Comparing and Contrasting the Speeches of Romney and Obama

Unquestionably, President Barack Obama and President Donald Trump effectively spoke upon their difficult occasion, in separate ideas, which are based on emotional connections, public demands, and uses of rhetorical appeals. One way their speeches was effective was due to their tone, which had built strong connections with their audiences. Obama’s tone was reassuring and heartening, while Trump’s tone was devastating and supportive. In the same manner, the president's offer support, prayers, and unity to the public. In addition to tone and public needs, Obama and Trump use similar devices to further make their speeches effective. A few examples, include parallelism and anaphora. However, Obama and Trump have certain contrasting statements,

In the two speeches Obama and Trump, both of them dressed well but Obama had a better body language and Trump had a lack of body language. Even though both are presidents they are different, Trump had lack of sentences while Obama new what had to say. When they were talking Trump was serious and nervous, meanwhile Obama was enjoyable and also friendly even

During Al Gore’s concession to President Bush in 2000, he stayed positive and took the high road because of his recent loss in the presidential election. Through the use of specific diction, repetition, sincere facial expressions, and lack of hand movements he was able to not only ensure his supporters that they were in great hands, but he also saved his reputation after a defeat in the election. Gore’s primary objective was to apologize for the chaotic election and give a last minute impression to win over or neutralize many Americans opinions of himself. These tactics along with his neutral and informative tone would be remembered in making his speech extremely successful.

On July 27th, 2004 Barack Obama gave a influential and significant speech that is remains to be talked about ten years later. This speech took place at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Obama, speaking on the side of most democrats, specified that the John Kerry/John Edwards duo would be the greatest selection to assist in leading America down a greater road. The speech ended in rounds of applause and was both praised and discussed all across America. He used pathos as a means of relating to the greater audience and touches their hearts.

Both point of views draw in different people to side with the two former candidates, leading into the popular, and electoral votes. For Donald, there is of course lots of controversy on popular and electoral votes, rigging the system with Russia, etc. Trump had a total of 62,979,636 votes losing to Clinton in the 2016 race for presidency. But the thing that “matters the most” (not the people of America) but the electoral votes, pushed Trump to presidency. In the 2008 presidential vote, Obama gained 69,498,516 votes outnumbering his competition, John McCain by almost 10 million. Also, outnumbering McCain by electoral votes (365-173). To sum up, Obama and Trump have a lot of differences, differences that I could continue on listing if I didn't have to get on the the similarities.

Answer 2: Clinton Pathos Example: Clinton attitude on how calm she was and, always keep her composer constantly throughout the debate. On the other hand, Trump interrupts her constantly, he was unable to control himself. Especially when Clinton brought up the part of Trump saying “This is a man that called women pigs, slobs and dogs and said women being pregnant was an inconvenience to employer”. As well when

Romney’s ad talks about how his leadership will be once he becomes a president of the United States. The ad starts with the questions to persuade an audience, “What will be different about Romney Presidency?”. Romney intends to show enthusiasm toward the decided Republican voters and to sway the decisions of those that are undecided.

President Obama seems to be a contemporary master of Rhetoric, captivating multiple audiences at once while seamlessly following Cicero’s six parts of speech, but to what effect? In 2013 it was imperative that President Obama connected to multiple facets of people. We saw the beginning of a divided America during this time. Today, we only see this country more polarized. It is nearly impossible to get every family member to agree on a political topic, let alone a whole country. In that regard President Obama’s mission look insurmountable. Though, through the organic weaving of his audiences he attempts to accomplish to impossible. Throughout his speech broadcasted to the American public regarding 2013’s Syrian Civil War, President Obama

On September 26, 1960, John Fitzgerald Kennedy met Richard Milhous Nixon in the first nationally televised presidential debate in American history. The candidates clashed on a variety of domestic issues, including education, infrastructure, health care, and economic policies. The audience was unprecedented in size. Approximately seventy million Americans watched the debate. By the end, Kennedy was a star. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike lauded his poise, confidence, and charisma. On the other hand, viewers criticized Nixon’s haggard expression and sweaty countenance. As it turns out, television had the greatest influence on these perceptions. Those who watched the debate overwhelmingly asserted Kennedy’s clear victory, while

It is not relatively easy to be a great speaker. To pull your audience to you, and have them consuming every sentence you prepare for them, every word you breathe. Your audience has to believe in you, trust you. They need hope and encouragement. Every word produced, and every expression given away, has to be a part of the plan. Essentially, prevailing as a great speaker is an art; an art that must be practiced and polished until a fresh gem is formed. President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are not unaware of this powerful tool.

The Keynote Address at 2004 Democratic National Convention is a popular speech by Barack Obama that demonstrates the power of rhetoric. It was given by Obama, senator of state of Illinois, at the Democratic National Convention on the night of Tuesday, July 27, 2004 AD. The purpose of his address was to call the American voters to elect their (Democratic) presidential nominee John Kerry. He delivered the speech in front of the democratic delegates from all 50 states of U.S.A. It was also streamed live to 9 million people. Using rhetorical devices- ethos, pathos, logos and using other rhetorical devices in an emotional tone, Obama has tried to invoke a sense of unity among Americans and elect John Kerry as their president in order to institutionalize the unity. Mark Lebovich, the chief National correspondent for NY Times Magazine, wrote, “The speech became a touchstone of national unity and soaring manifesto of hope” (Lebovich).

President Obama’s victory speech and Martine Luther King’s speech are two of the most famous discourses that everybody is discussing today. The speeches are representation of racial progression, which starts from the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement to the election of the first black president in the American history. Both speeches are a symbol of hope and a new start of the upcoming changes. In fact, both speeches called for unity and inclusion to achieve the American dream. Furthermore, both occasions had loud voices echo not only in the United State, but also in the global level. Despite the similarity of Obama’s and King’s speeches in the persuasive and inspirational tones, their goals were for different purposes and audience, also the effects on the audience were different.

Eloquently conveying thoughts to the masses is no simple task. It entails more than just a clever arrangement of words, or a refined set of diction. Speeches are far more intricate than that. Since speeches are a profound form of communication that is essentially used to grasp an audience, moving them to a particular mood or mindset, it is imperative that a speech encompass more than just decorative rhetoric. A skillful orator understands how multifaceted crafting and delivering speeches are and are aware of the many devices necessary to make a speech impactful. Tone, resounding gesticulations, rhythm, a crisp but distinctive vernacular, and the usage of artistic proofs are just a few of the significant facets to a moving effective speech. Presidents are perfect paradigms in analyzing the effectiveness and impact of speeches. President Obama, former Presidents Clinton, and Bush will be the crux figures utilized to dissect the speech crafting and speech delivering procedure. By examining the rhetoric of President Obama, and former presidents Clinton and Bush, and exposing the many idiosyncrasies prevalent in their speech deliveries, this paper seeks to prove how impactful and effective speeches are in earning the president influential power and preserving their legacy. This paper will also expose the behind the scene hands that work at writing speeches.

In August 2012, a surprise speaker appeared before the Republican National Convention. As the surprise speaker, actor and film director Clint Eastwood delivered a speech before the Republican crowd. Through his speech, he wanted to appeal audience in order to endorse businessman and politician Mitt Romney, who was nominated as the presidential candidate of the Republican Party against President Barack Obama. For his speech, a chair was brought out to depict the seat Obama was sitting in, who, of course, was not actually present. Eastwood desired to enlighten the audience of the issues he felt were not handled well during President Obama’s first term. His satirical and jocular tone of voice as well as the use of hasty generalization and pathos

I will take a closer look on how Obama emphasizes his speech with stylistic devices.