie).”

Rhetorical devices of repetition and similes were most commonly found used separately and together to emphasize what was really important which was the dangers that were brought upon the evil of capitalism. Metaphors and Symbolism are major in Sinclairs’ novel, The Jungle. Animals in the slaughterhouse were most predominantly used as symbolism and this effectively caught the reader's attention by showing them how not only humans were being abused but how much cruelness was shown amongst the innocent

Upton Sinclair was the author of a book called "The Jungle". His book was designed to bring light to the conditions of those who canned meat in Chicago, but his foul descriptions of the unsanitary food, and the vile slaughterhouses resonated with his readers much more.

During the turn of the 19th century, the second industrial revolution was taking place in America, which shifted society from agricultural to industrial. Innovations and new technology were the driving vehicle for burgeoning businesses in the city. With this shift, populations swelled in large cities such as New York, Chicago, and Pittsburg by job seeking immigrants from countries including Ireland, Germany, and Lithuania who were attracted to the United States wanting to be a part of a so called “American dream” and economic opportunity. These immigrants longed for a chance to start over again and wanted nothing more than an opportunity to make a better life for themselves, and the generations

The Jungle Book was a book written by Upton Sinclair in 1905 which discussed the meatpacking industry. It exposed the industry as a dirty industry that was not very well regulated at all and that the meat that they produced was often contaminated and could make individuals who ate it very ill. This caused major outrage throughout America and in 1906 a meat inspection bill was passed by Congress so that the meat industry could be regulated so individuals would not have to eat dirty meat like they did before. This showed the power of the Progressive Era as a major flaw in regulations was shown in 1905 and just a year later there was major legislation passed which was there to regulate the industry to protect the consumers.

In The Jungle, by Upton Sinclair, and The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck, the characters are forced with economic, social, and political problems that they must cope with throughout the story. Both books are similar in that they emphasize that in this country, one simply cannot win unless they play by nature’s rules.

Upton Sinclair the author of The Jungle a self proclaimed socialist. Wanted to show what the meatpacking industry was like from an outside perspective. Novelist have free rein when writing a novel but in this case Sinclair did not have the proper evidence to back up his version of the meat packing industry. The version that Sinclair portrayed in The Jungle was of appalling working conditions. The way he described it was diseased and rotten. The community of these workers were as misrepresented as packers and packinghouse products. He portrays Jurgis as a helpless animal that is wounded, the target for unseen enemies.

New York Times contributor, Goodwell Nzou, in his article, “In Zimbabwe, We Don’t Cry for Lions,” he effectively claims that lions should be seen as a dangerous figure rather than a sympathetic controversy. Nzou supports this claim asserting that lions actually kill people and aren’t lovable creatures like the media presents them. He uses an example to appeal to pathos when stating, “In my village in Zimbabwe, surrounded by wildlife conservation areas, no lion has ever been beloved, or granted an affectionate nickname. They are objects of terror.” The use of this example allows the audience to understand and grasp on what the author’s first hand experience in the situation.

This report is based upon the book The Jungle, written by Upton Sinclair. This book was published by The Jungle Publishing Co. New York in 1906.

In the story Lord of the Flies, there are four main characters including Ralph, Piggy, Simon, and Jack. They are all unique in their own way, and they all think a little bit differently about there situation on the island. On the island everyone decided Ralph as the chief so he is the leader and what he says goes. Ralph and Piggy have a lot of similarities and at the same time they have a lot of thing about them that are different.

Corruption, lies, adultery, politics, and death are all topics addressed in Upton Sinclair’s 1906 novel The Jungle. The book reveals the atrocities that occurred during the early 1900’s in Chicago’s cruel and disgusting meatpacking district. The Jungle chronicles the struggle of a Lithuanian family that came to America with dreams of making their riches and passing it on to their descendants. Analysis of the novel reveals a recurring theme of how desperation makes people do horrible things such as being coerced into sexual acts, working in dangerous conditions, and selling themselves for money. Peer review by Slate’s Karen Olsen critics the novel’s shortcomings and praises its high points. The tale of a poor, hopeful Lithuanian family

Elephants have been victims of not just the incessant poaching but also of the civil wars; ultimately making them to fight back. The killing case have gone over the roof, as the “singular perversity” (Siebert 353) of the attacks. In India, “nearly one thousand people have been killed by elephants between 2000 and 2004” (Siebert 353). Several frequent attacks were recorded in Africa and other villages where the denizens were forced to evacuate their houses. ‘nearly one thousand’ which accentuates the gravity of the situation in 4 years had gained a lot of attention from the elephants researchers. Seibert’s prime third perspective, Gay Bradshaw, Oregon State psychologist, claims that that “everybody pretty much agrees that the relationship between elephants and people has dramatically changed” (Siebert 353). The choice of diction ‘dramatically’ indicates that elephants are not being violent towards human beings but they are also doing it intentionally. Dramatic behavior changes over the years are now being explained in the elephants. “Bradshaw and several colleagues argued that today’s elephant populations are suffering from a form of chronic stress, a kind of species-wide trauma” (Siebert 354), due to “decades of poaching and habitat loss” (Siebert 354). Elephants are becoming more destructive and Bradshaw looked into combining “traditional research into elephant behavior with insights about trauma drawn from

Elephant has long been known as one of man’s best friends, who have peacefully coexisted along with humanity for thousands of years. However, the relationship between the two is no longer in the equilibrium state. In “An Elephant Crackup?”, Charles Siebert discusses the downfall of the elephants. He gives a depiction of the recent raging and violent acts of the elephants among themselves and toward other species, including humans, and presents an educated and almost unexpected explanation to their behaviors. He says elephants are just like us; they have feelings and now are “suffering from a form of chronic stress, a kind of species-wide trauma”(Siebert 354). The similarity that should be something fascinating is now slowly turning them into the immensely savage beasts before wiping them out of existence. Even when the appearance of the words “stress” and “trauma” looks like a serious case of “anthropocentric conjecture”, it provides a totally new vision, a fresh way of looking at the boiling issue of the disappearance and sadistic acts of elephants specifically and wild animals at large. With the help of two powerful essays: “Great to Watch” by Maggie Nelson and “The Power of Context” of Malcolm Gladwell, the issue of the unusual behaviors of the elephants is thoroughly illuminated and its solution no longer seems to be out of human’s reach.

The Bandar-log are compared to bullies because of the way they talk. The Bandar-log talk with lie. In the Jungle Book, Bagheera says to Mowgli, ”They lie. They have always lied.’’ This quote proves that the monkey people talk of nothing but lies. Bullies also talk with lies. Bullies

The Jungle Books is a series of classic stories written by famous author Rudyard Kipling. The stories are separated into two books; The Jungle Book (1894) and The Second Jungle Book (1895) and were first published in magazines in England in 1984-5. One may say the stories can be regarded as classic stories told by an adult to children. They are fables where animals can talk and live in harmony according to ‘The Law of the Jungle’. However, the stories are teaching moral lessons that are inspirational for both adults and children. The stories contains powers that challenge ‘The Law of the Jungle’ and force the jungle animals to fight while ‘Mowgli’, the stories’ protagonist makes a self-discovery that changes him forever. This essay will discuss this self-discovery with the theme of revenge in the ‘Mowgli’ stories in The Jungle Books.