Comprehensive Sex Education Vs Hpv

Sex education classes, whether or not they clash with religious or parental teachings, teach a basic and scientific background of sex, what bodily changes are, and how to protect oneself from the dangers of sex. Statistics show that sex education can reverse current trends and prepare children from the dangers of sex by educating them about STDs, pregnancy, and so on. The United States’ statistics on teenagers and young adults are negatively alarming. “Approximately 10% of all births in the U.S. occur in teenagers and 9.5 million new cases of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed in teenagers and young adults each year (Kaneshiro B.).” Unfortunately, there is a lack of courses aimed at teaching America’s youth about sex and the inherent dangers that they cannot foresee while there is a surplus of television shows such as, Teen Moms, promoting sex and pregnancy.

“U.S. teens have the highest rate of premarital pregnancy in the industrial world” (Thio and Taylor 184). Being such a large issue in our nation, it is important to incorporate sexual education curriculum into schools. Some parents feel that teaching their children about the subject will make them want to participate in sex, but it is more important to not leave the students unaware of the consequences and facts that come with sexual activity. Parents refusing to let their children gain knowledge on the subject are forcing their children to be less aware of potential dangers that come with participating in sexual activity. Premarital sex has become more prevalent in today’s society than it has ever

In an attempt to be effective, comprehensive-sex education programs in school are incorporating family involvement to aid the frequency of communication about sexual knowledge, attitudes and behavior (Grossman). This is a positive step because it will help families discuss the importance of making responsible decisions when it comes to sex. The sex education programs at school have a higher success rate due to the direct access they have to both parents and students. Research shows that family communication about sexual

Understanding the issues that come with sexual education in the classroom is the first step in being a comprehensive sex education advocate. To this day, we see classrooms in middle and high schools preaching about abstinence, shaming children and not being able to give proper, thorough, and informative resources and guidelines on how to approach healthy, body-positive, accessible information about sexual activity. The ideal image abstinence curriculum advocates are hoping for is all adolescents will not have sex prior to marriage, that there will be no STI’s flowing from person A to B, and that the risk of unplanned teen pregnancies will just disappear. The realistic comprehensive approach to sex education states that we are aware that no matter how many ‘do not have sex’ programs we fund and promote, there will always be the handful or more of the population who won’t follow through.

Comprehensive sexual education has long been a contentious issue within the United States of America. Owing largely to America’s history and culture, sexual education has long been stigmatized as unnecessary involvement in the private life, or even misattributed to rising rates of pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. A U.S. review article, however, poses the opposite argument – “The overwhelming weight of evidence reveals that sex education which discusses contraception does not increase sexual activity.” The understanding of sex education not only provides young people with a better understanding of the ways in which their bodies function, but can also help in allowing teenagers to take better care of their sexual health to include pregnancy and STI prevention. Furthermore, sex education improves gender equality, provides accurate information about sexually transmitted infections, and promotes interpersonal skills. Thus, comprehensive sexual education should be introduced and made mandatory in all secondary schools across the United States.

Parents should also play a role in educating their children, it is key for parents to reinforce information in their homes.( Masland. “The Sex Ed Debate”)

Debates about including sexual health education have taken place among society. Many people mistakenly relate sex instructions with motivating teenagers to have sexual intercourse. On the contrary, sexuality is not only based on the sexual behavior, but on a complete array of other topics, such as abstinence, human reproduction, pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections, and sexual health. In fact, sex education is necessary because sexuality is an essential part of each person´s identity.

Adolescents who attend public schools are commonly taught various sexual health lessons informing them about infections and sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s). Sex education is a way of communication from educator to student gradually throughout their developing years on the biological nature, process, and possible consequences of sexual activity. Regardless of the amount of pro-abstinence lessons established in such education courses to prevent teen pregnancy and higher birth rates, there are a plethora of other factors that also affect these rates that government intervention cannot justify. A comprehensive sex program advocates displaying the failure of abstinence-only education and instead, teaches skills to make healthy choices and prevents the discrimination of teens facing social issues. Inadequate knowledge of sexual health can lead to many risky consequences that can arise from not acquiring the proper education from the start.

