Comparison: Petrarchan and Shakespearean Sonnets

1188 WordsJun 20, 20185 Pages
Through the form of sonnet, Shakespeare and Petrarch both address the subject of love, yet there are key contrasts in their style, structure, and in the manner, each approaches their subjects. Moreover, in "Sonnet 130," Shakespeare, in fact, parodies Petrarch's style and thoughts as his storyteller describes his mistress, whose "eyes are in no way as the sun" (Shakespeare 1918). Through his English poem, Shakespeare seems to mock the exaggerated descriptions expanded throughout Petrarch’s work by portraying the speaker’s love in terms that are characteristic of a flawed woman not a goddess. On the other hand, upon a review of "Sonnet 292" from the Canzoniere, through “Introduction to Literature and Arts,” one quickly perceives that…show more content…
With no discernible connection to different works by the creator, it is evident that this sonnet remains solitary, with no qualifications hinting at its circumstance. In his contention, Shakespeare's narrator symbolically paints a blemished picture of his companion. Shakespeare's dialect in this piece is precise and factual, in opposition with Petrarch's, which romanticizes his subject and places her on a platform. The portrayal of the fancy woman is severe to the degree of slightly offensive. His style is comparative to Petrarch's, and Shakespeare appears to reflect that same custom of proclamation, contrasting his woman's characteristics with the opulence of nature. Their likenesses part, however, in their method of portraying their subjects. Shakespeare's story voice is exceptionally repressed and matter-of-fact. Shakespeare, in every line, reveals that every aspect of his companion fails to meet the excellence discovered in his characteristic correlations. Shakespeare's storyteller deliberately works through the contention utilizing dialect to reflect Petrarch's style while giving a much less romanticized perspective of his subject. Until the viewer achieves the determination of "Sonnet 130," it might not appear that this is an affection poem whatsoever. It is through the narrator’s pronunciation of his adoration for the woman during the determination that we uncover the speaker
Open Document