preview

Comparison Of My Worldview And Interpretive Paradigm

Decent Essays
Open Document

My own worldview would be most similar to the interpretive paradigm. I’m definitely a humanistic scholar. Just like the book states, I believe that, ’meaning is presumed to be subjective and unique to the individual, even though meaning is likely influenced by social processes’ (Dainton & Zelley, 2015, p. 24). I am subjective and think that we all interpret the world in our own ways. In my worldview, I say that there are different names and labels we use to structure or construct our own reality. Therefore, I take a nominalist stance when it comes to ontology. We all have our own understanding of reality and we all interpret the world around us in different ways. People may experience the same thing, but feel differently towards it. Everything that happens has multiple and intersubjective meanings. This stance emphasizes that fact that every human being has a different perspective, and that there is no right or wrong way that we can view reality. …show more content…

I take a subjective position when it comes to epistemology. Doing research and collecting data isn’t the way to go because you can’t find generalized knowledge. Using qualitative methods such as ‘ethnography and qualitative surveys’, are much more useful when it comes to understanding an individuals point of view (Dainton & Zelley, 2015, p. 25). This stance emphasizes individual interpretation and the fact that knowledge is relativistic. Lastly, in my worldview, I say that we all have free will. I do not agree with the deterministic stance when it comes to voluntarism. To only a certain extent are our choices shaped by our environment and biology. Mostly, our actions are voluntary. Each individual has the ability to have free will and not a determined path set out for

Get Access