“Does sex education encourage sex? Many parents are afraid that talking about sex with their teenagers will be taken as permission for the teen to have sex. Nothing could be further from the truth. If anything, the more children learn about sexuality from talking with their parents and teachers and reading accurate books, the less they feel compelled to find out for themselves” (Spock 62).

Towering rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among teens are adding urgency to the argument of sex education within public schools. Sex education in public schools has been a controversial issue in the United States for over a decade. With today’s teenagers beginning puberty at a much earlier rate while marrying later, questions are being framed as to what should be taught about sex education, when should youth begin learning about sex education, who should teach sex education, and how often should sex education be taught. With the rising rates of STI’s and teen pregnancy, sex education has become a prominent conversation. Some of America may believe that sex education is the responsibility of a child’s parent or that sex education programs in public schools should place more importance on abstinence and not encourage adolescents to have sexual intercourse. According to Health News, in 2008 12 percent of students in the United States already has had vaginal intercourse, 7.9 percent had oral sex, and 6.9 had anal sex by the age of 12 (Health News, 2008). This data may be startling because our youth is encountering multiple partners at a younger age which puts them at risk for unplanned pregnancy and STIs far before sex education is being taught. After 1950, teen pregnancy rates consistently dropped. The birth rate in the United States for females between ages 15-19 dropped 20.1% during 1991 and 1998 (National Campaign, 2000).

Yet before the side of a comprehensive sexual education side is examined it is important to look at why some may not believe that this the best method of keeping children healthy and safe. The most prevalent argument for abstinence only education is that it is the most effective form of contraceptive. Without having sex is it almost impossible to get pregnant and almost impossible to conduct sexuall transmitted diseases. In the U.S. almost 15% of parent’s support the teachings of abstinence only education (Santelli et al., 2006, p. 72-81). Much of this significant portion of the population believes that since many children’s and teenager’s minds are not fully developed yet that they should not be able to make decisions that will be able to impact the

School Sex Education can help teens reduce their risk for STD’S. Three notorious STD’s are: Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphilis. They have been steadily increasing in all regions of the country. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention, also known as the CDC, conducted a study in 2014. It concluded our youth aged 15-24 are at a higher risk for acquiring these diseases, despite

Sex Education is a controversial but extremely important topic. Yet, we are doing very little to address it. Teaching sex education in schools are essential for teens to help build a strong foundation of sexual health. Although sex education must begin at home, some parents feel uncomfortable talking about the topic with their children and they believe teaching their children about sex can end up encouraging them to engage in sexual intercourse. Due to that, parents and schools try to emphasize the importance of abstinence. Parents and schools try to teach children to never have sex until they are married. However, this program is flawed because it promotes a bias perspective. The goal of the program should be to inform and educate

Plenty of us, if not all, will agree that as hormones run rampant and curiosity grows even bigger, teenagers and young adults alike will partake in sexual activities as a way to explore their own newfound needs and desires. Though this may be what many enjoy doing, it does come with its own consequences. Regardless of age, sex can definitely result in a multitude of burdens including unwanted pregnancies, as well as various STDs and HPVs (HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, Herpes, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, etc) and other negative consequences. With an astounding lack of proper information regarding sex education, it is no wonder that this is an epidemic. It is obvious that this occurs in a growing number of teens in America, so the question lies; what is being done about informing others about sex? Why is it these teenagers face dilemmas, all which shouldn’t affect them at their age? How said information was received is also something worth asking about. Besides their own peers, and maybe their parents if they dare discuss it with them, a good majority of what teenagers learn is given at local schools. Sex education is given nationwide, but just how valuable is it? How useful is the information; could it be that what is offered, the way it is distributed a factor in the rise of teen pregnancies and STDs? The consequences of inadequate sex education have dire life-changing events which can cause a huge negative affect on their lifestyle overall. With the

Parents are supposed to help guide their children through life, answer the multitude of questions they have with answers many learnt from personal experience. Parents have the ability to shine light on subjects that are sometimes difficult to discuss. Unfortunately, this is not always the case and in many instances a child would be left astray. That is, of course, if there was not a secondary source available full of the same wisdom a parent could provide. In particular, when it comes to sexual education, there are many adverse effects that could arise should that child never be given the thorough discussion that the topic surely needs. Sexual education is an invaluable part of the public school curriculum. I know this not only from my personal experience as a teen but also from the research confirming it’s positive effects on teen pregnancy.