microRNAs (miRNAs) are one type of small RNAs. They are short, single-stranded polynucleotides that involve in post-transcriptional gene regulation and transcription stability modulation. Scientists are trying to understand the homology between miRNAs separated from different animals and plants and the possible miRNA evolution patterns in distinct lineages. Modern technologies include miRNA sequencing, polymer chain reactions (PCR), databases, etc. will assist various researches. miRNAs of Chlorophyta and plants evolved independently. The degrees of complementarity between miRNAs and their targets are different as plants always requires a more accurate complementarity in post-transcriptional processes than animals. However, scientists …show more content…
Trichoplax, the only extant phylum placozoa, is a basal group of Metazoa. They lack miRNA in their small RNA pools so they would have an independent origin compared to all other animals with miRNA expression. Choanoflagellates (Monosiga brevicollis) are one type of unicellular flagellate eukaryotes that are the closest known outgroup to Metazoa. Similarily, Monosiga lacks all genes specific to miRNA. (Grimson et al, 2008). As a result, animal miRNA evolution pathways are dynamic as major miRNA sequences still differs among poriferans, cnidarians and bilaterians.
Other than miRNA sequences from different eukaryotes, several molecular evidences also provide clues that helps imagine the evolution pathways of miRNAs.
First, piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are in the same class of small RNAs alone with miRNA, both RNAs requires a class of enzymes called Dicer to modify them so coevolution between piRNA and miRNA becomes possible. piRNAs are most abundantly expressed in Nematostella, Amphimedon and some mammalians. Class I piRNAs, also called mammalian pachytene piRNAs and class II piRNAs which used to silent some genes are both expressed in mammals and fruit flies prove that these piRNA classes may exist since the origin of metazoans. The piRNA evolution pattern states those two types of small riboregulators have been present since the very early stage of animal life evolution and
By using DNA sequencing software and using comparative DNA alignment programs, scientists can piece together where the differences and similarities align and the percentage of identical DNA between two species. Another method of classifying these gene-swapping organisms is to alter the method of vertical genomics and shift to a new form of lateral genomics (Koonin et al. 2001). A method using vertical, linear genomics alone will not provide enough resources to clearly assign an organism to a taxonomic group. Also, scientists can look at gene loss over time as a method to group these organisms (Koonin et al. 2001). If scientists would rather stick with similarities to define a taxonomic group, the use of genomic instruments can provide a better picture of which genes are highly conserved between organisms of the same group (Doolittle 1999). Researchers have begun to employ this method as the means for best completing a phylogenetic tree. Using alignments of single copy genes conserved in the genome allows for scientists to achieve that vertical pattern of phylogeny that can be lost when focusing on the amount of transferred genes between groups (Lang et al. 2013).
In this project, C. Elegans are hermaphrodite worms that will be used since they are easy to maintain in lab, as well as have short life cycles. The gene that the project attempted to knockdown in C. Elegans with RNAi treatment is the unc-22 gene. RNAi disrupts gene expression in the presence of double stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is complementary to target gene sequence. The unc-22 gene codes for a muscle protein called twitchin in wild-type worms. The Unc-22 is required for muscle regulation and maintenance in C.Elegans. To verify that the RNAi treatment worked, would check the unc-22 mRNA levels in the worms, in addition to phenotype observation.
Double stranded RNA (dsRNA) consists of two complementary strands similar to those of DNA found in all cells. DsRNA is an important part of gene function and expression in eukaryotes and is also found as the genetic material of some viruses. It is known to
This study identifies conserved cis sequences as the primary determinant of RNA editing evolution, but does not rule out a role for either trans factors or Adar proteins. It also opens up future research into how cis sequence changes alter RNA editing level.
Not too long ago, brilliant scientific pioneer, microbiologist and biophysicist Carl Woese presented his groundbreaking find that would revolutionize the scientific world. He and his partners discovered the kingdom consisting of single-celled organisms, which is today referred to Archaea. Thanks to Woese’s discovery, we now classify living organisms in three domains, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Before Woese’s breakthrough, we did not realize how common and important Archaea actually are. Woese specialized in working with ribosomal DNA, which is how he uncovered Archaea. Eugene V. Koonin expresses deep admiration and praise towards Woese in his article. However, Koonin repeatedly judges Woese’s analysis on the evolution of cells as inexact and too general for legitimacy.
Next, they filtered out any CNEs that were less than twelve base pairs in length due to the fact that sequences twelve or more base pairs in length are expected to be found at relatively low rates simply due to chance. The sequences remaining were then collapsed into groups based on sequence similarity, and consensus sequences (termed motifs) were generated for each group. These consensus sequences were generated by calculating a position weight matrix (PWM), which is generally done by looking at each position within a sequence, determining how often each of the four possible nucleotides is present at that position, and assigning higher weights to those nucleotides which occur more frequently at that position. With this newly generated catalog of sequences, the authors further characterized each motif based on conservation.
