Comparison Of Terrorist Attacks And Gun Control In Europe

Gun control is a particularly sensitive issue in the U.S. a truth that most other first-world countries find boundless. Regardless of a rash of prominent various killings in the previous a few years, most Americans stay antagonistic to any further confinements on gun control. It is broadly trusted that groups are more secure where residents are allowed to buy weapons to shield themselves. Among U.S. presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton remains solitary in hostility that entrance to gun control is out of parity. Interestingly, most Republican contenders are solidly against gun control. Ted Cruz, overlooking the proof, says, "On the off chance that you take a gander at the purviews with the strictest weapon control laws, just about no matter what, they have the most elevated crime rates and the

* In Japan and England many police on patrol do not carry firearms because in those countries, gun control has decreased the number of guns used by criminals.

Often, detractors point to countries like Switzerland, which have high levels of gun ownership and low gun violence, as examples of why gun control is not needed. This, however, ignores the fact that while the Swiss do have many guns, they need a license to privately own a gun, they are not allowed to possess automatic weapons, and they are not allowed to publicly carry guns without a permit (Palmer, “Firearms-Control Legislation and Policy: Switzerland.”). The Swiss have been able to maintain a low-violence gun culture because of their sensible gun control laws.

Imagine the world with only law enforcement offices and the United States Military with firearms. How would we be able to protect ourselves and our property? Gun Control is a violation of our Second Amendment because it limits who can own a firearm and it restricts our right to protect ourselves and our property.

The second amendment of United States constitution said “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was embraced on December 15, 1791, taking in consideration that American citizens have a natural right to self-defense and they can help to accomplish the following purposes:

According to most analysis of the lone-wolf terrorist, the lone-wolf terrorist is identifiable by a few characteristics. However, Bartol and Bartol list seven main characteristics in textbook. The lone-wolf terrorist may identify or sympathize with extremist movements, but they operate individually. Since they operate alone, they act with the influence of a leader or hierarchy. They may often strive for notoriety on the behalf of an interest group. Because their plans are well throughout in advance, it is consider to be premeditated. Unlike other terrorist, the lone-wolf appears to have suffered from some form of mental illness. Lastly they may prefer solitude instead of the companionship of friends because they lack interpersonal and social skills (Bartol & Bartol, 2014, p337).

Mira Kamdar, a French writer, writes her article "America's Gun Madness, as Seen from Europe" to inform her audience about the foolish lack of rules America seems to have on guns compared to other European countries. Kamdar's mother lives in a small city in Oregon, which was recently in the news for the mass shooting at a community college. This story not only made national news for America, but according to Mira, made international news to countries like France. After receiving this news, Mira writes this article to compare and contrast the gun laws in France and what seems the lack of gun laws and regulations in the United States. A mass shooting like the one at Umpqua Community College and even Sandy Hook Elementary School stun citizens

Gun ownership in certain countries, such as the United States, has increased while others have seen little to no difference in gun ownership rates, such as in the United Kingdom. Those opposed to gun control will use evidence for a decrease in homicides through an increase in gun ownership. Those

As a result of all the violence occurring around the world, there have been many discussions about gun control laws. Many people want to say that there should be more gun control laws without even thinking of the consequences that could emerge, such as an increase of more violent crime. For example, a study by Harvard shows that Russia has only one‐ninth Norway’s gun ownership rate but a murder rate 2500% higher. Every other European country follows this pattern

Gun control issue have become very debatable in the U.S. There was a study about how many people die in mass shooting. In fact, the article reports that the percentage of dying in a car crash is mover 100 times more than dying by a gun. Furthermore, there was a study performed about Europe and their gun laws. It was more likely that a region that had laws in place where people could not have guns. This statistics is fascinating because the research shows that if more than 3 people were killed happened with restricted gun

In this article, Wilson argues that gun control laws won’t suffice because Americans will always manage to access guns, guns are used for selfdefense, Americans are naturally violent so murder rates won’t decline, and gun control in England has proved ineffective in the past.

Perhaps gun control is one of the most controversial topics in America, appealing to the emotions of those who support, as well as those who oppose the regulation of firearms. Although people take various stance on the issue, supporting some aspects for control and rejecting others, the more rigid individuals tend to split into pro gun and anti gun control. The pro gun group express themselves as the supporters of constitutional right to bear arms according to the Second Amendment. Advocates of gun control distinguish themselves as struggling for a more civilized society against gun nuts and profit driven firearms manufacturers. The issue of gun control is a political question that each side has tremendous interest in the outcome. Hence, positions tend to solidify and supporters of one position tend to deny any merit in the place taken by others, each side detracts those who they disagree with. Researchers who are meticulous in presenting research results can become ardent in their argumentation as the most supporters of a enthusiastic political position. Nevertheless, data indicate that numerous nations that have more stringent gun controls does not necessarily show the correlations with lower rate of violent crimes, leading to the conclusion that the United States ' current gun regulation requires comprehensive revisions. Until then, Gun regulation of the United

The United States’ homicide rate (5.9 deaths per 100,000 people as of 2005) is higher when compared to other countries: Sweden with 1.3, Canada with 1.5, and Australia with 1.3. To go along with these rates, America has a higher gun ownership with 39% when compared to Canada with 29.1%, Australia with 19.4% and Sweden with 15.1%. Many argue that these statistics prove the effectiveness of gun control. Fewer amount of guns equals less crime.

Further, despite the fact that gun ownership in the U.S. increased enormously during the 1990’s, there was a consistent, dramatic reduction of criminal violence. In fact, homicide and violent crime have plunged over the last 15 years. Considering that 18 of 25 countries surveyed had an increase of violent crime, America’s large decline is impressive. Moreover, Norway, Finland, Germany, France, and Denmark also have a high rate of private gun ownership, and the murder rates in these countries are as low as or lower than developed nations with less gun ownership (Kates & Mauser, 2007).

“A lone-wolf terrorist operates individually, does not belong to an organized group or network and conceives and directs the modus operandi without any direct outside command or hierarchy” (Spaaji 2012, p. 16). Lone actor or autonomous cell (LA/AC) terrorism is emerging as a major threat and presents extreme difficulties for the intelligence community, chief among them is the fact that this type of terrorism is much harder to detect and prevent. “Although the state’s capacity to monitor is substantial, individuals are still able to operate under the radar screen and commit violence with little predictability” (Michael 2014, 49) The absence of a central or parent organization reduces, or eliminates in the case of lone actors, the “chatter” associated with planning an attack (Michael 2014, 50). These types of actors leave a much smaller mission footprint that has proved difficult to detect and therefore these attacks have proven difficult to prevent. Current research is lacking on this topic, as evidenced by the fact that lone wolf and small, autonomous cell attacks continue to occur and with alarming frequency: “There have been lone wolf terrorist attacks throughout history; the first vehicle bombing in the US happened when a horse-drawn wagon exploded on Wall Street in September 1920, killing more than 30 people and injuring more than 200 others. However, in recent years there has been a proliferation of lone wolf attacks in many countries” (Simon, 2013). Since terrorist