Comparison Of Age Of Enlightenment, By Thomas Hobbes, And Karl Marx

Have you ever wondered how the United States economy came to be? Why do people open certain businesses? Why do they sell certain products? How do we come up with the prices for these products? These are pretty big questions! Adam Smith, an influential economist of the 1700s, is responsible for at least some of the answers to these questions. He inspired much of our country's current economic policies when he wrote the book The Wealth of Nations in 1776.

The formation of government is one of the central themes for both Hobbes and Locke. Whether or not men naturally form a government, or must form a government, is based on man’s basic nature. According to Hobbes, a government must be formed to preserve life and prevent loss of property. According to Locke, a government arises to protect life and property. Governments are born of inequality and formed to administer equality.

John Locke believed he could improve government in society. “Creatures of the same species and rank should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection” and “ When the government is dissolved, the people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new government”(Document A).This means that People need to create their own government when the past one is gone. With this task they need to establish laws on what they think fit and that people will follow. These laws need to be fair and impartial so they give everyone equal rights. That is how philosophers during the enlightenment believed they could improve society in the area of government.

Philosophers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both created systems in what they believed the ideal government should look like. In the Second Treatise on Government, “Locke held that human beings are born with natural rights of life, liberty, and property; they establish the state to protect these rights”. John Locke’s view on government conceptualizes the idea of the natural rights: life, liberty and property. It conveys that every citizen is born with natural rights and that the government is morally obligated to uphold them. By pushing for rights and freedom, Locke convinced people to think about self-upliftment, which establishes that the people should fight for justice. Rousseau, on the other hand brings more of an idea that the government ought to serve the general will, using his social contract. “The clauses of this contract...the total alienation of each associate, together with all of his rights, to a whole community” (The Social Contract). By having a utilitarian approach, Rousseau believes that the general will of the population supercedes every other criteria, meaning that with anything that the government does, it must have the people’s consent. This ideology reinforced ‘no taxation without representation’, as the people began to believe that it is their right to decide what is just. However, none of these ideas could have impacted

One famous influential philosopher was John Locke. Locke was born in England in the mid 17th century and lived through both the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution. He strongly believed in equality for all men. In his book Second Treatise on Civil Government, he says that “creatures of the same species and rank…should be equal amongst another without subordination or

John Adams once said, “Fear is the foundation of most governments.” Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx all grew up in a time of war and witnessed the same events that caused them to create their idea of government. Hobbes learned that people are naturally wicked, Locke learned that people all had natural rights. Karl Marx thought that the social order did not matter. All of them concluded that their governmental plan was the most reliable form of governing. They all had great ideas for government, but John Locke’s ideas would best fit today’s societies, and would best fit in with Adam’s Smith’s ideas.

John Locke theory about government and the governed was more equitable to the people. His theory was fair because it wasn't anything like Hobbes. John Locke believed the purpose of government was to end the state of nature and give people certain protections. But he also believed that the government should protect the people's natural rights. John Locke believed the government can only be legitimate, or valid, if it is based on a social contract

Human nature and its relevance in determining behaviors, predictions, and conclusions has caused dispute among philosophers throughout the ages. Political philosophy with its emphasis on government legitimacy, justice, laws, and rights guided the works of the 17th and 18th century philosophical writings of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Through Thomas Hobbes world-renowned publication Leviathan and Rousseau’s discourses on basic political principals and concepts, each man validated their thoughts on human nature and what is required for a successful society within their respective government confines. The distinct differences between Hobbes and Rousseau’s opinions on the natural state of man frame the argument of the different

Adam Smith, saw mercantilism as grossly inefficient, stating that the most basic misconception in the system was that “wealth consists in money” and that true wealth was based on what purchasing power a unit had. (SSK, p. 36) Adam Smith viewed the shift from this government-centric system, the increase in productivity, the unshackling of the economy from government chains, and the dilution of nobel power, as a harmonious illustration of the capitalist system at work. Smith believed that when human beings responsibly pursued their own interest, a system of “natural liberty” would be formed, as the market or “invisible hand” would naturally lead to the betterment of capitalist society as a whole. (Appleby 2011, p. 91) Thus Smith was both a moralist, and a utilitarian to some degree, his theories fundamentally founded on what he believed would be best to better all citizens, across all socio-economic strata. Smith believed in stripping a way of unnecessary government regulations, but still believed the government should actively prevent coercion between it’s citizens. (SSK, p. 39) Although Smith, and Marx both

According to Spark notes, Hobbes promoted that monarchy is the best form of government for the people and the only one that can guarantee peace for their nation. Hobbes said there must be a supreme sovereign power of some kind in the society, without stating definitively which sort of sovereign power. In Leviathan, however, Hobbes argued that absolutist monarchy was the only right form of government.

John Locke was been one of Americas most significant figures who influence how the country’s political system works today. Locke redefined the whole nature of the government, his views were similar to Thomas Hobbes’ ideas (Hobbes concluded that people are incapable of ruling themselves because it’s in our nature to self-centered not need to a strong leader to control us), however Locke was more optimistic about people’s ability to reason to help avoid tyranny. In Locke’s Second Treatise of Government he identified the basis to a reasonable government. According to Locke a ruler should gain their authority by the people who will be governed because the duty of the government is to protect the natural rights its people (life, liberty, and property), and said that if the government failed to protect these rights, the people should have the right to overthrow its government. These ideas greatly influence Thomas Jefferson when writing the Declaration of Independence. Federalism has also greatly impacted the political system in the United States because it’s the relationship between the authority and people. There are many ways the government can be divided. For example, a cooperative federalism is when the federal government governs unlimitedly and forces lower governments to supervise and enforce national

Some of the founding fathers have been firm believers in the ideas posed in John Locke’s “Second Treatise of Government”. The one idea that can be seen quite clearly is the complete dissenting stance taken by Locke on the thought of monarchy in civil government. “Absolute monarchy,

While Hobbes and Rousseau address many of the same issues and topics in both The Leviathan as well as The Discourses, the way that Hobbes and Rousseau look at these issues such as, human nature, the state, and inequality are extremely different from each other. In some cases Hobbes and Rousseau’s opinions on these certain ideas are completely contradicting and opposite of each other. While it is tough to say which viewpoint, Hobbes’ or Rousseau’s is correct, one or the other can be considered sounder by their logic and reasoning. The view that Hobbes takes on the matters of human nature, the state, and inequality is sounder and more logical than that of Rousseau.

Adam Smith is considered to be the founder of a major field called Microeconomics, which is concerned with the behavior of individual entities such as markets, firms, and households. In 1776 Smith published The Wealth of Nations, a series

As a result of looking through Thomas Hobbes’ view on monarchy and John Locke’s view on democracy, both perspectives provide a vast amount of information of an ideal government. In Locke’s book, Second Treatise of Government, chapter 11 is devoted to legislative power, which Locke identifies as the most important part of the government. Locke provides rules for this legislative power. The first is the preservation of society. No one can challenge the power of the legislative body, or pass laws of their own. This power is invested in the body of the majority. In this chapter, he brings up a constant