Comparison of Fertilizers on Plant Growth

It is also affordability, convenience, and effectiveness in nourishing plants; however it can also have disadvantages when using chemical based fertilizers. Plants will show signs of lacking nutrient the inorganic fertilizer was separate help over organic choices, it depends on soil organisms to first, break down the organic substance before the nutrients can be out. Inorganic fertilizer’s fast delivery elements and minerals eliminate this potential problem. Inorganic fertilizer, which is often reasonably priced, consists of mineral-based nutrients manufactured for instant application on crops. Unlike the organic variety, inorganic fertilizer does not need to decompose over time to supply nutrients to plants. Inorganic fertilizer contained balanced amounts of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus to supply plants and to grow it faster. These are the substance of chemical gain from the processes in cultivating the first one is urea. Nitrogen as urea can be lost to the atmosphere if fertilizer urea remains on the soil surface for total periods of time throughout warm

Industrial organic is better for the environment because the farmers aren´t pouring toxic fertilizers and pesticides into the soil. In industrial organic, farmers are using organic fertilizers such as compost and manure to

Part 3 Pros – Organic foods is good for nature. According to big oven.com, organic farms produce less waste and use less energy compared to inorganic farms. Synthetic pesticides that are used in conventional food can harm local wildlife. Organic farms make sure that their animals are fed a natural diet and kept in “free- range conditions”.

The purpose of this lab was to investigate and observe the effects of organic vs. synthetic fertilizers on plant growth by planting lima beans with added amounts of fertilizers, and to see how does adding different nutrients to the soil affect the growth of the lima bean? A significant difference was examined between the plants that contained manure and miracle growth, unfortunately the plant with no additional fertilizers (Plant #3) did not show any growth. The plant that grew the most was the one that contained manure, to an extent the one that grew the most in a short period of time was the one that contained miracle growth, as shown in figure I. The hypothesis explaining if the Lima Bean plant contains synthetic nutrients in the soil then

While experimenting with the green beans, the seeds exposed to the organic plant food germinated within five days of the experiment and the seeds exposed to the chemical plant food germinated within six. The seeds that acted as the control had been expected to grow the least, however, it was surprising that they did not grow at all. Both the chemical and organic fertilizers proved to have positive results on the plants. It was also unexpected when the seeds exposed to the chemical plant food surpassed the height of the other experimental seeds after being shorter. The predicted reason for the increase in growth with seeds given Miracle Grow was because chemical fertilizers automatically store up the nutrients and disperse it constantly throughout

Over Fertilization occurs when more nutrients are added to the soil than the growing plants can utilize unused nutrients are then carried away by irrigation or rain water. Several factors can result in over fertilization. For example, it is difficult to determine precise nutrient content in some organic fertilizers, like manure. As a result, actual nutrient levels may exceed estimated content, and over fertilization occurs. Also, gardeners may incorrectly diagnose poor plant growth as a nutrient deficiency and apply fertilizer as a corrective amendment. In fact, the true problem could be unhealthy roots, poor soil conditions or other improper care. To prevent overfertilization, have soil tested regularly to determine accurate nutrient levels and only apply fertilizer as

While watching the video-presentation of Tony Avants’ speech on soils, I came to realize the importance of not only the quality of soil that one begins with, but also the quality of products used to enhance it. He states that there is a common gardening myth that plants do not recognize the difference between chemical and organic fertilizers. While that may be true for plants, the microbes in the soil know the difference and have a preference. They prefer the fertilizers made by nature. It would be easy to add chemicals to increase the Carbon these microbes feed off, but it would be much more cost effective, and better for the environment to use a Carbon-rich compost to fertilize one’s soil.

Organic fertilizers for soil is a way to reduce compost waste as materials decompose the waste will get buried and produce greenhouse gases. Avoid is possible burning dead leaves due to the fact that this creates air pollution, and putting them out with the trash to fill up the landfill. Compost your leaves and any yard debris, or take them to a recycling center. Pull weeds instead of using harmful chemical this will reduce pesticides to the soil.

