Concept Analysis: Quality of LIfe

Quality of Life: For the purpose of this paper, the level of living standards which include fundamental factors like health, financial stability, living conditions, and education.

Quality of daily life is a major factor that in presented in this article. Burd-Sharps and Lewis agree when they write:

Happiness is one of the most significant dimensions of human experience. Many people can argue that happiness is a meaningful and desirable entity. Studies indicate that everyone pursues happiness in various aspects of their life. Our four fathers saw happiness as a need, so they made the pursuit of happiness as one of the three unalienable rights branded in the Declaration of Independence. There is a sense of complexity behind the meaning of happiness; its definition is not definite. Think of happiness as a rope; there are many thin fiber strands bonded together to become the strength of the rope. Like the analogy of the rope, there are numerous factors that can contribute to an individual’s overall happiness in life. This study is going to

Quality of life (QOL) is a contemporary phrase which was first heard after the Second World War and, since then, has been frequently used but not well explained (Meeberg, 1993). Most theorists have at least an

Even if we use the word “happiness” on daily basis, has anyone ever tried to define it? It’s harder than it seems. When do you feel happy? How is it when you feel happy? Is there any way to understand how much happiness to you experience? This is the main hypothesis of this paper – Can happiness or wellbeing be measured? And if it can be measured, how do we measure it? Happiness is feeling pleasure and enjoyment because of your life, situation (Meriam Webster). Pleasure and enjoyment are very subjective and means different things to different people. This is where the term subjective wellbeing comes from. There are a lot of things that can be included when measuring wellbeing. Various studies have been conducted to assess wellbeing and how does it affect other factors. For example Earlstin(1995) and later on Ferrer-i-Carbonell(2005) have examined the relationship between income and happiness. Gruber(2004) studies the relationship cigarette taxation and happier smokers. Richard, Clark, Gerogellis and Diener(2004) analyze the effect of unemployment on wellbeing.

Happiness is defined as a subjective form of well-being, both as an emotion and a satisfied outlook of ones life.

Think about this statement: The quality of life should determine the quantity of life. In some sense, it’s true—as we age, our health declines, we lose mobility, we lose clarity of thought and mind, etc.

Happiness is not the only indicator of psychological wellbeing. There are some others such as life satisfaction (e.g. Neugarten, Havighurst, &Tobin, 1961; Wood; Wylie, & Sheator, 1969), emotional and mental health , or subjective wellbeing (Kozma, Stones, & McNeil, 1991). These concepts have been used synonymously with psychological wellbeing, however, even though they are related with psychological wellbeing, they are not identical and should not define psychological wellbeing (Stull, 1987).

Turnbull, H. R., Turnbull, A. P., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Park, J. (2003). A Quality of Life

Good health is pertinent to human survival and wellbeing (DOH, 2013). According to Peplau (1952) the experiences of people in their environment determines their health and affects their daily lifestyle choices. It is then good to say, a person 's health status constantly changes. Having good health makes life worth living and is also influenced by health is influenced by a plethora of things, i.e. genetics, environment, economic and social factors which will be explored in this essay.

Quality of life-The Standard of health, comfort and happiness experienced by an individual or group

Life is not an absolute criterion and cannot be served systemically without regard to circumstance, while quality of life can. Quality of life is a broad multidimensional concept that usually includes subjective evaluations of both positive and negative aspects of life (cdc.gov). Though quality of life has a connotation to everyone, each individual defines it in their own way. On a personal level, it includes physical and mental health perceptions such as energy level, mood, awareness and how they correlate to health risks and conditions, functional status, social support, and socioeconomic status. Components of culture, values and spirituality are key territories of overall quality of life that add to the complication of its measurement. Quality of life is an important consideration in medical care. Quality of life issues have historically played an important part in the nursing role of patient advocacy. Ropka et al. found in the Year 2000 ONS Research Priorities Survey that quality of life ranked second among the top 20 research priorities of sampled nurses (cite).Certain medical treatments can vigorously impair quality of life without providing noticeable benefit, whereas other medical treatments greatly strengthen the quality of life. The perception of health-related quality of life and its determinants have evolved since the 1980s to encompass those aspects of overall quality of life that can be clearly shown to affect health either physically or mentally

Quality of life behaviors: Decreasing behaviors that destroy the quality of life and increasing behaviors that make a life worth living.

Recently there are more people who are emphasizing on the QOL one of them is Moinpour and others [42] have concurred that a perfect personal satisfaction (QOL) survey ought to be short, compact, and straight forward, measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other patient-reported outcomes generate important data in cancer randomized trials to assist in assessing the risks and benefits of cancer therapies and fostering patient-centered cancer care. However, the various ways these measures are analyzed and interpreted make it difficult to compare results across trials, and hinders the application of research findings to inform publications, product labeling, clinical guidelines, and health policy, to address these problems, Setting International standards in analyzing patient reported outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL) initiative has been established. This consortium, directed by the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC), was convened to provide recommendations on how to standardize the analysis of HRQOL and other patient-reported outcomes data in cancer randomized trials. This Personal view discusses the reasons why this project was initiated, the rationale for the planned work, and the expected benefits to cancer research, patient and provider decision making, care delivery, and policy making. It ought to rely upon patient info and limit the open door for wellbeing specialist

The World Health Organization defines quality of life as a person’s perceptions of their position in life in the setting of the culture and value systems in which they live in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns (Krageloh et al., 2011). The WHOQOL-100 was developed by the World Health Organization composed of many different doctors and other healthcare providers in order to develop an assessment that could be used internationally and cross-culturally to measure a person’s overall quality of life and well-being, instead of a specific disease. This assessment led to the development of the WHOQOL-BREF, which is an abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100 because the WHOQOL-100 is too lengthy for practical use; WHOQOL-BREF includes instructions for administering and scoring the assessment. The purpose of this assessment is to provide quality assessments in healthcare, focus attention on all aspects of health, and produce interventions that increase focus on a patient’s well-being (Harper, 1996). There were three main stages to the development of the WHOQOL assessment. The first stage of development consisted of the establishment of a definition of quality of life and how the assessment would be used internationally. The second stage of development explored the quality of life cross-culturally among different fields to establish relevance to the quality of life assessment. The third stage of