Computer Mediated Communication

These characteristics may serve as the basis of stereotypes that obscure individual differences; prevent people from getting to know others as individuals; and acutely assessing their performance potential (Hunt, J., Osborn, R., Schermerhorn, J., 2005). On the other hand, the impact of demographic characteristics can promote team members to interact, which can contribute to high performance. Some teams who are subjected to demographic characteristics can learn to respect each member 's perspectives, and share the common organizational task.

Assessment at the team level considers team communications, dynamics, and ability to reach consensus as meetings. For that matter, the amount of work completed and the cycle time for the entire process are evaluated as part of the assessment exercise. On the other hand, assessment at the individual team member level considers how the individual cooperates with other team members, communicates his or her ideas and opinions, and participates in team activities. In this case, the number of viable ideas that the individual presented is determined, accuracy considered, and turn-around time for completion of a unit of work factored. Thus, I learnt that team analysis can be conducted from the team or individual member perspective. The knowledge I acquired from this module will stand me in good stead with the six-week practice placement when I will be required to work within teams (Peacock 2006).

Throughout the readings communication was identified as a vital component for establishing and maintaining relationships. Porter-O Grady sanctioned for leaders to establish firm rules of engagement to help support a positive group dynamic (2013). While Kelly & Tazbir explained that friction and conflict were a normal part of group development and were representative of the Storming stage of group process (2014). Moreover, they explained that with assistance from the team leader the team can overcome these obstacles, strengthen inter-professional relationships, and enter into the Norming stage (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). Here the team is able to participate in the effective exchange of communication and begin making progress toward goals. This represents progression into the Performing stage of group process (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). When the team has met its intended target they are ready to anylze the outcomes of their work and enter the final stage of group process—Adjourning (Kelly & Tazbir,

Important team building strategies to consider are focused on giving team members a chance to get to know one another. Through understanding team member’s perceptions, differences, and priorities, insight can be gained to improve conflict resolutions (Moore et

Teamwork also plays a significant role in a company’s communication structure, when leading or managing a team you will be diversity. Whether its gender, race, culture,

My MacBook was my essential medium used throughout the day. I used it to Skype my family in England because they were missing America and our oleaginous fast food. I then spent some time on Facebook and started synchronously messaging some of my other cousins that live in LA. What’s interesting was that I was surfing the web at the same time trying to find out who was going to win between Alvarez and Golovkin. Does that make the communication asynchronous? Relatively, but I didn’t respond later than a minute. I then snapped a story trying to get the attention from my fellow snappers on who would win between these pugilists. In regards to my conversations, I only had one phone call on WhatsApp from my girlfriend and it lasted a brief 5 min.

After reading the chapters as well as the article assigned, my personal opinion to this is that

Past and present researchers, professionals, and educators have made large attempts at discrediting the "fad" autism intervention, facilitated communication. For the articles cited, the concept of FC carries no importance whatsoever in working with someone on the autism spectrum. This paper looks into those articles to make an attempt at defining facilitated communication, disproving facilitated communication, and explaining the perseverance of facilitated communication over the decades. The main objective of this paper is to explore the concept of FC and increase awareness that will hopefully help in bringing a stop to this seemingly never-ending movement.

In the textbook “Looking Out Looking In” authors Adler and Proctor state that “In today’s high-tech world, most people would agree that mediated communication is a valuable—even essential—tool for keeping in touch with coworkers, friends, families, and loved ones”(p. 34). I do accept this to a certain degree. However, children can be tremendously influenced by their cell phones, so we as adults need to be vigilant when dealing with youthful and impressionable minds. I never experienced the complications with my other children that I do with my youngest daughter Sophia.

