Have you ever wondered if all of the different heritages and cultures in America would some disband and form into smaller states one example is the civil war were tho southern broke away from the union for varying issues well i think that What makes America stronger may break it up into varying states now until the end then decide if you support this claim or not. In my school reading we’ve read two books these are called “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy and ill explain the similarities and differences then tell you how it ties in with my claim. Now for One similarity between the two. Is dealing with how immigrants were the history of america not that immigrants came after the Declaration …show more content…
”but the very problems of adjustment and assimilation present a challenge to the american idea”(JFK pg 27) now “always on the verge of fisticuffs with another,blacks and whites,gays and straights”(Quindlen pg 15). Well that sums up my main points on similarities, on too differences. My first point in differences is a strong one which is how immigration affects America as a whole. “One of the things that it stands for is this vexing notion that a great nation can consist of entirely refugees”(Quindlen pg 15) while on JFK’s perspective “ Every ethnic minority seeking its own freedom, helped strengthen the fabric of liberty in American life”(JFK pg 24). For my final point on differences which is their disagreement on how individuals are represented.”In America, saying that clinging to ethnicity,in background and custom, has undermined the concept of unity”(Quindlen pg 14). Now JFK says “we were to restrict the definition of immigrants to the 42 million people who came after the signing of The Declaration of Independence”(JFK pg 24). Which sums up their views on
It may be the same era and the same basic theme between both writings, but there are two significant differences: social class and
A good description of the US as it was developing into a free land of diverse peoples; it took quite some time for freedom to benefit all ethnicities
Simply put, America is the land of opportunity. In the past, immigrants have left most of their family, memories, and familiarities with their homeland in search of a better life in America, where jobs were easy to find and the economy was booming. These immigrants formed almost the entire American population, a demographic anomaly in which people from nationalities separated by land and sea; these people come from countries separated by expansive distances can live within the same neighborhood. Both Anna Quindlen with her essay “A Quilt of a Country” and John F. Kennedy with his essay “The Immigrant Contribution” have documented the story of these immigrants and what they have done to contribute to the great country of the United States of America. Both authors have written in their own unique style which has changed the reader’s perspective of their accomplishments, contributions, and sense of community in their new nation. In the essays “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution by John F. Kennedy, they show similar writing styles by both using the formal diction in their writing, and contradict in the way that Quindlen takes a more poetic approach in her writing, while Kennedy, being the President of the United States, uses more sophisticated dictions.
On the other hand, the essays “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy, they differ in the way that Quindlen tends to use the poetic diction in her writing, while Kennedy typically leans towards using the sophisticated diction in his writing. For example, in this passage found in Quindlen’s essay, the dictions of technical, poetic, and sophisticated are used. Quindlen writes: “Once these disparate parts were held together by a common enemy, by the fault lines of world war and the electrified fence of communism.” (Quindlen, 15) The poetic diction used in this section of the essay helps paint the picture that once, the United
There ideas were very similar such as the belief of unalienable rights. That the people have these rights which are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This is what Thomas Jefferson said
A good place to start making sense of the differences is by identifying the two great tensions that we as
In current times, we can see the similarities between the two movements more clearly. One strong example is the passing of House Bill 1523, in Mississippi, which gives individuals
This session took place with the same student who came in to work on an abstract essay for her History Beyond Boundaries class. She wanted to focus on developing a good thesis statement and to make sure her essay was structured and organized. The assignment was to write an abstract on an immigrant community and she chose Guyanese Americans living in Jersey City, New Jersey.
A Nation of Immigrants, John F. Kennedy’s last book’s title, describes our first point well. Kennedy knew the importance that immigrants played in our nation’s history. He speaks of the different “waves” of immigration and their respective contributions to society. Immigrants, in Kennedy’s eyes, are not the menacing and threatening population that some proclaim them to be, but rather are a population who come here in search of freedom and economic opportunity that may not be afforded to them in their countries of origin. The Irish, Germans, Scandinavians, and other European groups that came in great waves during the later 19th and early 20th centuries each influenced the areas they moved to.
To start off, this is a compare and contrast report meaning I will be describing what I felt was different, what was the same, and my opinion on the matter. So, here it goes.
One similarity of the two are that they both deal with respecting the people of the United States. Unlike most countries we have the right to choose our religion, which is a Civil Right.
The United States has Changed from a Melting Pot to a Vast Culture with Varying Racial Backgrounds
The structure assimilation in the African–Americans in their occupational, income, and their educational level. Seeing the difference in pay and they difference in getting a good job to get a better paying job so that they can get out of poverty is just plain awful. Seeing that the United States was founded on immigrants was very interesting to read because I always thought that we were founded by Americans. I see that Trump is trying to get rid of the immigrants and I agree if they are here illegally than they should go back to their country. They need to follow the steps like my husband and come here legally. I can see why people would want to come to the United States because they do want a better life for their families. They have better doctors, technology, and better insurances for the low- income families. There are some countries that don’t have good doctors and the technology that we do. Language is a barrier that we all face and it causes a communication gap for some
‘’After the Declaration of Independence people were restricted to the definition of immigrants along with the 42 million people that came to the U.S’’ (JFK 24). We all shouldn’t be restricted to talk about immigrants when they were in our history. People in the U.S don’t even agree with that. Immigrants are an important factor it shouldn’t matter either way. All of us in america have a right to speak our own opinions and we’re free to speak about the old days so it really shouldn’t matter.
As a nation we advertise the ideal of unity, yet conflicts arise everyday amongst the people. The United States of America is divided amongst different cultures. Not necessarily by the cultures themselves, but by how people are perceiving these cultures and how these cultures go against other. People perceive other cultures by seeing these cultures through filters. Filters form by one’s own experiences and viewpoints. One’s beliefs, who they are as an individual, and by what cultures they are trying to represent also form these filters. Someone could say that are divisions of people are almost an evolutionary adaptation, "What you see are these big themes in human nature: part biology, part culture, part voodoo magic that we don 't understand," said Herzog (Berkowitz). The United States’ conflicting culture influences the daily views of others politically, economically, and socially by dividing the people among demographics.