After the discovery of group 1 introns group 2 introns were found in Azotobacter vinelandii which is a proteobacteria, in Calothrix cyanobacteria spp (Ferat and Michel 1993) and also in Escherichia coli (Ferat et al,. 1994). Previously group 2 introns were known to be existed only in mitochondria and chloroplast of plants and fungi, because of the similarity of group 2 splicing mechanism to the nuclear pre-m RNA introns. So it is believed that group 2 introns are the evolutionary ancestors of the nuclear pre-mRNA introns (Sharp 1991).
In the early stage of development of life on earth on a molecular basis, some believe that self-replicating RNA molecules acted as the ancestral molecule of life before the more complex DNA and protein molecules started to evolve and develop. Stronger evidence has supported the hypothesis of the existence of an RNA world during the origin of life in recent years. The RNA world hypothesis postulates that RNA molecules were utilised to store and transmit genetic information, self-replicate and to catalyse simple chemical reactions without the help of any other proteins or molecules and were able to proceed perpetually. They have the ability fold up into a complex structure which either catalyses a chemical reaction or binds another molecule,
In addition to transcriptional regulation and epigenetic mechanisms, posttranscriptional regulation by microRNAs is also critically involved in the intracellular signaling of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Studies using transgenic mice in which microRNA processing is specifically disrupted in the oligodendrocyte lineage by way of Dicer enzyme knockout have shown that microRNA processing is indispensible for normal CNS myelination (Dugas et al., 2010), and that in vitro OPCs also fail to differentiate in the absence of mature microRNAs. Specifically, three microRNAs including miR-219, miR-138, and miR-338 are found to be elevated by 1-2 orders of magnitude during OPC differentiation into oligodendrocytes, and that miR-219 when induced alone, is sufficient to promote the differentiation (Dugas et al., 2010). The downstream target of miR-219, ELOVL7, is also identified as a main molecular component involved in the development of the Dicer mutant phenotype (Shin, Shin, McManus, Ptacek, & Fu, 2009), and that overexpression of ELOVL7 results in lipid accumulation, which is in turn suppressed by co-overexpression of miR-219. Other important target genes of the above mentioned microRNAs include PDGFRa, Sox6, and Hes5 (Dugas et al., 2010; X. Zhao et al., 2010), all of which serve to
SEMESTER I Course Code UNIT I USZO101 II III I USZO102 II III USZO P1 TOPICS Diversity of Animal Kingdom I Life processes I Ecology Molecular basis of life I Biotechnology I Genetics 2 2 2 Credits L / Week 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
One of the fundamental discoveries of the 20th century was that DNA was the genetic code’s physical structure (Watson & Crick, 1953) and, since then, many studies have disclosed the complicated pattern of regulation and expression of genes, which involve RNA synthesis and its subsequent translation into proteins.
The SAGE method is based on the isolation of unique sequence tags from individual mRNAs and concatenation of tags serially into long DNA molecules for lump sum sequencing. It can be applied to the studies exploring virtually any kinds of biological phenomena in which the changes in cellular transcription are responsible.
There are several examples of poorly conserved non-coding sequences that have known function. Considerations must be made that these sequences are different and thus have different constraints acting on them (Pang et al. 2006, cited in Dinger et al. 2009). The repetitive nature of the genome has previously led to the assumption that transposon-derived sequences are mostly non-functional and not contributors to the genome; new evidence suggests these sequences are part of selection and possibly have a wide range of functions, with examples showing sequences being part of the regulation of RNA polymerase II (Mariner et al. 2008, cited in Dinger et al. 2009). The focus of genomics has largely been on protein-coding sequences, which is a contributing factor to why functional non-coding regions were not detected sooner. There are very few ncRNAs whose functions have been verified, yielding quite a small pool to draw conclusions from; yet this does not negate the mounting evidence in support of function for non-coding sequences from a genome-wide perspective. Further investigations will need to take place to fully assess ncRNAs and the scope of their functions and effects, as well as the possible implications on complexity. A clear current implication is the effect on the concept of the gene driven by new territories within genomics regarding ncRNAs and the need for a new, wider understanding of genes and genetic information
In contrast, eukaryotic cells are more complex than prokaryotes as their transcriptions process are utilize by three different types of RNA polymerase. These polymerases differ in number and type of subunits they contain and also the class of RNA they subscribe. RNA polymerase I, which located in the nucleolus, transcribe ribosomal RNA (rRNA), RNA polymerase II, which located in the nucleoplasm, transcribe messenger RNA (mRNA) and RNA polymerase III, which also located in the nucleoplasm, transcribe both ribosomal and transfer RNA (tRNA). All eukaryotic RNA polymerases are homologous to one another and to prokaryotic RNA
third, different area of study, bees were studied. When studying RNA in bees, scientists found