Comparison Of Warehouse Performance During The First Five Months

1329 Words Feb 15th, 2016 6 Pages
The comparison of warehouse performance during the first five months can be reviewed by looking at exhibit 3.A 's 5 month performance status. Columns in 2013 and 2012 with a 5 Months performance involving units shipped comparisons are as follows.
In the table the improvements only considering units shipped are highest among the letters A-D opposed to G-H. The A-D warehouses are respectively: Denver, Portland, Chicago, and Boston. The G-H warehouses are respectively: Atlanta, St. Louis, Los Angeles, and Fargo. The most impressive improvements in order from greatest to least considering shipping were for Denver, Portland, and Chicago. It is vital the company takes notice of Chicago 's improvement due to the larger volume it also held in 2012 than other warehouse locations. However, the question is comparing performance during the first five months of the years; thus, we need to look at the unit and cost analysis when comparing the shipments. Notice St. Louis cost per unit shipped is the only successful improvement. The cost for the first five months of 2012 was $9.97, that then lowered to $9.07 for the first five months of 2013. We find this information by taking the warehouse cost and dividing by the shipped units that year. For example $23,232 divided by 2,331 units makes $9.97 while caculating 2013 yeilds an improved $9.07. Other warehouses grew in cost per unit shipped during the 5 months when considering 2012 and 2013. Additionally, Denver was on strike and had 15 days…
Open Document