Self-knowledge is a highly discussed topic by many prominent philosophers. Two of these philosophers are Thomas Aquinas and Catherine of Siena. The philosopher, Thomas Aquinas, is a very important figure in medieval philosophy. He has discussed various topics, including self-knowledge. In addition, “he was influenced, philosophically, by past philosophers as well as those who became his mentors and contemporaries. Among these the most important was, of course, Aristotle” (MacIntosh, 2017, p. 1). Another philosopher that has extensively examined self-knowledge is Catherine of Siena. She is a “renowned medieval theologian and Doctor of the Catholic Church” (Nemes & Wessling, 2017, p. 303). Although both philosophers have discussed self-knowledge, …show more content…
She believes that self-knowledge must be obtained internally. In Late Medieval Mysticism, she states that “maintaining itself in the sweet retreat of self-knowledge and of God’s goodness, the soul comes humbly to see itself for what it is” (Petry, 1957, p. 265). This shows that Catherine of Siena believes that in order for us to understand and obtain self-knowledge, we must retreat ourselves towards God. In this manner, our soul will try to understand itself, thus allowing us to obtain self-knowledge. Furthermore, Catherine of Siena mentions that “the soul, who is lifted by a very great and yearning desire for the honor of God and the salvation of souls, begins by exercising herself, for a certain space of time, in the ordinary virtues, remaining in the cell of self-knowledge, in order to know better the goodness of God toward her” (Petry, section 1, p. 270). This part of the text may refer to Catherine’s own struggle to obtain self-knowledge. This is because she spent a lot of her life in isolation from the age of 18 to 23, which she did in order to exercise her soul (Hennig, 2018, p. 1). As mentioned before, she believed this would allow her to “[remain] in the cell of self-knowledge” (Petry, section 1, p. 270) and that it would allow her to know the goodness of God. In addition, she states that “if thou wilt arrive at a perfect knowledge and enjoyment of me, the Eternal Truth, that thou shouldest never go outside the knowledge of thyself, … thou wilt know me and thyself” (Petry, section 4, p. 274). This statement demonstrates that if you are able to understand God internally, it will enable you to obtain self-knowledge. In other words, this reiterates Catherine’s view that understanding God internally is the way to understand
The appearances of Augustine and his twin brother, Alfred, are in great contrast, keying us in on some important behavioral differences. Alfred St. Clare has dark eyes, a haughty Roman profile, and is decidedly built very well, with tan skin. He has a much more brutal way of treating his slaves, and this is made even clearer when his son, Henrique—who is also dark-eyed and has a princely, entitled look—beat one of their young slaves. Augustine St. Clare, on the other hand, is full of spirit with the same bright blue eyes as his daughter, Eva, and a more wiry shape. Henrique’s actions are called out by little Eva, with her head full of golden curls and angelic face, who takes very much after her after. While Alfred apparently thinks that allowing
Self-knowledge is an understanding or knowledge of one's own capabilities, feelings, or motivations. In Zora Neale Hurston’s novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God, Janie goes on a quest to discover self-knowledge by undergoing three marriages and facing multiple challenges. Through this quest, Janie is able to learn that one must not live for others, but for herself and for God.
