Comparing The Historical And Intellectual Circumstances Surrounding The Writing Of Two

Better Essays
Compare the historical and intellectual circumstances surrounding the writing of two formally contrasting plays, commenting on their impact upon each play’s purpose and reception.
(Choose one realist and one non-realist play from the list of set texts)

A defining act, speech or movement can make history. When someone goes against the norm and convention is thrown aside, defining work is immediately recognised. History is made up of good and bad, the moral and immoral, but all encompass one another. The thought of the age and what people are thinking has an immediate influence on the sculpting of a playwright’s creation. The content and the angle their work takes is largely owed to the feeling of the masses as this equally contributes to its authenticity. Amongst other places throughout history, the theatre is a platform where these defining acts can be found. The way the play is received is another measure of its impact, influence and historical value. Two plays that contrast in their forms but have created impact in their individual time are Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House and Tristan Tzara’s The Gas Heart. The focus of this essay will be to compare the two contrasting plays, in order to recognise, in spite of certain differences, the messages that both playwrights are voicing through the use of their characters and using critical analysis to determine whether each play was successful in its purpose.

Dada was a movement born out of a pool of avant-garde artists, poets,
Get Access