Comparing Wernher Von Braun's View On Science And Religion

Within philosophy, there has long been a question about the relationship between science and religion. These two systems of human experience have undoubtedly had a lot of influence in the course of mankind’s development. The philosopher Ian Barbour created a taxonomy regarding science and religion that has become widely influential. His taxonomy postulates that there are four ways in which science and religion are thought to interact. The four categories are: conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. By using articles from a select few philosophers, theologians, and scientists, it is clear to see the ways in which these two systems of human experience are categorized in the four categories presented by Ian barbour. However, it will be apparent that the category of conflict may be seen as the most dominant in regard to the interaction between science and religion.

Technology has become apart of the human way of life. Simply step outside and technology can be seen everywhere. It aids not only our nation, but the world as a whole. Yet there was a point an time in history where technology didn't exists; it was just a mere thought. Such an idea was once thought to be inhuman or idiotic. It was portrayed as witch craft, unnatural, and frond upon because people were unwilling to change and accept new ideas. Yet when beliefs are tested, broken down, and explained, then greatness comes about it. There are people who brave enough to test these theories, without them we wouldn't be where we are today. Technology has been one small step for man, but one giant leap for mankind.

As religion began to advance with technology people began to question if there was any god or higher power. This advancement to technology began more and more people began to question religion. Science showed us that we had evolved from monkeys instead of a god creating us, science has also found that the world was created over time naturally instead of god making it. Science has converted many people into atheists, therefore causing more debates about religion and how it happened.

“Technology... is a queer thing. It brings you great gifts with one hand, and it stabs you in the back with the other.”- Carrie Snow. Just as Carrie Snow mentions, science and technology are glorious things that can help and benefit nearly everyone! But anything can turn bad… in one case, scientific knowledge created the atomic energy which was created in a chance to strive forward, but instead left us farther behind than we should.

John William Draper, in the History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science, states, “The history of Science is not a mere record of isolated discoveries; it is a narrative of the conflict of two contending powers, the expansive force of the human intellect on one side, and the compression arising from traditionary faith and human interests on the other.” John William Draper brings up a strong truth behind the progression of science. Human faith inevitably conflicts with the progression of science. One may think that religion is the moral part of human belief and science is the advancement of intellect. It is inevitable that morals and the advancement of intellect would. Emotions and morals sometimes may overpower what the advancement of science would lead to. This concept is present in the ethical controversy involved with the Catholic Church and stem cell research. The moral and heart of many members of the Catholic Church easily disables the acceptance and support of stem cell research. This is unfortunate because stem cell usage and research has tremendous potential in helping those that suffer from disease. Stem cell research will advance medical fields and assist in finding cures for deadly ailments. Many followers of the Catholic Church view the science of stem cell research as killing innocent lives, however a sense of the faithful needs to come into action in order to look passed tradition and history to

Is there a conflict between religion and science, or are both items compatible? This question is addressed in the debate that is written about in the book Science and Religion, Are they Compatible, by Daniel C. Dennett and Alvin Plantinga. Alvin Plantinga thoroughly debates the topic by covering the compatibility of Christianity and science. He continues his argument by stating the issue of naturalist and science harbor the conflict not the theism. Plantinga goes into detail how some scientific theories without the help of theism has conflict and should be considered falsifiable because of the contradictions they possess. While Alvin Plantinga does make a prominent effort to illustrate how religion and science are compatible, there are also

We now see that technology can, to a certain extent, be complementary to religion (contrary to

Science made abortions available which is made a conflict and made people do it. The big bang which some turn people away from God. Genetic engineering which made people change instead of staying the same. Human cloning which gave man not born but made. There’s always a constant war between science and religion and that someday science could eventually ruin religion. In the book science has taken over society. A Christian might say that science is always against religion and is true that it is happening slowly.

There is nothing more profound about the topic of science and technology than its ability to be a partner in helping to save lives. It is so influencial in coming up with the latest drugs to combat harmful and even deadly diseases and viruses such as AIDS, and some cancers. We are where we are today because of the remarkable innovations in science and technology. The idea that lives can be saved from such innovations as a new flu vaccine, or a new type of antibiotic that can battle chicken pox, and many other diseases. Its all about the advancements that we get from science and technology that let us live the way we do. Now, we dont have to worry about dying from the chicken pox or

He was a rocket engineer, NASA, chief architect of the Saturn V rocket of the Apollo manned lunar missions also engineering program manager. “Research is what I’m doing when I don’t know what I’m doing.”

Dr. Wernher von Braun was born on March 23, 1912 in Wyrzysk, Poland. He died on June 16, 1977 in Alexandria VA. One of his greatest achievements was creating the V-2 rocket. The rocket was 46 feet long and weighed 27,000 pounds. Its top speed was 3,600 miles per hour 20,000 slave labourers died from building the V-2.In 1937 von Braun was sent to peenemunde on the baltic coast.

Religion has been around for as long as human have been alive. Religion has played a big role in peoples, cultures, the way some people live, people’s decisions and the way they act and our society. Religions has played a role in our civilization for the good and there are some for the bad or as others may refer as controversial. Technology is something people have had for quite some time now and we have used it to communicate and spread information and our ideas. Technology has played a role in religion for the good and for the bad.

What is the relationship between religion and science? In his book, Consilience, Edward O. Wilson aims to find a unified theory of knowledge. Consilence also seeks to show how science is superior to and can replace religion. In this paper, I intend to show how Wilson understands this relationship and science as well as how. as well as show John Stuart Mill would agree or disagree with Wilson.

Science is a double edged weapon, it might be used for the prosperity of human beings and also it can be used as a weapon to kill human beings. Therefore, we cannot consider technology to be ethical or unethical, but we can consider our usages to be ethical or unethical. Alfred Nobel has established Nobel Prize to encourage scientists when he found that his invention “Dynamite” was used in wars to kill human beings. Science and technology are harmless; however we might misuse them and make them a tool for harming each other.

Science and technology offer a great deal to us, and it would be difficult to imagine any life, which would not be connected to science and technology in any way. Even the cars we drive are direct outcomes of science and technology. We depend on many things to go about our daily lives, and if it weren't for science and technology, we would be lost. Sometimes if you look at people around you who are not as interested or knowledgeable about technology, you can't help to wonder how they do the many things I use technology for. While living in a third world country for 3 months last