The controversy in using synthetic fertilizers is argued between large production farmers attending to the global demand of food and environmentalists concerned with the alternative effects on the environment. Although there are more in depth issues depending on the type of fertilizer being applied. The environmental issues at hand has many questioning if we should even allow the usage of synthetic fertilizers. Though the original form of soil enrichments were primarily made of animal excrement and decomposed food matter, differing greatly to what has predominantly been used today in agricultural production. Today we use synthetic fertilizers which contain compounds that are more “man made.” These compounds are things such as Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Phosphate, Superphosphate, and Potassium Sulfate, which derive from the by-products of the

By not using multiple chemicals to control crops, organic farming also ends up being better for the environment. Organic farmers use natural fertilizers such as manure so that they do not release artificial chemicals into the ground (“Organic Food”). In June of 1999 a report made by the U.S. Geologic Survey, found that most waterways and ground water supplies in both urban and rural areas contained enough pesticides to endanger aquatic life (“pesticides”). These chemicals can also leak into streams and encourage the growth of algae and intoxicate the water (“298 John P. Reganold et.al”). Furthermore studies have found that water contaminated with pesticides may accumulate in the

The reason we conducted the experiment was to learn how much fertilizer to use on lawn grass, and how it affects grass. We found in the research that fertilizer helps the plant grow (with the right amount) in long amounts of time. Our hypothesis was if we change the amount of fertilizer in the grass plants soil than the amount with 1 tsp. will be the tallest and healthiest, because it will not be too much or too little but just right. To create this experiment we filled cups with soil and poked holes for the grass seeds. Then we watered the seeds and added the amount of fertilizer needed to each cup. An answer to our question is that fertilizer does affect plant growth with the right amount of time needed. In our experiment the plants without

The contaminants had a direct correlation on plant growth and showed that the control group had the highest average plant growth rate. This showed that this was a testable experiment by comparing more than 3 groups on the average height of plants throughout 4 weeks. A source of error that affected this result was that Group 3 did not water the radish plants (Raphanus sativus) during week 3. This caused plant groups 1 and 2 grow higher than the control. If the plants were watered with the contaminants the results would be different and on average the control plant would have the greatest height. The experiment generally had accurate results and no outliers in the data recorded. Replication was achieved during this study because 3 data sets were recorded under the same experimental conditions, each given the same amount of water (50 ml), the amount of light, and percentage of contaminated water. Contaminants are phytotoxic to the soils of plants and show that there is a negative effect on growth. This experiment shows that humans should be mindful of the contaminants used in the environment because it can have a negative effect on

Organic farming is becoming an increasingly popular market throughout the world. (Adam, 2004, p. 666). The aims of organic farming are, to decrease pollution, maintain soil fertility and biodiversity, be more sustainable, and have increased nutritional benefits than conventionally grown foods (Yaping et. al., 2003, p. 298). While the aim of conventional farming is to provide safe, proficient supplies of food, in abundance and at low prices (Trewavas, 2001, p.409). Since 1996, the amount of land in the UK dedicated to organic farming has risen tenfold (Adam, 2004, p. 666). As well, from 1992 to 1997, the amount of certified organic cropland in the US more than doubled (Tafel et al, 2007, p.182 ). The main difference between organic and

First off, organic foods are defined as being grown without the use of pesticides, fertilizers or heavy metals, which are thought to influence the interaction of bioactive chemicals and metabolites present during the growth process (Bernacchia, Preti, & Vinci 2016). Consequently, produce that is grown under normal, unaltered conditions is assumed to cultivate additional substances that benefit our health as compared to inorganic produce (Bernacchia et al.,

The National Organic Standards Boards defines organic agriculture is ìan ecological production management system that promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity. It is based on minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that restore, maintain and enhance ecological harmony. The primary goal of organic