Comprehensive Gang And Delinquency Prevention Programs

In society there is no possible way to turn every gang member into a changed person. But there is a way to lead these young teens away from that type of lifestyle. It’s through many projects and programs that are completely centered on these teens to help get them off the streets and into school to get a good education. On television they have a show where at

Many criminals are sent to jail on a day to day basis. Once they have completed their sentence they are faced with many problems once they are “free”. These problems can be but are not limited to housing, employment, and substance abuse. The prisoner, once they are released, has a tendency to go back to their old ways and to continue the life of crime they were a part of prior to prison. To avoid this, while a prisoner is in prison, the staff creates a reentry program for the prisoner. The reentry program takes affect once the prisoner leaves prison. These programs are created within the community to help the offender from committing new crimes and to integrate them back into society. These programs are also created to help with

The first important ingredient in the G.R.E.A.T program is the instruction of life skills is the foundation of the program. The program is intended as an immunization against delinquency, youth violence, and gang membership for children in the years immediately before the prime ages for introduction into gangs and delinquent behavior. In accordance with a study by Dr. Esbensen in 2000, delinquency often serves as a precursor to gang involvement, the GREAT program focuses on providing life skills to students to help them avoid delinquent behavior and resorting to violence to solve problems. Communities need not have a gang problem in order to benefit from the program as its primary objective is prevention and is intended as an immunization against delinquency, youth violence, and gang membership.

Antisocial behavior can commonly be described as disruptive acts of hostility and aggression toward others. Gang or gangs is described as an organized group of criminals. This essay will discuss the nature and scope of juvenile antisocial behavior as it relates to organized gangs, discuss three of the most common forms of antisocial behavior in organized gangs, and discuss three proactive solutions to gang violence.

In order to evaluate the program, a quasi experiment was conducted which comprised of a treatment group, individuals participating in the Going Home project, and a control group, individuals who did not participate in the program. The assumptions were that lower recidivism rates would be observed among individuals who participated in the program. This assumption was based on the program’s objectives in assisting the offender and community with reintegration efforts. Together, the offender and community were given resources that assisted in alleviating transitional issues experienced by offenders. The goal of the project was to refer offenders to resources as they transition into the community; prepare communities for an offender’s return; and increase Department of Corrections staff communication to prepare

Community aftercare is a significant component to further the success of prison-based treatment. Prison-based treatment starts the recovery process, but a continuum of care is a necessity to maximize the effectiveness of treatment (Olson & Lurigio, 2014). Continued substance abuse treatment along with educational and employment training will be emphasized at the IDOC reentry center. A lack of a high school diploma or GED has been correlated with a high number of offenders who are probation violators (Linhorst, Dirks-Linhorst, & Groom, 2012). Employment training will be provided as many offenders have poor work histories. However once an offender obtains employment, research has shown the chances of them remaining a productive member of society increases. (Webster,

The Ending Gang and Youth Violence policy initiative is aimed at analysing problems with gangs and find intervention to tackle crime connected to young people. It is focuses on preventing gang violence, finding pathways out, punishing offenders, working as partners with different forces and providing support to individuals who got in to gangs.

Society has created many barriers to prevent successful re-entry of ex-offenders back into society. Well-funded evidence based re-entry programs which begin during incarceration and continue through post-release, can help ex-offenders overcome these barriers and successfully reintegrate them into communities. Promoting productive citizens post incarceration decreases the substantial fiscal burden of correctional systems. Thus, the research question becomes, “Is the Indianapolis Re-entry Educational Facility an effective tool at reducing recidivism of residents post release?”

In the article “Evaluating reentry programming in Pennsylvania’s board of Probation & Parole: An assessment of offenders’ perceptions and recidivism outcomes” by Jesse S. Zortman, Thomas Powers, Michele Hiester, Frederick R. Klunk & Michael E. Antonio, explain the positive outcome of reentry programs for offenders under supervision. The research conducted used the outcomes from the Reentry Program in Pennsylvania, and focused on offender’s issues faced when reentering back into the community (Zortman, Powers, Hiester, Klunk & Antonio, 2016). Researchers Philips and Spencer pointed out the different factors which include education, employment, income, stable housing, family, substance abuse and health issues (Zortman et al., 2016). The reentry

Practitioners, academics, criminologists, and case workers all agree that with the right reentry policies and programs in place, a convicted offender has a greater chance at being successfully reintegrated into society. Reentry has become an important part of prisoner release because it is effective for non-recidivism and for the safety of the community. Ideally, a risk assessment is done around an offenders sentencing so that there is more information available at release time which helps to decide on the best reentry model program before the release date. Once the parole board votes for release, the first needs to be addressed is housing, employment and health issues along with other concerns. New ideas continue to be considered so that every offender has an opportunity to succeed.

To discuss the findings on juvenile and adult recidivism, 20-literature review articles were used. Out of the 20 articles found, many did not report findings on implementation and impact of reentry programs on reducing juvenile recidivism. In 2004-2011 data obtained from the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) was used in this study. These programs were comprised of 16 out of 89 programs located in Colorado, Maryland, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Pennsylvania, Maine, Missouri, Indiana, `Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Washington and South Carolina. Arrest data acquired from the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) were used to conduct a treatment outcome evaluation for both SVORI and non-SVORI respondents consisting of in person,

These programs attempt to accomplish a number of objectives. They typically include sanctioning and controlling youths, helping them maintain existing ties within the community, help them restore ties that have been severed as a result of their delinquent behavior, and assist youths’ efforts to develop new and positive ties to others in the community (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). They also provide a correctional response that avoids the negative consequences of institutional placement, provide a more cost effective response to juvenile crime, and reduce the likelihood of recidivism. There is good evidence that some programs not only provide high quality services and successfully address a variety of client needs, but they also do an effective job of protecting public safety (Elrod & Ryder,

Reentry into the community is a goal of the prisoner. It is a realistic aspiration as over 95 percent of those incarcerated will eventually be released. However, reentry is also a goal for the corrections system. Their approach of doing so involves intervening during the reentry process through programming. They seek to reduce recidivism rates after inmate release; recidivism is measured by re-arrest rates for released prisoners.

The After Incarceration Support Systems Program (AISS) is designed to educate, prepare and assist the inmate population with transitioning back into the community. Key components of the program include 1) Working with the inmate within the correctional center prior to release and 2) Working with the offender post-release in the community with an emphasis on a continuum of services. The primary goals of AISS are: reduce recidivism, improve public safety and support the whole person (AISS website, retrieved 7/19/15) The library presentation took place post-release as part of the community collaboration the AISS. The main feature of the program is its holistic, relational approach to working with the offenders and the largely voluntary participation of the offenders (Howe, M., Collins, K. & Engel, L., 2006). . The staff in the women’s program have remained same since the start of the program, and staff members perform “inreach” to incarcerated individuals to begin to form relationships (Howe, M., Collins, K. & Engel, L. 2006). Staff members “meet clients where they are,” and stay with them through the ups and downs of reentry,

Community aftercare is a significant component to further the success of prison-based treatment. Prison-based treatment starts the recovery process, but a continuum of care is a necessity to maximize its effectiveness (Olson & Lurigio, 2014). Equally important is that educational and employment training will be emphasized at the IDOC re-entry center in addition to the continued substance abuse treatment. A lack of a high school diploma or a GED has been correlated with high number of offenders who are probation violators (Linhorst, Dirks-Linhorst, & Groom, 2012). Employment training will be provided as many offenders have poor work histories. However, once an offender obtains employment, research has shown the chances of them