preview

Comparison Between Benjamin Halpern And Andrew Rosenberg

Decent Essays
Open Document

Benjamin Halpern and Andrew Rosenberg have differing viewpoints as to whether or not our marine resources can be sustainably managed. Halpern believes this can be achieved if traditional fishing should be limited from marine protected areas to allow maintenance of these fisheries. But when speaking about sustainable approaches for our marine resources with the public there’s a lot of resistance because the public tends to view these areas as excluded. In other words, the public is not allowed traditional fishing, water sports, or other similar activities in those areas. That’s why there are different types of sustainable use and management of those resources. Areas like nursery grounds to protect ecosystems are different from other areas settled for fishing species like the commercial lobster, for example. Some species are set aside and protected until they reach a certain growth so then they can eventually migrate to an area where they can be reached by local officials.

It will take a lot of education and training; conversations, discussions and outreach to other areas so people can come and learn the use and value of such projects. It will take some time, but it can happen because at the end of the day we do want a conservation of the …show more content…

These marine protected areas that are being recognized as efficient tools for protecting eco systems and bringing benefits to our local communities. There is still room for improvement because many of these areas today are not effectively managed. There are many differences in their revenues and management profiles. And all of these MPAs share a common problem – a critical lack of sustainable funding for their recurrent expenses and investments. Rosenberg would agree this as one of the main reasons our marine resources can’t be managed. If there is no predictable funding, the MPAs cannot hire staff to manage and plan these

Get Access