Computer Software Engineering : Stealing Intellectual Property And How It Hurts Legitimate Authors

Protection of intellectual property are investments based on acquired knowledge, thought and effort by one or multiple individuals on behalf of themselves, the business they work for when the property is created, and a financial investment. Each of these – acquired knowledge, thought, physical effort, financial investment – have a value that can be attached as it relates the usefulness or importance of the resulting product. That value will have a level of importance to the individual(s) creating the product and if applicable, the investor providing the funds in support of the creation.

An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Author(s): Stanley M. Besen and Leo J. Raskind Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter, 1991), pp. 3-27 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942699 . Accessed: 24/11/2011 08:39

Intellectual property protects legal rights and ownership in the market place through ‘intellectual property rights’. This can include trademarks, copyright, industrial design and patens. These protect brand names, designs and inventions.

In this paper we are going to examine why personal morality is an oxymoron and how a moral system is analogous to a game. Then we are going to analyze how the ethical issue of software piracy is seen from the notion of common moral system according to Gert.

Intellectual property rights grant negative rights to the owner of such rights. Intellectual property is intangible property which serves to safeguard the interest of the owners from infringement. Intellectual property rights are deemed to confer negative rights because render to the owner the right to prevent others from using or exploiting his/ her property. There are basically four types of intellectual property, patents, trademarks, designs and copyright (Harvey, 2009).

The term “Intellectual property” is the ideas, words and the contexts created by someone that becomes that personal belong. Where “plagiarism” is claiming someone’s work or ideas as your own without giving appropriate acknowledgement to the author’s work (page. 225).

It is also important to realize (in the case of Jimmy and his aunt) that a great deal of the legal actions being undertaken are based on characteristics of intellectual properties. In legal terms, the term “intellectual properties”

Intellectual Property or IP as it is commonly known is the expression of an original

Everywhere we look there is intellectual property. Intellectual property relates to intangible property such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets” (USLegal, n.d.). With all of the intellectual property readily available, online and in print there is no wonder that we as a society have an issue with safe guarding our own intellectual property. In order to protect our intellectual property there have been many laws and or rules established to govern how we handle and safeguard this type of property. These laws are found at both state and federal levels and are different between states. In a similar fashion, laws vary between countries as well.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (n.d.) helps one understand the importance of protecting intellectual property. They have spelled out several reasons of this importance including inventing new works in technology and culture, which allows progress to be made that, can be utilized worldwide. In addition, the legal protection of intellectual property encourages the commitment of additional resources for further modernization. Finally, promoting and protecting intellectual property encourages economic growth. It creates new jobs and industries. Protecting intellectual property also enhances the quality and

Intellectual property represents ideas created by minds of humans that require certain rights for their use. Intellectual property gives companies a competitive advantage and attracts the attention of other business partners and investors (Lee, 2016). With such importance, it is necessary for the law to protect these ideas from being used by unauthorized individuals. To shield from this, trade secrets, patents, and copyrights are used to protect the ownership of intellectual property (Legal Information Institute).

Plagiarism is stealing another person’s work without giving proper citation or credit. According to Diana Hacker and Nancy Sommers, "When you use another author's intellectual property- language, visuals or ideas - in your own writing without giving proper credit, you commit a kind of academic theft" (454). This is considered fraud when taking information word for word without in-text citations and work cited. In fact, students often get information from personal blogs. In the words of Ph.D. Ermalynn Kiehl, “Strategies for cheating have become very sophisticated with the use of aids such as personal digital assistants, camera phones, and instant messaging. Cheating on written papers has also increased” (199). Technology advances

At present, stealing comprises a much broader kinds of activities than it used to; it would be enough to remember shop-lifting or numerous facts of counterfeit product utilization when intellectual property is stolen against copyright-based laws and regulations. Stealing, therefore, is expanding and spreading; moreover, the very notion of what is stealing becomes modified and fuzzy. What are then the instruments that the consequential approach

“Copying’ or “borrowing” someone else’s words or ideas may perhaps be the more inoffensive way of explaining plagiarism. However, these two terms may deliver a connotation that plagiarism is not much of a serious offense. Whether the act of plagiarising is intentional or unintentional, it is considered as a fraud. In an academic setting plagiarism may even

On January 23, 2003, the world’s leading computer networking equipment maker Cisco Systems, headquartered in San Jose California, filed a lawsuit against China-based Huawei Technologies and its United States subsidiaries Huawei America and FutureWei Technologies. In the lawsuit, Cisco alleged that Huawei stole intellectual property by copying its Internet Operating System (IOS) software and its copyrighted user manuals. Cisco also claimed that Huawei infringed on its patents. After numerous failed attempts to resolve these complaints directly with Huawei, which included a cease and desist letter to one of Huawei’s United Kingdom distributors, Cisco decided that a lawsuit was necessary to