Those who aspire to be good leaders need information and knowledge to guide their employees to greatness. The Influencer: The New Science of Leading Change and The Three Signs of a Miserable Job have a wealth of information for leaders as well as their employees to expand their lives and the way they live it. This paper will compare and contrast the New Science of Leading Change and The Three Signs of a Miserable Job to show the importance of both books. Additionally, it will give the rationale behind using the two books in the same course. Lastly, it will outline how a leader can learn from and use the information in the two books to create a more effective organizational environment.
COMPARING THE TWO LEADERSHIP BOOKS When comparing
…show more content…
The Influencer starts by asking the questions, “Can I do what’s required? and Am I Motivated?” This starting point allows the influencer to assess whether the six-source model will be beneficial to the employees. On the other hand, the Three Signs model aspire leaders to engage their employees; therefore, benefitting the organization to build a culture of job fulfillment. This book asks managers to take a self-assessment, relating to anonymity, irrelevance and immeasurement. The Three Signs of a Miserable Job (2007) boasts the first step to reducing job misery lies in understanding the root causes of a miserable job (p. 220). Comparing the two books shows the benefits to leaders and their employees. Contrasting the two books will display noticeable differences in achieving their goals.
CONTRASTING THE TWO BOOKS In contrast to The Three Signs of a Miserable Job, the Influencer summarizes three mistakes which can be made during the six-source model. These mistakes include: fuzzy, uncompelling goals, infrequent or no measures, and bad measures. These mistakes according to the Influencer (2013) can undermine the influence of the change agents; therefore, allowing no vital behavior change to happen (p. 16). Due to this factor, The Three Sign of a Miserable Job does not give steps to follow when their model
The authors of Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge created a simple infrastructure to identifying the essential processes to becoming a take charge leader. This book can be separated in two parts. Bennis and Nanus use the same strategies of becoming a great leader to transcending one’s self and using the exact strategies to empower and transform an organization. The book begins with enlightening the reader with what charge truly looks like in leadership. In this section of the book the reader will identify a paradigm shift and establish the power of transformative leadership. The authors proceed with ensuring the reader understands the importance of managing one’s self prior to being an effective and empowering leader. In this section of the book the authors provide the following four strategies which are also used to transform an organization: attention
These types of leaders, according to Avolio (1991) possess the characteristics of individual consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence. This paper will examine the outcomes that are a direct result of transformational leaders who exhibit these types of traits such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment, job stress, safety, supervisor satisfaction, team, performance, and general.
“Motivating Employees” is a book about how employee motivation is driven by companies that invest and grow their employees. One of the most important traits of highly effective and successful companies is that employees are happy and have fun at work. Leadership is not assaulting your employees, but to lead your employees you need to motivate by using caring,
Leadership is the elaboration of group inspiration. One person entrusted as leader can implore the aid, and support of supporters in the accomplishment of a common mission. According to Gurdjian, Halbeisen, and Lane “Becoming a more effective leader often requires changing behavior. But although most companies recognize that this also means adjusting underlying mind-sets, too often these organizations are reluctant to address the root causes of why leaders act the way they do” (Gurdjian, Halbeisen, and Lane, 2014) However, today abundant businesses engross importance on the improvement of leaders. Some of the ultimate leaders were formerly followers, such as in instructive businesses. One aspect as leaders many have to contemplate in striving
Leadership is a skill some are born with the other can learn. There are many styles of leadership. This paper will focus on three main styles of leadership including autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. Transformational leadership is a type a leadership that is very difficult to teach and we will explore the great effects of this type of leadership. Wells and Wells (2010) explain several aspects of leadership that leaders should portray, no matter what style they use. These including :articulating a vision, explaining what is expected of himself or herself as leader as well as what is expected of staff members, providing guidance and mentoring, developing staff members by coaching them one on one, understanding the importance of teamwork,
transformational leaders can greatly impact the performance of a workforce by emulating the characteristics of charisma, scholarly attributes that created stimulation, and thoughtfulness for each individual. The products of transformational leaders that lead their organizations in this manner result in improved customer service and a more positive work environment.
Leadership. We all know great leaders when we see them. They are the one who inspire us, they are committed and honest. Winston Churchill, General Patton both exemplify the qualities of a great leader. But how often do we think about the qualities that make a leader substandard. We all know from the leaders who did bad things. Adolph Hitler always comes to mind but was he a bad leader or just a bad man. In this week’s class paper, we read about the pitfalls of a bad leader. In her article” The Value of Valuing Employees Six ways leaders inadvertently curb innovation, motivation” author Christine Comaford explores the six factors that are detrimental to a leader and their leadership abilities. In my following paper, I am taking a look at those six pitfalls and the different strategies an organization can initiate to correct those drawbacks.
