preview

Comparison Between Mexico And Walter Nugent's Polk

Decent Essays
Open Document

Mexico does not have a voice in this conversation. It is a more preferred to have the best candid approach that all sides are given on the actual account. Neither of these accounts takes part of the losing side. While both Walter Nugent’s Polk trying to be a broader on both sides perhaps trying to save face with Mexico while stilling having the pride and authority natural of America in justification of taking land and defended the right to do so. Norman A Grarbner His retelling show Polk as a man who was not looking to provoke war but the expansion of military was to add protection and defense from Mexico. Both agree that because Mexico was in a vulnerable position that it left Mexico open for their own land to be taken and their authority to be belittled and ignored. It was the consciousness and understanding by the leaders and generals within America that are in question. Was there willing ignorance for Polk like Nugent suggest or was there an honest attempt at pocketing land in a good nature as Grarbner brings up? …show more content…

There is no denying on the circumstances that affected the talk and threat of war. Polk tried to buy California from Mexico when Mexico refused to sell. His need to have expansions from one end to the content to the other was at the end all accomplished by bullying imperialisms. You do not even have to argue whether or not his willingness to have a peacefully and not have an actual war. The fact has he invaded borderland with the intention of starting and ramping up the feud where tensions and problems already existed. “Polk mistakenly believed that the application of military pressure would convince Mexicans to…exchange land and national honor with money.” (Page.

Get Access