Why was the message that was sent to me in all caps? Is that a way of showing anger? Many get emails or texts or any forms of messages through electronic communication and have no idea what the message is saying or how their tone of voice is. Many have kids who just started using communication or haven’t started at all, and are wondering what to teach their kids about communication. The best solution to this problem is to teach using face to face communication. In the old days, talking face to face was the way to go. They would walk or drive somewhere and meet up just to have a conversation. Now a day we rely on electronics. Even though sending emails is easy, talking face to face helps understand people in a more formal manner. Are these

A human’s use of communication is a major key to our existence here on earth. If we weren’t capable of communicating our survival would probably be hopeless. As Human beings, we have an extremely detailed system of verbal and non-verbal communication that has developed over time and familiarity. With the advent of technology at the end of the 20th century our communications has moved into the computer realm, in the form of computer-mediated communication (CMC) (Bevan & Sole, 2014). CMC is now a completely normal and very common way to communicate in today’s era. Even though CMC seems to be the preferred way to communicate in this timeframe, it is also seen as less personable and the ending of what we knew as real conversations.

in my opinion, there are many similarities in communicating in person and using technology. in ways of communicating a person can be creative. When people texting, you can send internet expressions. such as emoji, gifs, and little text doodle, also you are talking to someone either way. for example, one of my closest friend talks to me when he needs help on his homework, that he forgot to do or sometimes he texts me with expression to help me understand how serious it is. Another similarity is communicating in person and technology can be time-consuming. I stay like three months from calling my grandmother, so when I call her we stay talking on the phone for an hour and a half. Also, when people are meeting new people for the first time when you're texting them or talking to them. This year I met new friends and now we talk to each other when we're doing a project together, or sometimes we text. Finally, the last similarity bullying can be present in both means of

The world is more connected than ever before. The various channels of communication available to us allow for a multitude of opportunities for civic engagement, public speech and an ability to organize collective action. Within the realm of politics, social media has the possibility of connecting ordinary citizens with politicians and encourage a more “participatory kind of politics” (Shirkey, 2011). However, internet trolling has made politicians wary about engaging with citizens on social media platforms. An internet troll is an individual “who uses anonymity to stir up drama, often within a comment thread on a blog or news website” with a goal of enticing arguments and disputes among other users (Cramer, 2013). By creating a disruptive and an abusive environment on social media, internet trolls are disrupting political discourse, interrupting civic engagement and as a result -- hurting the democratic process.

How does electronic communication affect our social behavior as a whole and our psychological development? Communication is an important part of life. We all do it in a daily basis whether it’s face-to-face or through electronics. Communicating through the internet helps us as it decreases a bit in the time that it would usually take for us to keep in touch with our loved ones. However, it also takes away from the face-to-face interaction we would have with them. One of the most popular ways that people communicate electronically is through text messaging. Just like all the other diverse ways that allows us to communicate electronically such as email, instant messaging, social media etc., text messaging affects us both positively and negatively. Actually we are affected both positively and negatively with just the ability to communicate and interact with others electronically. Electronic Communication tends to affects us socially and psychologically; Socially: in a way that it allows us to keep in touch with our loved ones, especially those who live far from us, however it distracts some of us from our priorities; Psychologically: one can be affected in a

Thirdly, our communication skills were better enhanced and we were able to build up on our synergy levels. In such an environment where communication is open and free-flowing, people were able to bring in new ideas, concepts and attitudes which benefitted the entire group. The problem with ineffective communication, especially where diverse groups are involved is that issues such as stereotyping are bound to crop up. This, in turn, caused team members to become increasingly self-conscious and often kept to themselves for fear of being judged. Much to it, the aspect of self-disclosure becomes almost elusive because no one is willing to step out of their comfort zone and steer a relevant discussion to the project at hand. In a scenario whereby team members are free to talk and express their ideas and feelings without being judged, the fear of revealing one’s true self is diminished tremendously (Peri et al., 2000). This is because such an environment fosters trust, values and ethics. Contrary to this, an environment that is characterized by prejudices and presumptions about others disintegrates this trust and often results to reduced productivity among the members. Cooperation and trust are two aspects that often determine the overall performance of a group. Where there is trust, team players become