In today’s business world, one of the most important contributing factors to the overall success of an organization is the effectiveness of their leadership. Effective leaders carry with them a strong skill set along with a broad knowledge base gained from experience that allows them to effectively and efficiently manage change initiatives. An organization that possessing an effective leadership team is more likely to experience success, especially it comes to creating effective change. The leaders’ role is crucial during a change
The book The Heart of Change shows the practical side of the theories that are taught in the course textbook. It presents stories of successes and failures based in the application of concepts discussed in Organizational Behavior and Management and in class. Although we talked about several different concepts the ones that are evident in the examples in The Heart Of Change are the more progressive and individual centered approaches. The leadership characteristics that are important to successful change in an organization are those that are espoused in the transformational theory of management. It makes sense that ideals in line with the transformational management theory
To begin with, the authors are crystal clear when it comes down to laying out the blueprint the requirements needed for a successful leader. Stepping into any profession requires patience and clear thinking. The authors mention “taking a minute out each day of your leadership can really make a difference between a good and a bad leader”. Throughout the book, the authors step into depth explaining why it is necessary for the leaders to take just one minute out of their day to notice any noteworthy changes in relationship within the firm. By being packaged in the box the entire day and not thinking and stepping out the box, it can cause delays in work and/or possibly an unsuccessful firm. The authors move on to speaking about the different levels of management and the flexibility that occurs at those various levels.
The primary goal of Influencer is to change the company, the workers in that company, and ultimately to change the world humans inhabit. In addition, this book strives to create drastic change to inject positivity into employees and employers. The primary goal of The Three Signs of a Miserable Job is to help individuals increase personal satisfaction in their workplace. The simple reminders in this book helps readers make personal improvements in order to elevate themselves and their work environment. Both books discuss the importance of empowering employees and helping to increase an employee’s overall satisfaction with their job.
To start out, the Influencer introduces the three keys to success. By using the three keys, focus and measure, find vital behaviors, and engage all six sources of influence, will result in lasting changes of the human behavior. In The Three Signs of a Miserable Job, all three keys to success where used and concrete evidence was shown had it worked. Brian Bailey was a perfect example of how a good leader uses the three keys to influence behavior and overcome the frustration of unhealthy work environments, by making them more rewarding and fulfilling.
Every day the things around us begin to change without us taking much observation of what is truly going on, weather it be big or small. The business world is one that is constantly changing and the people associated in this world have to adapt to those changes. Peter Drucker, the “creator” of management, knew change happens everywhere especially in the business world, so the changes were no surprise to him. In the novel, The Definitive Drucker by Elizabeth Haas Edersheim, Drucker’s ideas and thoughts on leadership, collaboration and motivation by fear of failure really impressed me and got my brain thinking truly like a businessman. Leadership is crucial in every aspect of any business and leadership is made up of the ability to make decisions along with the personality of a person. Collaboration plays a large role in well-run organization; within collaboration the correct skills need to be attached to the right person and a high level of communication through out the organization. Motivation by fear of failure has a large impact of employees in a business because no one wants to fail and that helps motivate some people in a business. These three areas of business feed off one another and together they help improve the business world. Looking at these topics it has helped me learn more about the business world and how it works from the inside out. After reviewing my biggest take-aways from Drucker, it made me think about how I learn and work but also how I can improve
In order to move forward and keep ahead, I believe an organization need change leaders who have capabilities to have their workforce go from change avoidance to change acceptance. “One of the most significant strengths of an effective leader is the ability to create a positive work climate where people are energized to do their best work, free of unnecessary distractions” (Cronkite, n.d.). During this part of the change process I feel the change leader would have better success if he would be tactful and harness the skills of others by working in a collaborative rather than hierarchical way. Leadership in an organization involves instilling motivation and enthusiasm in the employees. An effective leader knows how to manage and tackle difficult situations and people. Many reasons can cause a force of change in organizations but I feel it’s up to change leaders to manage these planned and unexpected changes. (Word count: 548)
The impact of leadership style in the change process of an organization influences the performance; Leadership as stated by Martin, Liao and Campbell (2013) remains one of the most consequential contextual influencers of employee performance. Latson (2014) elucidated that some leaders may have the best intentions, but the impact will not be in alignment with the intension. But leadership trait is the ability to inspire, motivate and engage the followers to make the inspired vision happen beyond their normal capabilities (Mendez, Munoz & Munoz 2013). A change is the most frequent phenomenon of today's reality and a good understanding of how to manage the change process is very essential; Change is translation from one state into