Competition in Energy Drinks, Sports Drink, and Vitamin-Enhanced

Porter has identified five (5) competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. The forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. Based on the information derived from this analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of this industry.

The threat that substitute products pose to an industry's profitability depends on the relative price-to-performance ratios of the different types of products or services to which customers can turn to satisfy the same basic need. The threat of

A majority of the attractiveness stems from the abnormally low buyer and supplier power. However, this gain is offset by the current low barriers of entry and high competitive rivalry. In order to remain competitive, incumbents must (1) invest heavily in research and development, (2) secure technology via patents, (3) market heavily to monetize products, all of which will diminish bottom line results.

The competition among rivals is very high due to price and non-price factors. Companies try to attract customers to their products by introducing

This force describes the intensity of competition between existing players (companies) in an industry. The results of high competitive pressure could impact prices, margins, and hence, on profitability for every company in the industry.

Defining an industry can be described as drawing a line between the established competitor and the substitute products offered by competitors outside the industry (Porter 1998). “Porter’s five forces provide a framework for an industry and business strategy development to drive the five forces that determine the competitive intensity and attractiveness of a market. The Porter’s Five Forces model helps identify where improvement can be made regarding competitive forces, threat of potential entrants, bargaining power of buyers, and bargaining power of suppliers and threats of substitute products.

The threat of new entrants is significantly low, the bargaining power of suppliers as well as buyers is weak, the threat of substitute products is low, the intensity of rivalry among other competitors is low and complementary products or services are unavailable. If all the above exist then the industry or company is attractive and there is potential gain and growth.

Energy drinks are the largest growing area of the United States beverage industry since, being they were first introduced to the market in 1987. Today, the U.S. market for energy drinks is estimated at $35 billion and is expected to grow the reach $53 billion by the year 2016. The United States is one the world's largest consumer by volume of energy drinks. Given that, roughly 35%-45% of adolescents and young adults admit that they drink at least one energy drink per day. In view of, the market is not regulated; there has been a contentious marketing to adolescents with promises of psychoactive, performance-enhancing, and stimulant drug effects. In upwards of, hundreds of different brands are marketed today, these stimulant drinks typically

Existing Competitors. Rivalry among competitors within an industry use price discounting, new products, marketing, and other techniques to be competitive. Profitability of an industry suffers from high rivalry. The intensity with which companies compete and the basis on which they compete determine to which degree rivalry brings down an industry’s profitability (Porter, 2008). Pure competition is considered by economists as a competition with a high

Competitive rivalry exists between companies with the same or similar products/services and similar markets. Factors to be considered include:

In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders, Coke and Pepsi, in fact, between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD, the introduction of diet and flavored varieties, and brand extensions. There is couple of reasons why the industry is so profitable such as market share, availability and diversity and brand name and world class marketing.

Energy drinks have outperformed the growth in carbonates in the last few years, and present a substantial opportunity for beverage manufacturers to extract further growth from their sales. There are many driving forces of change and critical success factors in the energy drink industry. Companies such as Coke Cola and Pepsi contend with criticism from health officials due to the excessive caffeine in most high-energy drinks. However, before the 2000’s consumers were accustomed to carbonated soft drinks as the traditional beverage. The shift to an energy drink, sports drink, and vitamin enhanced waters increased sales while becoming an alternative beverage choice for a fast-paced mobile society. Therefore, this industry endures many

The economies of scale in the retail industry are huge. All of the companies in this industry have first mover advantage. Many of the competitors in this industry already have immense and diverse relationships with many of the suppliers they obtain and any new competitor will have a tough time trying to squeeze into the dealer network in order to establish themselves as any type of threat to another retailer.

 In general, manager’s look at competition has been too narrow. There is a broad set of competitors that need to be looked at, which are described in “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy” by Michael E. Porter. The model explains that there are several other forces in the competition for profits that the strategist should be aware of when forming a stagey. Those forces determine the profitability of the industry and are the most important to look at when you are forming a strategy. These five forces are are the “industry structure” model which contain: New Entrants, Suppliers, Buyers, Substitutes, and Existing Competitors.

If an industry is profitable, it will become a magnet to attract more competitors looking to do same business with us. If it is easy for these new entrants to enter the market, this poses a threat to the firms already competing in that market. Threat of new entrants is one of the forces that shape the competitive structure of an industry (Marc, 2014). A high threat of entry means new competitors are attracted by the profits of the industry and can enter the industry easily. New competitors entering the marketplace can make the market share and profitability of existing competitors more threaten cause the existing competitor to make some changes to existing product quality or price levels. A high threat of new entrance can make an industry more competitive and decrease profit potential for existing competitors whereas a low high threat of new entrance can make an industry less competitive and increases profit potential for the existing