We as people often interpret ourselves as powerful but yet powerless. In the book Of mice and men and the poem “To a mouse” both demonstrate how not only people are powerless and powerful but how emotions can be too. Both, the book and the poem show these ways through feelings, actions, and their thoughts. Right from the beginning we are introduced to two characters, George and Lennie. From then on we grow with the characters personalities and traits, but there's something that sticks out between these two. We learn that Lennie has some kind of mental disability and George looks over him. It never really starts clicking in the minds of the readers that there is something wrong between these two until closer to the end of the book where Lennie
Carlson had three main reason to shoot Candy’s dog it stunk, it was old, and was in pain according to him. The dog stunk up the bunkhouse so the guys couldn't sleep at night. The dog could barely walk and looked terrible and filled with pain. So Carlson said “i'll take him out back and shoot him, won't even feel a thing”. At first candy was not going to let him shoot him but realized it was for the better.
“Warren Lee Hill, a man with an IQ of 70, Was put to death Tuesday despite international protests that Georgia was executing a man with a child’s intellect.” Both Warren Hill and Lennie Small from John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, suffered the same fate of death. Both men suffering from Mental Retardation. George Milton murdering Lennie and, Georgia wrongfully “executing” Warren. Some people believe George was justified because he killed Lennie out of love, and it was the right thing to do for that certain moment in time. However, the opposite is true because George was not justified and should be punished for killing Lennie because he didn’t let the police handle the issue, Lennie is like a child in his own way and shouldn’t face death, And they could have just locked him in jail or prison instead of taking a life.
In Chapter 25, Jack completes actions that are due to him finding Babette’s bottle of the tablet Dylar. Jack takes a tablet out of the bottle and brings it to Winnie, the neurochemist at the university. “What can you tell me about it?” Jack said to Winnie. The reason why Jack decides to bring the single tablet of Dylar to Winnie is because he is eager to know what the tablets actually do to his wife. Whenever Jack tries to confront Babette about the tablets, she always avoids the question and moves onto a different subject, which makes Jack even more eager to find out the reason on why she takes Dylar and constantly avoids the topic. Jack is very motivated to find out what Dylar is and goes out of his way to search for Winnie, who frequently moves her way across
There is an exciting chase across the countryside. These two men jump into the Salinas River. There is this Lady that is in a red ripped dress and running after these two figures named George and Lennie. The hook in the movie is very different from the book. It brings a lot of tension to the audience. George is a protective and caring friend. Lennie is really generous and sweet but also forgets a lot of things. Curley is a very angry and selfish man. Curley’s wife is sympathetic and lonely she doesn’t get to talk to anyone besides her husband Curley. Crooks is a crippled but nice man and he says s’pose a lot. Slim is very understanding. Candy is a very old but sweet man who has a very old dog that is in pain.
The common emotion these two dogs caused the narrator was embarrassment. In paragraph one, it talks about a Scotch terrier that had puppies out in the public. This states, “...my moment of keenest embarrassment was the time a Scotch terrier named Jeannie, who had just had six puppies...had the unexpected seventh and last at the corner of Eleventh Street and Fifth Avenue…” This would be quite embarrassing just due to the fact that it took place on a street corner. While the narrator’s dog was having its seventh and final puppy, there were people walking, biking, and driving cars. Lots of people would have seen this which would be a huge embarrassment to practically anybody. Also, in paragraph two it clearly states that the other dog, a large
The rabbit was telling the truth he should of just listen to him. but George was trying to put him to rest because he was struggling in life.If he would not killed him they would killed him and Lennie. The rabbit was telling him the true. But if Lennie was still alive the cops would been looking for them because they are not supposed to be there. Lennie trust George because in the past they been together that the only friend that Lennie had. George has always told Lennie if he was in trouble to hide be hind a bush.Also in chapter 1 there was a snake trying to kill a rabbit but now on chapter 6 the rabbit was trying to kill the snake because he wanted to get revenge. When George tells Lenni “Gonna do it soon ...Ever’body gonna be nice to you.