“But where, where was this self, this innermost part, this ultimate part? It was not flesh and bone, it was neither thought nor consciousness, thus the wisest ones taught. So, where, where was it? They knew everything, the Brahmans and their holy books, they knew everything, they had taken care of everything and of more than everything, the creation of the world, the origin of speech, of food, of inhaling, of exhaling, the arrangement of the senses, the acts of the gods, they knew infinitely much—but was it valuable to know all of this, not knowing that one and only thing, the most important thing, the solely important thing?” (Hesse and
To truly think about knowledge brings about some interesting thought. When asked to think about knowledge, most individuals concern themselves solely with what they know such as certain subjects, theories or facts. In the grand scheme of things, this way of thought is seemingly only minute or even superficial. As human beings, we do not always considered how we come to know what we know. We often place are acquisition of knowledge lower in a taxonomy of importance. All too often, individuals take knowledge and its power for granted. However, individuals like René Descartes and his work, The Meditations, provide a deep exploration of knowledge and all its facets. For every individual or scholar this work is very important in that it causes
He inhaled deeply, standing next to the seamstress, gazed up at his sudden fate. One. A wasted life, he had explained, a wasted life that soon would never see the light of day again and sink into the grave, but a trace of significance would be left throughout his bones. Towering over all six carts, fifty-one souls and one faux Evremonde, the sharp female heisted the hundreds of eyes, and pinned down all chance of escaping the fate. Ten. It was at the eleventh-hour, and he could not abandon his sacrifice, but only accept what this wasted life could now achieve. It could save the life of the one man he resembled but desired to be and in parallel, save the life of Her- the only one capable of giving him a purpose. Although gruesome, the sharp
Understanding our self is good because we know what we want to make us happy, what do we enjoy learning about and what makes us unhappy. When we know what makes us happy, we can try to do it more often and stay away from things that would make us unhappy. We get to know our self from having knowledge because we know more things and we would try them and find something we like. In relation to Fahrenheit 451, Clarisse asked Montag whether he was happy, Montag never responded immediately and he starts to think about the question. He then goes home and saw that his wife tried committing suicide. He then realizes that he isn’t really happy and start searching for answers that will make him satisfied/happy. This is another proof that knowledge helps you understand yourself and gaining happiness even though in Montag’s case he had to look for the answers to made him
One method one can know things about themselves is through the senses. One can see and feel that one has two arms, two eyes, a nose, a mouth, etc. One can also hear oneself when talking and smell oneself after a workout. If someone really wanted to, one could even taste themselves. One can also feel pain when one breaks a bone or when one is heartbroken. Similarly one can know love and hate, happiness and sadness, and hope and disbelief. Another method one can know things about themselves is through skill knowledge. For example, one can say that one knows how to play an instrument. One can and should know things about oneself in order to have individualism and prove to oneself that one is
St. Catherine of Siena was an important figure of the church by how she would redirect people to the path of Christ.She was known for her spiritual conviction and wisdom. Everyone trusted her because she was fully devoted to the church. No one ever doubted he love for God.
On the temple at Delphi, a multitude of adages were written. Perhaps the most well-known of these is the command to “know thyself.” Throughout history, many great thinkers have attempted to face the challenge of how one can come to know his or herself. Among these thinkers are scholars such as Aristotle, Plato, Descartes, and countless others. However, this question is not one meant solely for philosophers; in fact, there have been many non-scholars who have taken up this challenge. When confronted with the works of these thinkers, one cannot help but to question his or her own existence and what it really means to exist. To illustrate this introspection, the works of both Rene Descartes and Gian Lorenzo Bernini will be analyzed. Both of these men used religion, out-of-the-box thinking, and the
This fundamental of knowing can be difficult because the knowing of self is interdependent in observations and feedback from other people. This process is dynamic and can be ever changing because as the relationships within the individual environment changes the beliefs and values of the self could change as
Catherine of Siena was born in Italy in 1347 at a time when political and religious changes were affecting the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. Dedicating her life to the Holy Spirit from a very young age, Catherine pursued a life of purity and simplicity that served as a background to her great literary work, The Dialogue of the Divine Providence . Her work focuses on the importance of prayer and its transcendent power in human life.
achieve the maximum point of virtue, self – knowledge has a central role, as it is a prerequisite
5.) Aquinas explains that a person cannot have knowledge of a corporeal thing unless that person has the sense in order to have a sensory experience of it. This experience that is explained by Aquinas is the first of his three grades of cognitive power. He calls his first grade of cognitive power the sense, being the act of a bodily organ in order to understand the individuals and their particulars. The second grade of cognitive power he calls the angelic intellect which exists apart from matter. He explains the angelic intellect as a divine mind in which knows the universal and understands the material things through immaterial things. The final grade of cognitive power is the human intellect and Aquinas explains that
In very earlier research, the theory developed by Wicklund (1975, 1978, 1979) defines self-awareness mostly as one’s ability to self-observe. That person will base on certain standard or new information to judge his own behavior (as cited in
“Why are we so lonely?” Initially, it seems as if this question has no real significance; being asked too many times by people. However, it does bring to light a real dilemma going on in society today. Thanks to modern influences, such as technology, our ability to communicate on an interpersonal level is becoming twisted; how we communicate online human beings are social creatures that desire intimacy. But, more research is slowly being completed as Kory Floyd, Author of the book The Loneliness Cure and professor of Health and Family Communication at the University of Arizona, clarifies the concept of Affection in the Commpendium podcast; highlighting the nuances within relationships.