Nowadays, the society has high expectations of a healthcare professional competency and ability to demonstrate competent performance. Term competency is often used to assess knowledge, skills and to evaluate performance in the practice settings. According to Alfaro-Lefevre (2016), “competency is the ability to accomplish specific skills safely and effectively under various circumstances” (p. 61). Competence encompasses four major elements, such as knowledge, skills, behavior, and judgment (Alfaro-Lefevre, 2016).
One of the competency dimensions for a health care provider is clinical reasoning. In other words, clinical reasoning is one of the core competencies that guides clinical practice of any health care professional. Berman, Snyder, and Frandsen (2015) defined clinical reasoning as a cognitive process in which a clinician utilizes “thinking strategies to gather and analyze client information, evaluate the relevance of the information, and decide on possible nursing actions to improve the client’s physiological and psychosocial outcomes” (p. 144). Levett-Jones et al. (2009) described clinical reasoning as a course of clinical encounters during which clinician collects patient information, processes it and generates an understanding of what is happening with the patient, what is the problem, and only then makes appropriate interventions and evaluates the results. It is important to note that competency and clinical reasoning are the major attributions of a good health
According to Standard HR.1.20 the health care organization must ascertain that the right levels of competencies as well as qualifications are available at each level (JCAHO, 2004). Therefore, the job
The American College of Healthcare Executives Competencies Assessment Tool is a tool that is used for evaluation of one’s personal development. It is given to healthcare executives to analyze themselves especially in their areas of expertise for healthcare management (ACHE, 2016).
It is widely known that early recognition of a deteriorating patient can contribute largely to a successful outcome, through recognising and taking action on the deteriorating health status of the patient (National Consensus Statement, 2010). This report will explore the ways in which deteriorating patients and clinical reasoning are used in the public health care system in New South Wales (NSW).
Alfaro-LeFevre, R. (2013). Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment : A practical approach (Fifth ed.).
The purpose of this paper is to conduct an in depth exploration of the nursing care considerations of patients in a specific clinical area. Through the synthesis of prior knowledge, clinical experiences and skills, evidence based best practices, and care of patients a comprehensive care and teaching plan will be composed. Integration of critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills, combined with evidence-based research will provide confirmation of nursing process comprehension. The inclusion of reviewed literature will further support knowledge and understanding.
Over the past 30 years nursing has evolved from a task-oriented to a logical and systematic approach to care, using theories and models to guide practice. According to Jasper (2007, p117) theories of decision making in medicine tend to favour logical, precise analytical models which are held to be testable, unambiguous and repeatable, therefore satisfying scientific principles. These represent important ideas of certainty and rationality that are intended to provide a sense of security and reliability. When used correctly a nursing model should give direction to nurses working in a particular area, as it should help them understand more fully the logic behind their actions. It should also act as a guide in decision-making and so reduce conflict within the team of nurses as a whole. This in turn should lead to continuity and consistency of the nursing care received by patients according to Pearson et al (1999,p ).
Healthcare Environment competency entails an understanding of the healthcare system and the environment in which healthcare professionals and patients function in. According to Garman (2006, p. 152) there are four general themes or levels of analysis to know and understand: customers, staff, systems and community/environment. This competency can also
The nine core competencies build the framework for the NP to patient-centered focused care. Competencies must be met for the role development for growth of the entry level NP. By interviewing an experienced NP and their views on the nine core competencies, much insight has been gained. Interpersonal communication, collaboration and having integrated the different abilities to gain improvement about nursing practicing with the help of the interview of the APN
Underlying both the clinical decision-making process and the nursing process is the skill of critical thinking. Critical thinking has been described as the ability to gather and process data in such a way as to arrive at the best conclusion using the filters of prior knowledge, experience and external resources to overcome personal emotions, biases, and assumptions. (This description was developed during NUR/300 class, University of Phoenix, S. Colorado, March 16, 2006) Note that critical thinking is described as a
There are five core competencies needed for health care professionals and they are provide patient centered care, work in interdisciplinary teams, employ evidence based practice, apply quality improvement, and utilizing informatics. In this paper, I will go into further detail how providing patient centered care is challenging, how to overcome the challenges, how it relates to my chosen profession, and how this competency can impact delivery of care to patients.
The five core competencies identified by IOM and the sixth added by QSEN, safety, are believed to be necessary to improve both quality and safety of the healthcare system within which nurses work (Multimethod teaching). The six core competencies outlined are patient-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, evidence-based practice, quality improvement, informatics, and safety (Diffusing Qsen). While all competencies are significant to the healthcare system, patient centered care is vital to positive patient outcomes and focuses on the patient’s perspective within the healthcare system.
The development of the nurse’s ability to clinically reason and take appropriate and timely action can, in time, become an instinctive and automatic process. Reflective practice by the nursing professional will highlight the areas in which further improvement is needed. Essentially, it is the responsibility of the individual nurse to identify the need to develop this ability, and the skill to effectively communicate the patient’s condition to the other members of the healthcare team to produce positive patient outcomes.
Clinical reasoning can be defined as, ‘the process by which nurses (and other clinicians) collect cues, process the information, come to an understanding of a patient’s problem or situation, plan and implement interventions, evaluate outcomes and reflect on and learn from the process’ (Levett-Jones & Hoffman 2013, p.4). It requires health professionals to be able to think critically and ensures better engagement and results for the patient (Tanner 2006, p.209). The Quality in Australian Healthcare Study (Wilson 1995, p.460) discovered that ‘cognitive failure’ resulted in approximately 57% of unfavourable clinical events involving the failure to produce and act correctly on clinical information. It also recognises that often nurse’s preconceptions and assumptions can greatly affect patient care and by going through such a process, one can take into account the holistic nature of the patient and provide the best, most appropriate care.
Johnny Obrien aged 79 years, presented to the Emergency Department after a fall at the RSL, resulting in a laceration on his left elbow which required 3 stitches. He lives by himself with no family close by, and has a history of hypertension and alcohol addiction. Clinical reasoning is a cyclic process, where cues are collected and their data processed to come to a conclusion of the patient situation so that appropriate interventions can be implemented and evaluated through reflective practices which allows for further learning (Levett-Jones 2013). Applying these clinical reasoning skills in practice is important as it has a positive impact on patient outcomes, resulting in less adverse effects due to the detection of patient deterioration throughout this process to ensure safe and effective care (Levett-Jones 2010).Subjective data is information from the patient’s point of view, including their feelings, perceptions and concerns, whereas objective data is information that is observable or measurable (Delmar Cengage Learning 2015).
Critical thinking and clinical reasoning are similar in the fact that each term represents a set of methods that guide the nurse to reliable evidence-based practice while delivering care. Critical thinking and clinical reasoning are centered on knowledge base that is associated with the discipline of nursing. With each concept, the nurse must have an existing developed knowledge base in which to apply each concept to. Nurses apply critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills when patient care decisions are made. With both critical thinking and clinical reasoning, information about the patient is collected and examined. They work together to produce clinical judgment. They both direct nursing care to meet patients’ needs resulting in higher quality of care and better patient outcomes.