Although it would seem George betrayed Lennie’s trust, George was justified in his decision to shoot Lennie because of Lennie’s actions and safety.
Nelson Mandela, the first black president of South Africa, once stated that “we owe our children, the most vulnerable citizens in our society, a life free of violence and fear.” Mandela’s belief reveals that society has a great influence on the minds of its youth. If children are protected from a life of violence, they will grow up to be a strong, healthy, and ideal representation of our world; in contrast, if the youth are exposed to violence and fear, they themselves will become destructive. Books, for instance, are a common influence on the youth due to their varying content. A case in point of books’ effects on young adults is the controversy over John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men because
Turning a plot from a book into the plot of a movie can be either a cataclysm or a box office sellout. One of the major tribulations of adapting a novel plot into a movie plot is that of omitting and implanting events into the storyline. In the case of the film adapted version of John Steinbeck’s novella, Of Mice and Men, the plot is well-maintained; however there are some key omissions and additions to the plot of the motion picture. It is the maintaining of the plot with appealing alterations to it that marks the movie, Of Mice and Men, a five star film.
George starts out by setting the scene that he was hated by a large number of people. That in his daily routine he was insulted by several thousand and this got on his nerves. Also, the white women that went to the bazaar would most defiantly have their dress spit on by the Burmese. This was no place for Europeans and they should leave this wretched place immediately. George hated this job more than he could make clear in his writing. George is showing the hatred that the Burmese had for European’s because of British rule. In the scene with the elephant by the paddy fields, George is torn between two emotions that either make him a hero or he will continually get laughed at and ridiculed by the Burmese. If he didn’t shoot the elephant he would
Throughout the history of the world, people with mental disabilities have been wrongly punished for their behavior. Unfortunately, this continues even today. Lennie Small in John Steinbeck’s novel Of Mice and Men along with Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote from The Ingenious Gentleman Don Quixote of La Mancha are both examples of this unjust treatment. Don Quixote sees himself as a gallant knight in a world where knight-errantry has become extinct. On the other hand, Lennie is a child in an adult’s world. Due to not seeing the world as it is “supposed” to be, both are punished by the people for their misguided actions.
From certain structures to happy endings comes a new genre. Modernism, these abstract pieces were Modernist pieces in American literature are often well known for being different and innovative, abstract and interesting. Not all of characteristics are found in each and every piece of modern literature. Of Mice and Men is a modernist piece that follows a story about that follows two protagonists by the name of Lennie and George. George and Lennie worked together and are a family.
The ending of the novella of Mice and Men, specifically the failure of the plan for the farm and the death of Lennie - is inevitable because Steinbeck wanted to challenge his 1930's readers about the injustices in American society during the Depression. He uses the ranch as a metaphor for American society, where people are marginalised based on artificial barriers and where the vulnerable are treated with cruelty. A "happy" ending where the dream of the farm was fulfilled would have shown that there was no problem with society and how it was run. This would have reduced the impact on Steinbeck's readers and wouldn't have opened their eyes to what he felt society had become. The tragic ending is inevitable to show the political intention Steinbeck
Tragedy in life can be used to demonstrate the ultimate display of compassion and love, which truly demonstrates the qualities of men. In life people create attachments and bonds, craving companionship over isolated individualism. There is a endless cycle and chain of events that cause the annihilation of bounds which leads to tragedies bringing sadness. In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck focuses the reader 's attention on the bond between two individuals George and Lennie, who are running from past experiences trying to start anew chasing their American Dream unaware of what 's lurking ahead. Through craftsmanship, nature, transnational connections, evocative imagery, and symbolism,
Throughout the novel Of Mice and Men, it is clear no two characters view themselves as equals. As the plot develops. John Steinbeck makes it apparent that the cold nature of racism and discrimination are a big part of 1930’s American Life. Despite the characters’ inability to measure superiority over one another based on wealth, they still manage create a hierarchy of worth based on race, age, gender and mental capability. In the novel, it is friendship and the endless pursuit of the American Dream that attempts to redeem these negative qualities.